接受bcma定向双特异性抗体治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的虚弱患者的结局

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Benjamin O Adegbite, Carlyn Rose Tan, Tala Shekarkhand, Ross S Firestone, Eric Matthew Jurgens, Kevin C Miller, Alexander M Lesokhin, Gunjan L Shah, Neha Korde, Sridevi Rajeeve, Heather J Landau, Michael Scordo, Hani Hassoun, Kylee H Maclachlan, Urvi A Shah, Malin L Hultcrantz, Issam S Hamadeh, Andriy Derkach, David Nemirovsky, Sergio A Giralt, Sham Mailankody, Saad Z Usmani, Hamza Hashmi
{"title":"接受bcma定向双特异性抗体治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的虚弱患者的结局","authors":"Benjamin O Adegbite, Carlyn Rose Tan, Tala Shekarkhand, Ross S Firestone, Eric Matthew Jurgens, Kevin C Miller, Alexander M Lesokhin, Gunjan L Shah, Neha Korde, Sridevi Rajeeve, Heather J Landau, Michael Scordo, Hani Hassoun, Kylee H Maclachlan, Urvi A Shah, Malin L Hultcrantz, Issam S Hamadeh, Andriy Derkach, David Nemirovsky, Sergio A Giralt, Sham Mailankody, Saad Z Usmani, Hamza Hashmi","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In addition to advanced age, patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are often frail with pre-existing comorbidities and poor performance status and have been excluded from clinical trials evaluating bispecific antibodies (BsAb). To evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes based on frailty, we conducted a single center retrospective study of patients with RRMM who received BCMA-directed BsAb. Frailty was defined using the simplified frailty index based on age, ECOG PS, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI); non-frail = score 0-1, frail = score ≥2. Of 102 patients analyzed (age range 40 - 88), 40 (39%) were considered frail. The frail group had more patients with age ≥ 70 years (73% vs 29%, p <0.001), ECOG PS ≥ 2 (36% vs 0%, p <0.001), and worse median CCI (2 vs 1, p <0.001). Patients in the frail group experienced similar rates of all grade CRS (58% vs 60%, p= 0.99), ICANS (15% vs 8%, p= 0.44), and TRM (13% vs 21%, p= 0.27) compared to the non-frail group. Best overall response rate (ORR) was 80% (15% sCR/CR, 48% VGPR) in the frail group vs 73% (23% sCR/CR, 31% VGPR) in the non-frail group (p= 0.40). With a median follow-up of 8.6 months (range 3-14), there was no significant difference in median PFS (Not reached vs 11 months, p= 0.051) or OS (37 vs 25 months, p= 0.37) between the frail and non-frail groups, respectively. Hence, BsAb were deemed safe and effective for elderly and frail patients with RRMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes in Frail Patients Receiving BCMA-directed Bispecific Antibodies for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin O Adegbite, Carlyn Rose Tan, Tala Shekarkhand, Ross S Firestone, Eric Matthew Jurgens, Kevin C Miller, Alexander M Lesokhin, Gunjan L Shah, Neha Korde, Sridevi Rajeeve, Heather J Landau, Michael Scordo, Hani Hassoun, Kylee H Maclachlan, Urvi A Shah, Malin L Hultcrantz, Issam S Hamadeh, Andriy Derkach, David Nemirovsky, Sergio A Giralt, Sham Mailankody, Saad Z Usmani, Hamza Hashmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In addition to advanced age, patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are often frail with pre-existing comorbidities and poor performance status and have been excluded from clinical trials evaluating bispecific antibodies (BsAb). To evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes based on frailty, we conducted a single center retrospective study of patients with RRMM who received BCMA-directed BsAb. Frailty was defined using the simplified frailty index based on age, ECOG PS, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI); non-frail = score 0-1, frail = score ≥2. Of 102 patients analyzed (age range 40 - 88), 40 (39%) were considered frail. The frail group had more patients with age ≥ 70 years (73% vs 29%, p <0.001), ECOG PS ≥ 2 (36% vs 0%, p <0.001), and worse median CCI (2 vs 1, p <0.001). Patients in the frail group experienced similar rates of all grade CRS (58% vs 60%, p= 0.99), ICANS (15% vs 8%, p= 0.44), and TRM (13% vs 21%, p= 0.27) compared to the non-frail group. Best overall response rate (ORR) was 80% (15% sCR/CR, 48% VGPR) in the frail group vs 73% (23% sCR/CR, 31% VGPR) in the non-frail group (p= 0.40). With a median follow-up of 8.6 months (range 3-14), there was no significant difference in median PFS (Not reached vs 11 months, p= 0.051) or OS (37 vs 25 months, p= 0.37) between the frail and non-frail groups, respectively. Hence, BsAb were deemed safe and effective for elderly and frail patients with RRMM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015973\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除高龄外,复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者通常身体虚弱,既往存在合并症和不良状态,因此被排除在评估双特异性抗体(BsAb)的临床试验之外。为了评估基于虚弱的临床特征和结果,我们对接受bcma定向BsAb治疗的RRMM患者进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。采用基于年龄、ECOG PS和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)的简化衰弱指数来定义衰弱;非脆弱=得分0-1,脆弱=得分≥2。在分析的102例患者(年龄范围40 - 88岁)中,40例(39%)被认为虚弱。体弱组患者年龄≥70岁较多(73% vs 29%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes in Frail Patients Receiving BCMA-directed Bispecific Antibodies for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

In addition to advanced age, patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are often frail with pre-existing comorbidities and poor performance status and have been excluded from clinical trials evaluating bispecific antibodies (BsAb). To evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes based on frailty, we conducted a single center retrospective study of patients with RRMM who received BCMA-directed BsAb. Frailty was defined using the simplified frailty index based on age, ECOG PS, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI); non-frail = score 0-1, frail = score ≥2. Of 102 patients analyzed (age range 40 - 88), 40 (39%) were considered frail. The frail group had more patients with age ≥ 70 years (73% vs 29%, p <0.001), ECOG PS ≥ 2 (36% vs 0%, p <0.001), and worse median CCI (2 vs 1, p <0.001). Patients in the frail group experienced similar rates of all grade CRS (58% vs 60%, p= 0.99), ICANS (15% vs 8%, p= 0.44), and TRM (13% vs 21%, p= 0.27) compared to the non-frail group. Best overall response rate (ORR) was 80% (15% sCR/CR, 48% VGPR) in the frail group vs 73% (23% sCR/CR, 31% VGPR) in the non-frail group (p= 0.40). With a median follow-up of 8.6 months (range 3-14), there was no significant difference in median PFS (Not reached vs 11 months, p= 0.051) or OS (37 vs 25 months, p= 0.37) between the frail and non-frail groups, respectively. Hence, BsAb were deemed safe and effective for elderly and frail patients with RRMM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信