无创脑刺激作为医院、诊所和家庭的局灶性癫痫治疗。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70033
Karimul Islam, Keith Starnes, Kelsey M. Smith, Thomas Richner, Nicholas Gregg, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Gregory A. Worrell, Brian N. Lundstrom
{"title":"无创脑刺激作为医院、诊所和家庭的局灶性癫痫治疗。","authors":"Karimul Islam,&nbsp;Keith Starnes,&nbsp;Kelsey M. Smith,&nbsp;Thomas Richner,&nbsp;Nicholas Gregg,&nbsp;Alejandro A. Rabinstein,&nbsp;Gregory A. Worrell,&nbsp;Brian N. Lundstrom","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) provides a treatment option for patients not eligible for surgical intervention or who seek low-risk approaches and may be used in the hospital, clinic, and at home. Our objective is to summarize our single-center experience with multiple NIBS approaches for the treatment of focal epilepsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective chart review identified drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who received NIBS as an epilepsy treatment at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients were typically treated as follows: (1) for TMS, 1 Hz stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the neuromodulation clinic, (2) for outpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the clinic, followed by optional treatment at home, and (3) for inpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for three consecutive days. We analyzed continuous EEG data for the inpatient tDCS cohort and available HD-EEG data for outpatient cohorts to quantify changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as a result of stimulation. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month for TMS and outpatient tDCS and 1 week for inpatient tDCS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four patients were treated with TMS (<i>n</i> = 10) and tDCS (<i>n</i> = 14, 9 as outpatients). The median age was 40 years (range 15–73). The median seizure reduction following stimulation was 50%. Fourteen patients (58%) were responders to treatment (TMS = 4/10, tDCS Outpatient = 7/9, tDCS Inpatient = 3/5). Five outpatient tDCS participants elected to continue treatment at home. Four TMS and four outpatient tDCS patients underwent high-density EEG before and after 5 days of therapy. Following stimulation, IED rate was reduced in 4/5 inpatient tDCS patients, 4/4 outpatient tDCS patients, and 4/4 TMS patients. Two patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency (1 following TMS and 1 following outpatient tDCS), which returned to baseline 4–6 weeks after stimulation treatments were discontinued.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>TMS and tDCS are potential treatment approaches for drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients in the hospital, clinic, and home. They have a favorable safety profile and can lead to a reduction in IED rates and seizures. These results suggest further studies are needed to examine NIBS as a treatment for epilepsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Noninvasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, offers new treatment options for patients with focal seizures. This study reviewed the experience at Mayo Clinic using noninvasive brain stimulation in the hospital, clinic, and at-home settings to treat seizures. The results showed an overall 50% median seizure reduction, and 58% of patients had at least a 50% reduction in seizures. Noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising treatment approach with a favorable safety profile.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"787-795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive brain stimulation as focal epilepsy treatment in the hospital, clinic, and home\",\"authors\":\"Karimul Islam,&nbsp;Keith Starnes,&nbsp;Kelsey M. Smith,&nbsp;Thomas Richner,&nbsp;Nicholas Gregg,&nbsp;Alejandro A. Rabinstein,&nbsp;Gregory A. Worrell,&nbsp;Brian N. Lundstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epi4.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) provides a treatment option for patients not eligible for surgical intervention or who seek low-risk approaches and may be used in the hospital, clinic, and at home. Our objective is to summarize our single-center experience with multiple NIBS approaches for the treatment of focal epilepsy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective chart review identified drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who received NIBS as an epilepsy treatment at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients were typically treated as follows: (1) for TMS, 1 Hz stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the neuromodulation clinic, (2) for outpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the clinic, followed by optional treatment at home, and (3) for inpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for three consecutive days. We analyzed continuous EEG data for the inpatient tDCS cohort and available HD-EEG data for outpatient cohorts to quantify changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as a result of stimulation. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month for TMS and outpatient tDCS and 1 week for inpatient tDCS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-four patients were treated with TMS (<i>n</i> = 10) and tDCS (<i>n</i> = 14, 9 as outpatients). The median age was 40 years (range 15–73). The median seizure reduction following stimulation was 50%. Fourteen patients (58%) were responders to treatment (TMS = 4/10, tDCS Outpatient = 7/9, tDCS Inpatient = 3/5). Five outpatient tDCS participants elected to continue treatment at home. Four TMS and four outpatient tDCS patients underwent high-density EEG before and after 5 days of therapy. Following stimulation, IED rate was reduced in 4/5 inpatient tDCS patients, 4/4 outpatient tDCS patients, and 4/4 TMS patients. Two patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency (1 following TMS and 1 following outpatient tDCS), which returned to baseline 4–6 weeks after stimulation treatments were discontinued.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>TMS and tDCS are potential treatment approaches for drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients in the hospital, clinic, and home. They have a favorable safety profile and can lead to a reduction in IED rates and seizures. These results suggest further studies are needed to examine NIBS as a treatment for epilepsy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>Noninvasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, offers new treatment options for patients with focal seizures. This study reviewed the experience at Mayo Clinic using noninvasive brain stimulation in the hospital, clinic, and at-home settings to treat seizures. The results showed an overall 50% median seizure reduction, and 58% of patients had at least a 50% reduction in seizures. Noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising treatment approach with a favorable safety profile.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"787-795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:无创脑刺激(NIBS)为不符合手术条件或寻求低风险方法的患者提供了一种治疗选择,可在医院、诊所和家中使用。我们的目标是总结单中心多NIBS方法治疗局灶性癫痫的经验。方法:在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所接受NIBS作为癫痫治疗的耐药局灶性癫痫患者进行回顾性图表回顾。患者的典型治疗方法如下:(1)经颅磁刺激,在神经调节诊所连续5天施加1 Hz的刺激;(2)门诊tDCS,在诊所连续5天施加刺激,然后在家选择治疗;(3)住院tDCS,连续3天施加刺激。我们分析了住院患者tDCS队列的连续EEG数据和门诊队列的可用HD-EEG数据,以量化刺激导致的间期癫痫样放电(ied)的变化。结果在TMS和门诊tDCS组1个月时评估,住院tDCS组1周时评估。结果:经颅磁刺激治疗24例(n = 10), tDCS治疗24例(n = 14,门诊9例)。中位年龄为40岁(范围15-73岁)。刺激后癫痫发作减少的中位数为50%。14例患者(58%)对治疗有反应(TMS = 4/10, tDCS门诊= 7/9,tDCS住院= 3/5)。5名门诊tDCS参与者选择继续在家治疗。4例TMS患者和4例门诊tDCS患者在治疗前和治疗后5 d行高密度脑电图检查。刺激后,4/5住院tDCS患者、4/4门诊tDCS患者和4/4 TMS患者的IED发生率降低。2例患者癫痫发作频率增加(1例在TMS后,1例在门诊tDCS后),在停止刺激治疗4-6周后恢复到基线。意义:TMS和tDCS是医院、诊所和家庭治疗耐药局灶性癫痫患者的潜在治疗方法。它们具有良好的安全性,可以减少IED发生率和癫痫发作。这些结果表明,需要进一步的研究来检验NIBS作为癫痫的治疗方法。无创脑刺激,如经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激,为局灶性癫痫患者提供了新的治疗选择。本研究回顾了梅奥诊所在医院、诊所和家庭使用无创脑刺激治疗癫痫发作的经验。结果显示癫痫发作减少了50%,58%的患者癫痫发作至少减少了50%。无创脑刺激是一种有前景的治疗方法,具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive brain stimulation as focal epilepsy treatment in the hospital, clinic, and home

