动态加载后3D打印和常规临时修复材料的表面粗糙度。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-04-01
Hatice B Özel, Ceren Küçük, Yelda Çiçek
{"title":"动态加载后3D打印和常规临时修复材料的表面粗糙度。","authors":"Hatice B Özel, Ceren Küçük, Yelda Çiçek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the surface roughness (Ra; µm) of three different interim resin materials, which were subjected to chewing simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three interim resin materials were evaluated: (1) LCD type (liquid crystal displays) 3D printed (LCD, n= 10); (2) conventional autopolymerizing bis-acrylic (CO, n= 10); (3) DLP type (digital light processing) 3D printed (DLP, n= 10) interim resin materials. The specimens were subjected to 30,000 cycles of chewing simulation. The surface roughness of the materials was compared and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images representing each group were obtained. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were carried out for comparison of the groups. Paired samples t test was used to compare the Ra values of each group separately before and after chewing simulation (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± standard deviation values of baseline surface roughness values were 1.252 ± 0.426 for LCD printed resin, 0.715 ± 1.321 for conventional resin, 0.525 ± 0.963 for DLP printed resin. LCD group had the highest Ra 0 values. No statistically significant difference was observed between the CO and DLP group. After 30,000 cycles of simulated chewing, the mean surface roughness values for LCD, CO and DLP groups were 0.992 ± 0.160, 0.524 ± 0.288 and 0.542 ± 0.658, respectively. After chewing simulation, the difference among the Ra1 values of groups were statistically significant (P= 0.014). LCD group had the highest Ra1 values. No statistically significant difference was observed between the CO and DLP group. The difference of Ra values of all interim materials after chewing simulation compared to baseline were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Since the results showed that the Ra values in this study were above the plaque accumulation threshold Ra of 0.20 µm and SEM images were consistent with the Ra measurements, care should be taken to adequately polymerize and polish the restoration surface, especially when it is being used for an extended period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"38 2","pages":"67-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface roughness of 3D printed and conventional interim restorative materials after dynamic loading.\",\"authors\":\"Hatice B Özel, Ceren Küçük, Yelda Çiçek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the surface roughness (Ra; µm) of three different interim resin materials, which were subjected to chewing simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three interim resin materials were evaluated: (1) LCD type (liquid crystal displays) 3D printed (LCD, n= 10); (2) conventional autopolymerizing bis-acrylic (CO, n= 10); (3) DLP type (digital light processing) 3D printed (DLP, n= 10) interim resin materials. The specimens were subjected to 30,000 cycles of chewing simulation. The surface roughness of the materials was compared and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images representing each group were obtained. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were carried out for comparison of the groups. Paired samples t test was used to compare the Ra values of each group separately before and after chewing simulation (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± standard deviation values of baseline surface roughness values were 1.252 ± 0.426 for LCD printed resin, 0.715 ± 1.321 for conventional resin, 0.525 ± 0.963 for DLP printed resin. LCD group had the highest Ra 0 values. No statistically significant difference was observed between the CO and DLP group. After 30,000 cycles of simulated chewing, the mean surface roughness values for LCD, CO and DLP groups were 0.992 ± 0.160, 0.524 ± 0.288 and 0.542 ± 0.658, respectively. After chewing simulation, the difference among the Ra1 values of groups were statistically significant (P= 0.014). LCD group had the highest Ra1 values. No statistically significant difference was observed between the CO and DLP group. The difference of Ra values of all interim materials after chewing simulation compared to baseline were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Since the results showed that the Ra values in this study were above the plaque accumulation threshold Ra of 0.20 µm and SEM images were consistent with the Ra measurements, care should be taken to adequately polymerize and polish the restoration surface, especially when it is being used for an extended period of time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"67-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究表面粗糙度(Ra;µm)的三种不同的中间树脂材料,进行咀嚼模拟。方法:对3种中间树脂材料进行评价:(1)LCD型(液晶显示器)3D打印(LCD, n= 10);(2)常规自聚合双丙烯酸(CO, n= 10);(3) DLP型(数字光处理)3D打印(DLP, n= 10)中间树脂材料。这些标本进行了3万次模拟咀嚼。比较了材料的表面粗糙度,并获得了代表每组材料的扫描电镜(SEM)图像。采用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验进行组间比较。采用配对样本t检验分别比较各组模拟咀嚼前后Ra值(α= 0.05)。结果:LCD打印树脂的基线表面粗糙度平均值±标准差为1.252±0.426,常规树脂为0.715±1.321,DLP打印树脂为0.525±0.963。LCD组Ra 0值最高。CO组与DLP组间差异无统计学意义。3万次模拟咀嚼后,LCD组、CO组和DLP组的平均表面粗糙度值分别为0.992±0.160、0.524±0.288和0.542±0.658。模拟咀嚼后,各组Ra1值差异有统计学意义(P= 0.014)。LCD组Ra1值最高。CO组与DLP组间差异无统计学意义。模拟咀嚼后各中间物料的Ra值与基线比较差异均无统计学意义。临床意义:由于本研究结果显示Ra值高于斑块积累阈值Ra 0.20µm, SEM图像与Ra测量值一致,因此应注意充分聚合和抛光修复体表面,特别是长时间使用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surface roughness of 3D printed and conventional interim restorative materials after dynamic loading.

Purpose: To investigate the surface roughness (Ra; µm) of three different interim resin materials, which were subjected to chewing simulation.

Methods: Three interim resin materials were evaluated: (1) LCD type (liquid crystal displays) 3D printed (LCD, n= 10); (2) conventional autopolymerizing bis-acrylic (CO, n= 10); (3) DLP type (digital light processing) 3D printed (DLP, n= 10) interim resin materials. The specimens were subjected to 30,000 cycles of chewing simulation. The surface roughness of the materials was compared and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images representing each group were obtained. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were carried out for comparison of the groups. Paired samples t test was used to compare the Ra values of each group separately before and after chewing simulation (α= 0.05).

Results: The mean ± standard deviation values of baseline surface roughness values were 1.252 ± 0.426 for LCD printed resin, 0.715 ± 1.321 for conventional resin, 0.525 ± 0.963 for DLP printed resin. LCD group had the highest Ra 0 values. No statistically significant difference was observed between the CO and DLP group. After 30,000 cycles of simulated chewing, the mean surface roughness values for LCD, CO and DLP groups were 0.992 ± 0.160, 0.524 ± 0.288 and 0.542 ± 0.658, respectively. After chewing simulation, the difference among the Ra1 values of groups were statistically significant (P= 0.014). LCD group had the highest Ra1 values. No statistically significant difference was observed between the CO and DLP group. The difference of Ra values of all interim materials after chewing simulation compared to baseline were not statistically significant.

Clinical significance: Since the results showed that the Ra values in this study were above the plaque accumulation threshold Ra of 0.20 µm and SEM images were consistent with the Ra measurements, care should be taken to adequately polymerize and polish the restoration surface, especially when it is being used for an extended period of time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信