{"title":"即时肺超声-急诊医生在大容量急诊科治疗急性呼吸困难患者的快速可靠的诊断工具。","authors":"Irina Ciumanghel, Eliza Barbuta, Adi-Ionut Ciumanghel, Iulian Buzincu, Gabriela Grigorasi, Diana Cimpoesu","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02343-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute dyspnea is a common presenting symptom in the Emergency Department (ED). The study aims to assess the concordance between emergency physician diagnosis (i.e., initial rapid assessment at ED admission including point-of-care lung ultrasound - PoC-LUS) and attending physician diagnosis (i.e., hospital admission diagnosis which also includes CT scans) in patients presenting with dyspnea.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a prospective pilot observational study in the ED of tertiary care university hospital between 31.01.2022 and 03.09.2024. We included dyspneic patients presented when the physician involved in the study was on call.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were included (mean age, 70±16.1 years). An excellent agreement was found between emergency physician and attending physician diagnosis for all etiologies of dyspnea: pleural effusion (Cohen's kappa coefficient 1 for bilateral, 0.844 for right, 0.790 for left pleural effusion), pneumonia (κ = 0.979 for right, κ = 0.930 for left pneumonia), bronchopneumonia (κ = 0.912), acute pulmonary edema (κ = 1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (κ = 0.904), pleuropulmonary tumors (k = 0.884), acute respiratory distress syndrome - ARDS (κ = 1), (p < 0.001 for all). The median(±SD) time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis was 16(±4) minutes and the median(±SD) time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis was 480(±112) minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients presenting in the ED with dyspnea, PoC-LUS guided emergency physician diagnosis has a very good diagnosis performance. The time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis is much lower than the time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis. Given its availability, PoC-LUS is a useful tool for the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care lung ultrasound - a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for emergency physicians treating patients with acute dyspnea in high-volume emergency departments.\",\"authors\":\"Irina Ciumanghel, Eliza Barbuta, Adi-Ionut Ciumanghel, Iulian Buzincu, Gabriela Grigorasi, Diana Cimpoesu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10140-025-02343-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute dyspnea is a common presenting symptom in the Emergency Department (ED). The study aims to assess the concordance between emergency physician diagnosis (i.e., initial rapid assessment at ED admission including point-of-care lung ultrasound - PoC-LUS) and attending physician diagnosis (i.e., hospital admission diagnosis which also includes CT scans) in patients presenting with dyspnea.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a prospective pilot observational study in the ED of tertiary care university hospital between 31.01.2022 and 03.09.2024. We included dyspneic patients presented when the physician involved in the study was on call.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were included (mean age, 70±16.1 years). An excellent agreement was found between emergency physician and attending physician diagnosis for all etiologies of dyspnea: pleural effusion (Cohen's kappa coefficient 1 for bilateral, 0.844 for right, 0.790 for left pleural effusion), pneumonia (κ = 0.979 for right, κ = 0.930 for left pneumonia), bronchopneumonia (κ = 0.912), acute pulmonary edema (κ = 1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (κ = 0.904), pleuropulmonary tumors (k = 0.884), acute respiratory distress syndrome - ARDS (κ = 1), (p < 0.001 for all). The median(±SD) time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis was 16(±4) minutes and the median(±SD) time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis was 480(±112) minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients presenting in the ED with dyspnea, PoC-LUS guided emergency physician diagnosis has a very good diagnosis performance. The time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis is much lower than the time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis. Given its availability, PoC-LUS is a useful tool for the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02343-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02343-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Point-of-care lung ultrasound - a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for emergency physicians treating patients with acute dyspnea in high-volume emergency departments.
Purpose: Acute dyspnea is a common presenting symptom in the Emergency Department (ED). The study aims to assess the concordance between emergency physician diagnosis (i.e., initial rapid assessment at ED admission including point-of-care lung ultrasound - PoC-LUS) and attending physician diagnosis (i.e., hospital admission diagnosis which also includes CT scans) in patients presenting with dyspnea.
Method: We performed a prospective pilot observational study in the ED of tertiary care university hospital between 31.01.2022 and 03.09.2024. We included dyspneic patients presented when the physician involved in the study was on call.
Results: A total of 103 patients were included (mean age, 70±16.1 years). An excellent agreement was found between emergency physician and attending physician diagnosis for all etiologies of dyspnea: pleural effusion (Cohen's kappa coefficient 1 for bilateral, 0.844 for right, 0.790 for left pleural effusion), pneumonia (κ = 0.979 for right, κ = 0.930 for left pneumonia), bronchopneumonia (κ = 0.912), acute pulmonary edema (κ = 1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (κ = 0.904), pleuropulmonary tumors (k = 0.884), acute respiratory distress syndrome - ARDS (κ = 1), (p < 0.001 for all). The median(±SD) time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis was 16(±4) minutes and the median(±SD) time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis was 480(±112) minutes.
Conclusion: In patients presenting in the ED with dyspnea, PoC-LUS guided emergency physician diagnosis has a very good diagnosis performance. The time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis is much lower than the time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis. Given its availability, PoC-LUS is a useful tool for the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea.
期刊介绍:
To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!