Akihiro Matsukawa, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Robert J Schulz, Giulio Litterio, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Thomas Seisen, Keiichiro Mori, Francesca Sanguedolce, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat, Takafumi Yanagisawa
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂作为肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌新辅助治疗的影响:系统综述、荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Akihiro Matsukawa, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Robert J Schulz, Giulio Litterio, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Thomas Seisen, Keiichiro Mori, Francesca Sanguedolce, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat, Takafumi Yanagisawa","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has expanded perioperative treatment options for urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant ICI-based regimens on oncological outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov in September 2024 for studies on neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC. A proportion meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) using random-effect models were conducted to evaluate pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rates and to compare overall survival (OS) and adverse events. The review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024587964).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We included 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 5004 patients) and 35 non-RCTs (2964 patients). ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate versus chemotherapy alone (40.6% vs 17.9%; p < 0.01). In the two phase 3 RCTs included (1556 patients) there was no significant difference in OS between dose-dense methotrexate + vinblastine + Adriamycin + cisplatin (ddMVAC) and durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC; hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.55; p = 0.8). ddMVAC significantly increased the risk of grade ≥3 anemia (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% CI 1.62-4.88) and asthenia (RR 3.46, 95% CI 1.68-7.14) in comparison to GC, while durvalumab + GC did not. Limitations include data heterogeneity across studies and the limited number of studies included in the NMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>ICI addition to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant MIBC setting significantly increased pCR rates in comparison to chemotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in OS between durvalumab + GC and ddMVAC. Further studies are needed to clarify the OS benefit of ICI-based combination therapy in comparison to the current standard chemotherapy regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Akihiro Matsukawa, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Robert J Schulz, Giulio Litterio, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Thomas Seisen, Keiichiro Mori, Francesca Sanguedolce, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat, Takafumi Yanagisawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has expanded perioperative treatment options for urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant ICI-based regimens on oncological outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov in September 2024 for studies on neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC. A proportion meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) using random-effect models were conducted to evaluate pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rates and to compare overall survival (OS) and adverse events. The review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024587964).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We included 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 5004 patients) and 35 non-RCTs (2964 patients). ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate versus chemotherapy alone (40.6% vs 17.9%; p < 0.01). In the two phase 3 RCTs included (1556 patients) there was no significant difference in OS between dose-dense methotrexate + vinblastine + Adriamycin + cisplatin (ddMVAC) and durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC; hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.55; p = 0.8). ddMVAC significantly increased the risk of grade ≥3 anemia (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% CI 1.62-4.88) and asthenia (RR 3.46, 95% CI 1.68-7.14) in comparison to GC, while durvalumab + GC did not. Limitations include data heterogeneity across studies and the limited number of studies included in the NMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>ICI addition to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant MIBC setting significantly increased pCR rates in comparison to chemotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in OS between durvalumab + GC and ddMVAC. Further studies are needed to clarify the OS benefit of ICI-based combination therapy in comparison to the current standard chemotherapy regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的可用性扩大了尿路上皮癌的围手术期治疗选择。我们的目的是评估基于ci的新辅助治疗方案对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者肿瘤预后的影响。方法:我们于2024年9月系统地检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索有关新辅助治疗MIBC的研究。采用随机效应模型进行比例荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析(NMA)来评估合并病理完全缓解(pCR)率,并比较总生存期(OS)和不良事件。该审查已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024587964)。主要发现和局限性:我们纳入了12项随机对照试验(rct;5004例患者)和35例非rct(2964例患者)。与单独化疗相比,ici -化疗联合治疗的pCR率显著更高(40.6% vs 17.9%;结论和临床意义:与单独化疗相比,新辅助MIBC组中ICI加化疗显著增加pCR率。然而,durvalumab + GC和ddMVAC在OS方面没有差异。与目前的标准化疗方案相比,需要进一步的研究来阐明基于ci的联合治疗的OS益处。
Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis.
Background and objective: The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has expanded perioperative treatment options for urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant ICI-based regimens on oncological outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov in September 2024 for studies on neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC. A proportion meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) using random-effect models were conducted to evaluate pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rates and to compare overall survival (OS) and adverse events. The review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024587964).
Key findings and limitations: We included 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 5004 patients) and 35 non-RCTs (2964 patients). ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate versus chemotherapy alone (40.6% vs 17.9%; p < 0.01). In the two phase 3 RCTs included (1556 patients) there was no significant difference in OS between dose-dense methotrexate + vinblastine + Adriamycin + cisplatin (ddMVAC) and durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC; hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.55; p = 0.8). ddMVAC significantly increased the risk of grade ≥3 anemia (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% CI 1.62-4.88) and asthenia (RR 3.46, 95% CI 1.68-7.14) in comparison to GC, while durvalumab + GC did not. Limitations include data heterogeneity across studies and the limited number of studies included in the NMA.
Conclusions and clinical implications: ICI addition to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant MIBC setting significantly increased pCR rates in comparison to chemotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in OS between durvalumab + GC and ddMVAC. Further studies are needed to clarify the OS benefit of ICI-based combination therapy in comparison to the current standard chemotherapy regimen.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format