CASPAR:一项回顾性队列研究,高浓度辣椒素局部系统治疗疼痛性糖尿病足部周围神经病变。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Michael Überall, Tamara Quandel, Sylvia Engelen, Lucia Garcia-Guerra, Tawfik Fajri, Samuel Allen, Rita Freitas, Zoltan Kender, Marielle Eerdekens
{"title":"CASPAR:一项回顾性队列研究,高浓度辣椒素局部系统治疗疼痛性糖尿病足部周围神经病变。","authors":"Michael Überall, Tamara Quandel, Sylvia Engelen, Lucia Garcia-Guerra, Tawfik Fajri, Samuel Allen, Rita Freitas, Zoltan Kender, Marielle Eerdekens","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), a common complication of diabetes, is challenging to treat and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Many patients either fail to achieve adequate pain relief with current treatments or suffer from systemic side effects with oral options. This study used data from the German Pain e-Registry (GPeR) to evaluate the high-concentration capsaicin topical system (HCCTS) for treating pDPN of the feet.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective, non-interventional cohort study (CASPAR) included patients with pDPN of the feet who received ≥1 HCCTS treatment (~3-month treatment intervals) and contributed data to the GPeR for ≥12 months. Data were collected on pain intensity, QoL, sleep, mood, concomitant medication, and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 365 patients with pDPN of the feet were included. Significant reductions in 24-hour average pain intensity (API) were observed from baseline to month 3 (following one HCCTS treatment). Further reductions in mean API score were seen over 12 months with ongoing treatments, whereas API increased in patients who discontinued treatment (baseline to month 12 mean API scores: 61.4 to 8.8 for four HCCTS [∆ -52.6], 59.3 to 16.7 for three HCCTS [∆ -42.6], 56.3 to 31.9 for two HCCTS [∆ -24.4], 57.5 to 51.4 for one HCCTS [∆ -6.1]). Similar trends were seen for sleep, mood, and QoL outcomes. There was a significant reduction in concomitant pain medication use in patients receiving ongoing HCCTS treatments. The most common adverse events were local application-site reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world study in patients with pDPN of the feet demonstrates that ongoing HCCTS treatments continue to improve pain intensity, mood, and QoL, while concomitant medication use decreases. Benefits from treatment were lost following HCCTS discontinuation. These findings emphasize the importance of ongoing treatments to achieve the potential of HCCTS in improving outcomes for patients with pDPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CASPAR: a retrospective cohort study of the high-concentration capsaicin topical system in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Überall, Tamara Quandel, Sylvia Engelen, Lucia Garcia-Guerra, Tawfik Fajri, Samuel Allen, Rita Freitas, Zoltan Kender, Marielle Eerdekens\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), a common complication of diabetes, is challenging to treat and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Many patients either fail to achieve adequate pain relief with current treatments or suffer from systemic side effects with oral options. This study used data from the German Pain e-Registry (GPeR) to evaluate the high-concentration capsaicin topical system (HCCTS) for treating pDPN of the feet.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective, non-interventional cohort study (CASPAR) included patients with pDPN of the feet who received ≥1 HCCTS treatment (~3-month treatment intervals) and contributed data to the GPeR for ≥12 months. Data were collected on pain intensity, QoL, sleep, mood, concomitant medication, and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 365 patients with pDPN of the feet were included. Significant reductions in 24-hour average pain intensity (API) were observed from baseline to month 3 (following one HCCTS treatment). Further reductions in mean API score were seen over 12 months with ongoing treatments, whereas API increased in patients who discontinued treatment (baseline to month 12 mean API scores: 61.4 to 8.8 for four HCCTS [∆ -52.6], 59.3 to 16.7 for three HCCTS [∆ -42.6], 56.3 to 31.9 for two HCCTS [∆ -24.4], 57.5 to 51.4 for one HCCTS [∆ -6.1]). Similar trends were seen for sleep, mood, and QoL outcomes. There was a significant reduction in concomitant pain medication use in patients receiving ongoing HCCTS treatments. The most common adverse events were local application-site reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world study in patients with pDPN of the feet demonstrates that ongoing HCCTS treatments continue to improve pain intensity, mood, and QoL, while concomitant medication use decreases. Benefits from treatment were lost following HCCTS discontinuation. These findings emphasize the importance of ongoing treatments to achieve the potential of HCCTS in improving outcomes for patients with pDPN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004864\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(pDPN)是糖尿病的一种常见并发症,其治疗具有挑战性,并对生活质量(QoL)产生负面影响。许多患者要么无法通过目前的治疗获得足够的疼痛缓解,要么遭受口服治疗的全身副作用。本研究使用来自德国疼痛电子注册(GPeR)的数据来评估高浓度辣椒素局部系统(HCCTS)治疗足部pDPN的效果。研究设计和方法:这项回顾性、非介入性队列研究(CASPAR)纳入了接受≥1次HCCTS治疗(~3个月的治疗间隔)的足部pDPN患者,并为GPeR提供了≥12个月的数据。收集疼痛强度、生活质量、睡眠、情绪、伴随用药和耐受性的数据。结果:共纳入365例足部pDPN患者。从基线到第3个月(一次HCCTS治疗后),观察到24小时平均疼痛强度(API)显著降低。在持续治疗的12个月内,平均API评分进一步下降,而停止治疗的患者API增加(基线至12个月的平均API评分:4个HCCTS[∆-52.6]的61.4至8.8,3个HCCTS[∆-42.6]的59.3至16.7,2个HCCTS[∆-24.4]的56.3至31.9,1个HCCTS[∆-6.1]的57.5至51.4)。在睡眠、情绪和生活质量方面也出现了类似的趋势。在接受持续HCCTS治疗的患者中,伴随止痛药的使用显著减少。最常见的不良事件是局部应用部位反应。结论:这项针对足部pDPN患者的真实世界研究表明,持续的HCCTS治疗继续改善疼痛强度、情绪和生活质量,同时伴随药物使用减少。在HCCTS停止后,治疗的益处消失了。这些发现强调了持续治疗的重要性,以实现HCCTS在改善pDPN患者预后方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CASPAR: a retrospective cohort study of the high-concentration capsaicin topical system in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet.

