减少儿童麻醉诱导期间焦虑的非药物干预:系统回顾和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yuanyuan Li, Shanshan Peng, Xueqin Xia, Lin Yin, Limei Liao
{"title":"减少儿童麻醉诱导期间焦虑的非药物干预:系统回顾和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuanyuan Li, Shanshan Peng, Xueqin Xia, Lin Yin, Limei Liao","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03077-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety during anesthesia induction can lead to various negative outcomes and psychological burdens in children undergoing surgery. Nonpharmacological interventions are available for reducing anxiety in this context. However, due to a lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the specific effects of these methods on children with anxiety during anesthesia induction remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for reducing anxiety in children during anesthesia induction and to rank these interventions based on their practical applicability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify articles published up to August 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility of potential studies and extracted data. Outcome measures of the meta-analysis were the anxiety levels of children during anesthesia induction, the anxiety levels of parents, and the child's compliance during anesthesia induction. A consistency model was selected to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effects and rank probabilities of different nonpharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 RCTs with 3,040 participants and six intervention methods were included. All trials confirmed the safety of the six intervention methods, with no significant adverse events reported. The network meta-analysis showed that the Passive Distraction Intervention (PDI)-Parental Presence at Induction of Anesthesia (PPIA), Interactive Distraction Intervention (IDI)-PPIA, IDI, PDI, and PPIA interventions were associated with more substantial reductions in anxiety than usual care. However, the studied interventions showed no statistically significant differences for reducing parental anxiety. The PPIA, IDI, and IDI-PPIA interventions also improved compliance during anesthesia induction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirmed that some nonpharmacological interventions are effective at reducing anxiety in children and enhancing compliance during anesthesia induction. Therefore, we recommend several interventions for clinical practice, including the PDI-PPIA, IDI-PPIA, PDI, IDI, and PPIA when working with children undergoing anesthesia induction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022262874).</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonpharmacological interventions for decreasing anxiety during anesthesia induction in children: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Li, Shanshan Peng, Xueqin Xia, Lin Yin, Limei Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03077-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety during anesthesia induction can lead to various negative outcomes and psychological burdens in children undergoing surgery. Nonpharmacological interventions are available for reducing anxiety in this context. However, due to a lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the specific effects of these methods on children with anxiety during anesthesia induction remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for reducing anxiety in children during anesthesia induction and to rank these interventions based on their practical applicability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify articles published up to August 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility of potential studies and extracted data. Outcome measures of the meta-analysis were the anxiety levels of children during anesthesia induction, the anxiety levels of parents, and the child's compliance during anesthesia induction. A consistency model was selected to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effects and rank probabilities of different nonpharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 RCTs with 3,040 participants and six intervention methods were included. All trials confirmed the safety of the six intervention methods, with no significant adverse events reported. The network meta-analysis showed that the Passive Distraction Intervention (PDI)-Parental Presence at Induction of Anesthesia (PPIA), Interactive Distraction Intervention (IDI)-PPIA, IDI, PDI, and PPIA interventions were associated with more substantial reductions in anxiety than usual care. However, the studied interventions showed no statistically significant differences for reducing parental anxiety. The PPIA, IDI, and IDI-PPIA interventions also improved compliance during anesthesia induction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirmed that some nonpharmacological interventions are effective at reducing anxiety in children and enhancing compliance during anesthesia induction. Therefore, we recommend several interventions for clinical practice, including the PDI-PPIA, IDI-PPIA, PDI, IDI, and PPIA when working with children undergoing anesthesia induction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022262874).</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03077-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03077-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻醉诱导过程中的焦虑会导致手术儿童的各种不良结果和心理负担。在这种情况下,非药物干预可用于减少焦虑。然而,由于缺乏从头到尾随机对照试验(rct)的证据,这些方法对麻醉诱导期间焦虑儿童的具体影响尚不清楚。目的:本网络荟萃分析旨在评估所有已知的非药物干预措施在麻醉诱导期间减少儿童焦虑的比较效果,并根据其实际适用性对这些干预措施进行排名。设计:系统回顾和贝叶斯网络元分析。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,检索截止到2024年8月发表的文章。两位审稿人独立评估了潜在研究的合格性并提取了数据。meta分析的结局指标为麻醉诱导过程中患儿的焦虑水平、家长的焦虑水平和患儿在麻醉诱导过程中的依从性。选择一致性模型进行网络荟萃分析,以评估不同非药物干预措施的相对效果和排名概率。结果:共纳入34项随机对照试验,3040名受试者,6种干预方法。所有的试验都证实了这六种干预方法的安全性,没有明显的不良事件报道。网络荟萃分析显示,被动分心干预(PDI)-父母在场麻醉诱导(PPIA),互动分心干预(IDI)-PPIA, IDI, PDI和PPIA干预与常规护理相比,焦虑的减少更为显著。然而,所研究的干预措施在减少父母焦虑方面没有统计学上的显著差异。PPIA、IDI和IDI-PPIA干预也提高了麻醉诱导时的依从性。结论:我们的研究证实了一些非药物干预措施可以有效地减少儿童在麻醉诱导过程中的焦虑和增强依从性。因此,我们建议在临床实践中采用几种干预措施,包括PDI-PPIA、IDI-PPIA、PDI、IDI和PPIA。注册:我们在PROSPERO注册了这个网络荟萃分析(注册号:。CRD42022262874)。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonpharmacological interventions for decreasing anxiety during anesthesia induction in children: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Background: Anxiety during anesthesia induction can lead to various negative outcomes and psychological burdens in children undergoing surgery. Nonpharmacological interventions are available for reducing anxiety in this context. However, due to a lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the specific effects of these methods on children with anxiety during anesthesia induction remain unclear.

Objective: This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for reducing anxiety in children during anesthesia induction and to rank these interventions based on their practical applicability.

Design: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify articles published up to August 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility of potential studies and extracted data. Outcome measures of the meta-analysis were the anxiety levels of children during anesthesia induction, the anxiety levels of parents, and the child's compliance during anesthesia induction. A consistency model was selected to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effects and rank probabilities of different nonpharmacological interventions.

Results: A total of 34 RCTs with 3,040 participants and six intervention methods were included. All trials confirmed the safety of the six intervention methods, with no significant adverse events reported. The network meta-analysis showed that the Passive Distraction Intervention (PDI)-Parental Presence at Induction of Anesthesia (PPIA), Interactive Distraction Intervention (IDI)-PPIA, IDI, PDI, and PPIA interventions were associated with more substantial reductions in anxiety than usual care. However, the studied interventions showed no statistically significant differences for reducing parental anxiety. The PPIA, IDI, and IDI-PPIA interventions also improved compliance during anesthesia induction.

Conclusions: Our study confirmed that some nonpharmacological interventions are effective at reducing anxiety in children and enhancing compliance during anesthesia induction. Therefore, we recommend several interventions for clinical practice, including the PDI-PPIA, IDI-PPIA, PDI, IDI, and PPIA when working with children undergoing anesthesia induction.

Registration: We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022262874).

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信