基于ctdna的ESR1检测在乳腺癌中的评价:来自中国首个外部质量评估方案的结果

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Guigao Lin, Jing Li, Kuo Zhang
{"title":"基于ctdna的ESR1检测在乳腺癌中的评价:来自中国首个外部质量评估方案的结果","authors":"Guigao Lin, Jing Li, Kuo Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2025.2498542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing of plasma for ESR1 somatic variants is essential for guiding treatment decisions in hormone receptor-positive (HR  +  ) and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have progressed on frontline therapy. To ensure optimal, uniform, and reliable ESR1 testing across China, an pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aliquots of five artificial reference plasma samples containing ESR1 mutations at varying allelic frequencies were distributed to 37 laboratories for testing and reporting according to routine procedures. The genotyping accuracy and clinical reporting were evaluated against standardized criteria, and feedback was provided to the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall genotyping error rate in the EQA was 6.29%, with 91.4% of laboratories correctly identifying the ESR1 mutational status in all samples. A variety of extraction methods and analytical techniques were employed. However, reports often failed to address the risk that tumor DNA may not have been tested, and the limitations of the methodologies used by participants were insufficiently discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variability in genotyping accuracy and reporting standards underscores the importance of EQA and educational guidance to ensure the provision of high-quality clinical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ctDNA-based <i>ESR1</i> testing in breast cancer: results from the first external quality assessment scheme in China.\",\"authors\":\"Guigao Lin, Jing Li, Kuo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737159.2025.2498542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing of plasma for ESR1 somatic variants is essential for guiding treatment decisions in hormone receptor-positive (HR  +  ) and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have progressed on frontline therapy. To ensure optimal, uniform, and reliable ESR1 testing across China, an pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aliquots of five artificial reference plasma samples containing ESR1 mutations at varying allelic frequencies were distributed to 37 laboratories for testing and reporting according to routine procedures. The genotyping accuracy and clinical reporting were evaluated against standardized criteria, and feedback was provided to the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall genotyping error rate in the EQA was 6.29%, with 91.4% of laboratories correctly identifying the ESR1 mutational status in all samples. A variety of extraction methods and analytical techniques were employed. However, reports often failed to address the risk that tumor DNA may not have been tested, and the limitations of the methodologies used by participants were insufficiently discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variability in genotyping accuracy and reporting standards underscores the importance of EQA and educational guidance to ensure the provision of high-quality clinical services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2498542\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2498542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血浆循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)检测ESR1体细胞变异对于激素受体阳性(HR +)和HER2阴性(HER2-)晚期或转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者在一线治疗中取得进展的治疗决策至关重要。为确保全国ESR1测试的最佳、统一和可靠,建立了外部质量评估(EQA)试点方案。方法:将5份含有不同等位基因频率ESR1突变的人工参考血浆样本等分发给37个实验室,按常规程序进行检测和报告。根据标准化标准评估基因分型准确性和临床报告,并向参与者提供反馈。结果:EQA总体基因分型错误率为6.29%,91.4%的实验室正确识别了所有样本中ESR1的突变状态。采用了多种提取方法和分析技术。然而,报告往往未能解决肿瘤DNA可能未被测试的风险,并且参与者使用的方法的局限性没有得到充分讨论。结论:基因分型准确性和报告标准的差异强调了EQA和教育指导对确保提供高质量临床服务的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of ctDNA-based ESR1 testing in breast cancer: results from the first external quality assessment scheme in China.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing of plasma for ESR1 somatic variants is essential for guiding treatment decisions in hormone receptor-positive (HR  +  ) and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have progressed on frontline therapy. To ensure optimal, uniform, and reliable ESR1 testing across China, an pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was established.

Methods: Aliquots of five artificial reference plasma samples containing ESR1 mutations at varying allelic frequencies were distributed to 37 laboratories for testing and reporting according to routine procedures. The genotyping accuracy and clinical reporting were evaluated against standardized criteria, and feedback was provided to the participants.

Results: The overall genotyping error rate in the EQA was 6.29%, with 91.4% of laboratories correctly identifying the ESR1 mutational status in all samples. A variety of extraction methods and analytical techniques were employed. However, reports often failed to address the risk that tumor DNA may not have been tested, and the limitations of the methodologies used by participants were insufficiently discussed.

Conclusion: The variability in genotyping accuracy and reporting standards underscores the importance of EQA and educational guidance to ensure the provision of high-quality clinical services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信