Objective

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) provides a treatment option for patients not eligible for surgical intervention or who seek low-risk approaches and may be used in the hospital, clinic, and at home. Our objective is to summarize our single-center experience with multiple NIBS approaches for the treatment of focal epilepsy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who received NIBS as an epilepsy treatment at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients were typically treated as follows: (1) for TMS, 1 Hz stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the neuromodulation clinic, (2) for outpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the clinic, followed by optional treatment at home, and (3) for inpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for three consecutive days. We analyzed continuous EEG data for the inpatient tDCS cohort and available HD-EEG data for outpatient cohorts to quantify changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as a result of stimulation. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month for TMS and outpatient tDCS and 1 week for inpatient tDCS.

Results

Twenty-four patients were treated with TMS (n = 10) and tDCS (n = 14, 9 as outpatients). The median age was 40 years (range 15–73). The median seizure reduction following stimulation was 50%. Fourteen patients (58%) were responders to treatment (TMS = 4/10, tDCS Outpatient = 7/9, tDCS Inpatient = 3/5). Five outpatient tDCS participants elected to continue treatment at home. Four TMS and four outpatient tDCS patients underwent high-density EEG before and after 5 days of therapy. Following stimulation, IED rate was reduced in 4/5 inpatient tDCS patients, 4/4 outpatient tDCS patients, and 4/4 TMS patients. Two patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency (1 following TMS and 1 following outpatient tDCS), which returned to baseline 4–6 weeks after stimulation treatments were discontinued.

Significance

TMS and tDCS are potential treatment approaches for drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients in the hospital, clinic, and home. They have a favorable safety profile and can lead to a reduction in IED rates and seizures. These results suggest further studies are needed to examine NIBS as a treatment for epilepsy.

Plain Language Summary

Noninvasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, offers new treatment options for patients with focal seizures. This study reviewed the experience at Mayo Clinic using noninvasive brain stimulation in the hospital, clinic, and at-home settings to treat seizures. The results showed an overall 50% median seizure reduction, and 58% of patients had at least a 50% reduction in seizures. Noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising treatment approach with a favorable safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信