腰椎椎体量化(VBQ)和CT霍斯菲尔德单位(HUs)对骨密度的预测效率分析:年龄和性别差异。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xianghe Wang, Minghang Chen, Chenjie Shan, Xiang Fang, Chaohui Ding, Zongjie Yuan, Honglin Teng
{"title":"腰椎椎体量化(VBQ)和CT霍斯菲尔德单位(HUs)对骨密度的预测效率分析:年龄和性别差异。","authors":"Xianghe Wang, Minghang Chen, Chenjie Shan, Xiang Fang, Chaohui Ding, Zongjie Yuan, Honglin Teng","doi":"10.1177/21925682251334985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThis study examines the consistency of Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units (CT HUs) with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference standard, evaluating the diagnostic performance of these 2 imaging techniques across different age groups and genders. Particular attention is given to the applicability of VBQ in different age and gender cohorts.MethodsWe included 972 eligible patients, from which 569 patients were randomly selected and included in the analysis according to the inclusion criteria. These patients underwent lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), lumbar CT, and DXA within 3 months of hospital admission. The study assessed the correlation and diagnostic efficacy of these techniques in measuring lumbar and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD).ResultsIt showed good correlation between VBQ and CT HUs with DXA in individuals under 70 years of age. However, in the population over 70 years, the correlation of VBQ with DXA significantly decreased (lumbar BMD pr = -.145 <i>P</i> > .05; femoral neck BMD r = -.097 <i>P</i> > .05), whereas CT HUs maintained high diagnostic performance. The ROC curve analysis indicated that the AUC for differentiating osteoporosis (based on lumbar spine BMD) by VBQ was .545 in males over 70 and .487 in females over 70. However, CT HUs demonstrated diagnostic performance across all groups.ConclusionVBQ is effective in assessing osteoporosis in patients under 70 but shows decreased efficacy in those over 70. When using VBQ to predict osteoporosis in patients on opportunistic grounds, it is still necessary to incorporate additional reference indicators, such as CT HUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251334985"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Predictive Efficiency of Lumbar Vertebral Body Quantification (VBQ) and CT Hounsfield Units (HUs) for Bone Density: Age and Gender Differences.\",\"authors\":\"Xianghe Wang, Minghang Chen, Chenjie Shan, Xiang Fang, Chaohui Ding, Zongjie Yuan, Honglin Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682251334985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThis study examines the consistency of Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units (CT HUs) with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference standard, evaluating the diagnostic performance of these 2 imaging techniques across different age groups and genders. Particular attention is given to the applicability of VBQ in different age and gender cohorts.MethodsWe included 972 eligible patients, from which 569 patients were randomly selected and included in the analysis according to the inclusion criteria. These patients underwent lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), lumbar CT, and DXA within 3 months of hospital admission. The study assessed the correlation and diagnostic efficacy of these techniques in measuring lumbar and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD).ResultsIt showed good correlation between VBQ and CT HUs with DXA in individuals under 70 years of age. However, in the population over 70 years, the correlation of VBQ with DXA significantly decreased (lumbar BMD pr = -.145 <i>P</i> > .05; femoral neck BMD r = -.097 <i>P</i> > .05), whereas CT HUs maintained high diagnostic performance. The ROC curve analysis indicated that the AUC for differentiating osteoporosis (based on lumbar spine BMD) by VBQ was .545 in males over 70 and .487 in females over 70. However, CT HUs demonstrated diagnostic performance across all groups.ConclusionVBQ is effective in assessing osteoporosis in patients under 70 but shows decreased efficacy in those over 70. When using VBQ to predict osteoporosis in patients on opportunistic grounds, it is still necessary to incorporate additional reference indicators, such as CT HUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682251334985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251334985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251334985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的探讨以双能x线吸收仪(DXA)为参考标准的椎体骨质量(VBQ)和计算机断层霍斯菲尔德单元(CT HUs)的一致性,评估这两种成像技术在不同年龄组和性别中的诊断性能。特别注意VBQ在不同年龄和性别群体中的适用性。方法纳入972例符合条件的患者,其中随机抽取569例按纳入标准纳入分析。这些患者在入院3个月内接受了腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)、腰椎CT和DXA检查。该研究评估了这些技术在测量腰椎和股骨颈骨密度(BMD)方面的相关性和诊断功效。结果70岁以下人群VBQ、CT HUs与DXA有良好的相关性。然而,在70岁以上的人群中,VBQ与DXA的相关性显著降低(腰椎骨密度pr = - 0.145)P < 0.05;股骨颈骨密度r = - 0.097P < 0.05),而CT hu保持较高的诊断性能。ROC曲线分析显示,70岁以上男性用VBQ鉴别骨质疏松(基于腰椎骨密度)的AUC为0.545,70岁以上女性为0.487。然而,CT HUs在所有组中都显示出诊断性能。结论vbq对70岁以下骨质疏松患者有较好的评价效果,但对70岁以上骨质疏松患者的评价效果较差。在利用VBQ预测患者骨质疏松时,仍有必要纳入其他参考指标,如CT HUs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Predictive Efficiency of Lumbar Vertebral Body Quantification (VBQ) and CT Hounsfield Units (HUs) for Bone Density: Age and Gender Differences.

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThis study examines the consistency of Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units (CT HUs) with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference standard, evaluating the diagnostic performance of these 2 imaging techniques across different age groups and genders. Particular attention is given to the applicability of VBQ in different age and gender cohorts.MethodsWe included 972 eligible patients, from which 569 patients were randomly selected and included in the analysis according to the inclusion criteria. These patients underwent lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), lumbar CT, and DXA within 3 months of hospital admission. The study assessed the correlation and diagnostic efficacy of these techniques in measuring lumbar and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD).ResultsIt showed good correlation between VBQ and CT HUs with DXA in individuals under 70 years of age. However, in the population over 70 years, the correlation of VBQ with DXA significantly decreased (lumbar BMD pr = -.145 P > .05; femoral neck BMD r = -.097 P > .05), whereas CT HUs maintained high diagnostic performance. The ROC curve analysis indicated that the AUC for differentiating osteoporosis (based on lumbar spine BMD) by VBQ was .545 in males over 70 and .487 in females over 70. However, CT HUs demonstrated diagnostic performance across all groups.ConclusionVBQ is effective in assessing osteoporosis in patients under 70 but shows decreased efficacy in those over 70. When using VBQ to predict osteoporosis in patients on opportunistic grounds, it is still necessary to incorporate additional reference indicators, such as CT HUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信