Introduction: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), a common complication of diabetes, is challenging to treat and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Many patients either fail to achieve adequate pain relief with current treatments or suffer from systemic side effects with oral options. This study used data from the German Pain e-Registry (GPeR) to evaluate the high-concentration capsaicin topical system (HCCTS) for treating pDPN of the feet.

Research design and methods: This retrospective, non-interventional cohort study (CASPAR) included patients with pDPN of the feet who received ≥1 HCCTS treatment (~3-month treatment intervals) and contributed data to the GPeR for ≥12 months. Data were collected on pain intensity, QoL, sleep, mood, concomitant medication, and tolerability.

Results: Overall, 365 patients with pDPN of the feet were included. Significant reductions in 24-hour average pain intensity (API) were observed from baseline to month 3 (following one HCCTS treatment). Further reductions in mean API score were seen over 12 months with ongoing treatments, whereas API increased in patients who discontinued treatment (baseline to month 12 mean API scores: 61.4 to 8.8 for four HCCTS [∆ -52.6], 59.3 to 16.7 for three HCCTS [∆ -42.6], 56.3 to 31.9 for two HCCTS [∆ -24.4], 57.5 to 51.4 for one HCCTS [∆ -6.1]). Similar trends were seen for sleep, mood, and QoL outcomes. There was a significant reduction in concomitant pain medication use in patients receiving ongoing HCCTS treatments. The most common adverse events were local application-site reactions.

Conclusions: This real-world study in patients with pDPN of the feet demonstrates that ongoing HCCTS treatments continue to improve pain intensity, mood, and QoL, while concomitant medication use decreases. Benefits from treatment were lost following HCCTS discontinuation. These findings emphasize the importance of ongoing treatments to achieve the potential of HCCTS in improving outcomes for patients with pDPN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信