艾氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症的安全性和有效性:长期扩展研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Naim Zaki, Li Nancy Chen, Rosanne Lane, Teodora Doherty, Wayne C Drevets, Randall L Morrison, Gerard Sanacora, Samuel T Wilkinson, Allan H Young, Acioly L T Lacerda, Jong-Woo Paik, Vanina Popova, Dong-Jing Fu
{"title":"艾氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症的安全性和有效性:长期扩展研究。","authors":"Naim Zaki, Li Nancy Chen, Rosanne Lane, Teodora Doherty, Wayne C Drevets, Randall L Morrison, Gerard Sanacora, Samuel T Wilkinson, Allan H Young, Acioly L T Lacerda, Jong-Woo Paik, Vanina Popova, Dong-Jing Fu","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The rates of relapse and suicide risk are higher in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) versus non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Even among patients with TRD who initially respond, the majority (70%) relapse within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray, combined with an oral antidepressant, in patients with TRD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Phase 3, open-label, single-arm long-term extension study (SUSTAIN-3) conducted from June 2016 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults with TRD who participated in ≥1 of 6 phase 3 \"parent\" studies continued esketamine by either entering a 4-week induction phase followed by an optimization/maintenance phase of variable duration (n=458), or directly entering the optimization/maintenance phase of SUSTAIN-3 (n=690), based on their individual response to study drug at the endpoint of the parent study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Intranasal esketamine dosing was flexible, twice-weekly during induction and individualized to depression severity during optimization/maintenance (weekly, every-other-week, or every-4-weeks), under direct supervision by site staff.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>To assess long-term safety of esketamine. Efficacy endpoint included change in depressive symptoms, assessed by Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,148 patients were enrolled. Total exposure to esketamine was 3,777 cumulative patient-years. Mean (median, range) exposure to esketamine in SUSTAIN-3 was 42.9 (45.8, range 0-79) months. The most common adverse events were headache (36.9%), dizziness (33.9%), nausea (33.6%), dissociation (25.5%), nasopharyngitis (23.8%), somnolence (23.1%), dysgeusia (20.2%), and back pain (20.0%). During the study, 5.3% and 6.4% of participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy or adverse event, respectively. Nine participants died: COVID-19 related (n=3), pneumonia (n=2), and completed suicide, myocardial infarction, multiple injuries, unknown cause (n=1 each). Mean MADRS total score decreased during induction, and this reduction persisted during optimization/maintenance (mean [SD] change from baseline-to-phase endpoint of each phase: induction: -12.8 [9.73]; optimization/maintenance: +0.2 [9.93]). 35.6% of participants were in remission at the induction endpoint, and 48.5% and 49.6% at week 112 and optimization/maintenance endpoint, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In the SUSTAIN-3 final dataset, no new safety signals were identified during long-term treatment with intermittently-dosed esketamine, combined with oral antidepressant, and improvement in depression generally persisted among participants who remained on maintenance treatment. These results add to the accumulated evidence on TRD treatment with esketamine.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy with Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Long-Term Extension Study.\",\"authors\":\"Naim Zaki, Li Nancy Chen, Rosanne Lane, Teodora Doherty, Wayne C Drevets, Randall L Morrison, Gerard Sanacora, Samuel T Wilkinson, Allan H Young, Acioly L T Lacerda, Jong-Woo Paik, Vanina Popova, Dong-Jing Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The rates of relapse and suicide risk are higher in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) versus non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Even among patients with TRD who initially respond, the majority (70%) relapse within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray, combined with an oral antidepressant, in patients with TRD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Phase 3, open-label, single-arm long-term extension study (SUSTAIN-3) conducted from June 2016 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults with TRD who participated in ≥1 of 6 phase 3 \\\"parent\\\" studies continued esketamine by either entering a 4-week induction phase followed by an optimization/maintenance phase of variable duration (n=458), or directly entering the optimization/maintenance phase of SUSTAIN-3 (n=690), based on their individual response to study drug at the endpoint of the parent study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Intranasal esketamine dosing was flexible, twice-weekly during induction and individualized to depression severity during optimization/maintenance (weekly, every-other-week, or every-4-weeks), under direct supervision by site staff.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>To assess long-term safety of esketamine. Efficacy endpoint included change in depressive symptoms, assessed by Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,148 patients were enrolled. Total exposure to esketamine was 3,777 cumulative patient-years. Mean (median, range) exposure to esketamine in SUSTAIN-3 was 42.9 (45.8, range 0-79) months. The most common adverse events were headache (36.9%), dizziness (33.9%), nausea (33.6%), dissociation (25.5%), nasopharyngitis (23.8%), somnolence (23.1%), dysgeusia (20.2%), and back pain (20.0%). During the study, 5.3% and 6.4% of participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy or adverse event, respectively. Nine participants died: COVID-19 related (n=3), pneumonia (n=2), and completed suicide, myocardial infarction, multiple injuries, unknown cause (n=1 each). Mean MADRS total score decreased during induction, and this reduction persisted during optimization/maintenance (mean [SD] change from baseline-to-phase endpoint of each phase: induction: -12.8 [9.73]; optimization/maintenance: +0.2 [9.93]). 35.6% of participants were in remission at the induction endpoint, and 48.5% and 49.6% at week 112 and optimization/maintenance endpoint, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In the SUSTAIN-3 final dataset, no new safety signals were identified during long-term treatment with intermittently-dosed esketamine, combined with oral antidepressant, and improvement in depression generally persisted among participants who remained on maintenance treatment. These results add to the accumulated evidence on TRD treatment with esketamine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:难治性抑郁症(TRD)的复发率和自杀风险高于非难治性重度抑郁症。即使在最初有反应的TRD患者中,大多数(70%)在6个月内复发。目的:评价艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂联合口服抗抑郁药治疗TRD患者的长期安全性和有效性。设计:第三期,开放标签,单臂长期扩展研究(SUSTAIN-3),于2016年6月至2022年12月进行。设置:门诊。参与者:参加6个3期“父母”研究中≥1个的TRD成人通过进入4周诱导期,随后是可变持续时间的优化/维持期(n=458),或直接进入SUSTAIN-3的优化/维持期(n=690)继续使用艾氯胺酮,基于他们在父母研究终点对研究药物的个体反应。干预措施:鼻内艾氯胺酮剂量灵活,诱导期间每周两次,优化/维持期间根据抑郁严重程度进行个体化(每周、每隔一周或每4周),由现场工作人员直接监督。主要观察结果和措施:评价艾氯胺酮的长期安全性。疗效终点包括抑郁症状的改变,由Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估。结果:入组1148例患者。艾氯胺酮的总暴露量为3,777累计患者年。在SUSTAIN-3中,埃氯胺酮暴露的平均(中位数,范围)为42.9个月(45.8个月,范围0-79)。最常见的不良事件为头痛(36.9%)、头晕(33.9%)、恶心(33.6%)、精神分离(25.5%)、鼻咽炎(23.8%)、嗜睡(23.1%)、语言障碍(20.2%)和背痛(20.0%)。在研究期间,分别有5.3%和6.4%的参与者因缺乏疗效或不良事件而停止治疗。9名参与者死亡:与COVID-19相关(n=3),肺炎(n=2),完成自杀,心肌梗死,多重损伤,未知原因(各n=1)。平均MADRS总分在诱导过程中下降,并且在优化/维护过程中持续下降(从每个阶段的基线到阶段终点的平均[SD]变化:诱导:-12.8 [9.73];优化/维护:+0.2[9.93])。在诱导终点,35.6%的参与者缓解,在第112周和优化/维持终点,分别为48.5%和49.6%。结论和相关性:在SUSTAIN-3最终数据集中,间歇性给药艾氯胺酮联合口服抗抑郁药长期治疗期间没有发现新的安全性信号,并且在继续维持治疗的参与者中,抑郁症的改善通常持续存在。这些结果增加了用艾氯胺酮治疗TRD的累积证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy with Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Long-Term Extension Study.

