Pierre Stephan, Roberta Di Blasi, Louise Roulin, Jean Galtier, Julien Calvani, Véronique Meignin, Marie Donzel, Alexandra Traverse-Glehen, Elsa Poullot, Marie Parrens, Vivien Dupont, Alexandra Marquet, Steven Le Gouill, Roch Houot, Francois-Xavier Gros, François Lemonnier, Emmanuel Bachy, Catherine Thieblemont, Pierre Sesques
{"title":"TRANSCAR: CD19CAR - T细胞治疗复发/难治性转化惰性淋巴瘤的真实结果","authors":"Pierre Stephan, Roberta Di Blasi, Louise Roulin, Jean Galtier, Julien Calvani, Véronique Meignin, Marie Donzel, Alexandra Traverse-Glehen, Elsa Poullot, Marie Parrens, Vivien Dupont, Alexandra Marquet, Steven Le Gouill, Roch Houot, Francois-Xavier Gros, François Lemonnier, Emmanuel Bachy, Catherine Thieblemont, Pierre Sesques","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown impressive results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). However, the prognostic value of the LBCL histological subtype in the context of CAR T-cell therapy is unclear. Here, we report the prognostic value of transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (TriNHL; N = 110) confirmed by an expert pathological review (LYMPHOPATH) vs de novo LBCL (N = 391) in the context of CAR T-cell therapy from 4 centers of the French DESCAR-T registry. After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 170, 85 patients with TriNHL and 85 patients with de novo LBCL), the median follow-up was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-25.1) for patients with TriNHL and 18.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.8) for patients with LBCL. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was significantly better (55.8%; 95% CI, 43.6-66.4) in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (31.7%; 95% CI, 21.4-42.6; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.82; P = .0034). The best overall response rate and complete response rate were 82.4% and 63.5%, respectively, whereas they were 63.5% and 50.6%, respectively, for the TriNHL group compared with the de novo LBCL group. The 1-year overall survival was also longer in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (72.1%, [95% CI, 59.6-81.4] vs 50.7%, [95% CI, 38.2-62.0]; P = .031). Similar findings were found via an inverse probability weighting statistical approach. No difference was observed in terms of toxicity. In conclusion, our matched-comparison study revealed a greater efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy, with a toxicity profile for patients with TriNHL comparable with that for patients with LBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"4693-4704"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRANSCAR: real-world outcomes of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory transformed indolent lymphomas.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Stephan, Roberta Di Blasi, Louise Roulin, Jean Galtier, Julien Calvani, Véronique Meignin, Marie Donzel, Alexandra Traverse-Glehen, Elsa Poullot, Marie Parrens, Vivien Dupont, Alexandra Marquet, Steven Le Gouill, Roch Houot, Francois-Xavier Gros, François Lemonnier, Emmanuel Bachy, Catherine Thieblemont, Pierre Sesques\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown impressive results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). However, the prognostic value of the LBCL histological subtype in the context of CAR T-cell therapy is unclear. Here, we report the prognostic value of transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (TriNHL; N = 110) confirmed by an expert pathological review (LYMPHOPATH) vs de novo LBCL (N = 391) in the context of CAR T-cell therapy from 4 centers of the French DESCAR-T registry. After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 170, 85 patients with TriNHL and 85 patients with de novo LBCL), the median follow-up was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-25.1) for patients with TriNHL and 18.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.8) for patients with LBCL. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was significantly better (55.8%; 95% CI, 43.6-66.4) in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (31.7%; 95% CI, 21.4-42.6; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.82; P = .0034). The best overall response rate and complete response rate were 82.4% and 63.5%, respectively, whereas they were 63.5% and 50.6%, respectively, for the TriNHL group compared with the de novo LBCL group. The 1-year overall survival was also longer in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (72.1%, [95% CI, 59.6-81.4] vs 50.7%, [95% CI, 38.2-62.0]; P = .031). Similar findings were found via an inverse probability weighting statistical approach. No difference was observed in terms of toxicity. In conclusion, our matched-comparison study revealed a greater efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy, with a toxicity profile for patients with TriNHL comparable with that for patients with LBCL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4693-4704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015834\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015834","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
TRANSCAR: real-world outcomes of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory transformed indolent lymphomas.
Abstract: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown impressive results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). However, the prognostic value of the LBCL histological subtype in the context of CAR T-cell therapy is unclear. Here, we report the prognostic value of transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (TriNHL; N = 110) confirmed by an expert pathological review (LYMPHOPATH) vs de novo LBCL (N = 391) in the context of CAR T-cell therapy from 4 centers of the French DESCAR-T registry. After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 170, 85 patients with TriNHL and 85 patients with de novo LBCL), the median follow-up was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-25.1) for patients with TriNHL and 18.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.8) for patients with LBCL. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was significantly better (55.8%; 95% CI, 43.6-66.4) in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (31.7%; 95% CI, 21.4-42.6; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.82; P = .0034). The best overall response rate and complete response rate were 82.4% and 63.5%, respectively, whereas they were 63.5% and 50.6%, respectively, for the TriNHL group compared with the de novo LBCL group. The 1-year overall survival was also longer in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (72.1%, [95% CI, 59.6-81.4] vs 50.7%, [95% CI, 38.2-62.0]; P = .031). Similar findings were found via an inverse probability weighting statistical approach. No difference was observed in terms of toxicity. In conclusion, our matched-comparison study revealed a greater efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy, with a toxicity profile for patients with TriNHL comparable with that for patients with LBCL.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.