Importance: The rates of relapse and suicide risk are higher in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) versus non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Even among patients with TRD who initially respond, the majority (70%) relapse within 6 months.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray, combined with an oral antidepressant, in patients with TRD.

Design: Phase 3, open-label, single-arm long-term extension study (SUSTAIN-3) conducted from June 2016 to December 2022.

Setting: Outpatient.

Participants: Adults with TRD who participated in ≥1 of 6 phase 3 "parent" studies continued esketamine by either entering a 4-week induction phase followed by an optimization/maintenance phase of variable duration (n=458), or directly entering the optimization/maintenance phase of SUSTAIN-3 (n=690), based on their individual response to study drug at the endpoint of the parent study.

Interventions: Intranasal esketamine dosing was flexible, twice-weekly during induction and individualized to depression severity during optimization/maintenance (weekly, every-other-week, or every-4-weeks), under direct supervision by site staff.

Main outcomes and measures: To assess long-term safety of esketamine. Efficacy endpoint included change in depressive symptoms, assessed by Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

Results: 1,148 patients were enrolled. Total exposure to esketamine was 3,777 cumulative patient-years. Mean (median, range) exposure to esketamine in SUSTAIN-3 was 42.9 (45.8, range 0-79) months. The most common adverse events were headache (36.9%), dizziness (33.9%), nausea (33.6%), dissociation (25.5%), nasopharyngitis (23.8%), somnolence (23.1%), dysgeusia (20.2%), and back pain (20.0%). During the study, 5.3% and 6.4% of participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy or adverse event, respectively. Nine participants died: COVID-19 related (n=3), pneumonia (n=2), and completed suicide, myocardial infarction, multiple injuries, unknown cause (n=1 each). Mean MADRS total score decreased during induction, and this reduction persisted during optimization/maintenance (mean [SD] change from baseline-to-phase endpoint of each phase: induction: -12.8 [9.73]; optimization/maintenance: +0.2 [9.93]). 35.6% of participants were in remission at the induction endpoint, and 48.5% and 49.6% at week 112 and optimization/maintenance endpoint, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: In the SUSTAIN-3 final dataset, no new safety signals were identified during long-term treatment with intermittently-dosed esketamine, combined with oral antidepressant, and improvement in depression generally persisted among participants who remained on maintenance treatment. These results add to the accumulated evidence on TRD treatment with esketamine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信