心脏手术室空气质量的微生物监测:传统沉降板技术与空气采样装置的比较

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.4103/aca.aca_200_24
Alok Kumar, Prashant Patil, Abhinay Ankur, Nihar Ameta, Monika Aggarwal
{"title":"心脏手术室空气质量的微生物监测:传统沉降板技术与空气采样装置的比较","authors":"Alok Kumar, Prashant Patil, Abhinay Ankur, Nihar Ameta, Monika Aggarwal","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_200_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSIs) after cardiac surgery poses a serious challenge. The foremost reason for contamination in operating rooms (OR) is airborne. Effective surveillance by air sampling or settle techniques is crucial in maintenance of air quality in cardiac OR.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The air quality of two different cardiac OR (adult and pediatric) with laminar air flow system and HEPA filters in place was studied with an aim to compare the plate and air sampling technique. Sampling was done both passive and actively using a Surface Air System air sampler. Muller Hinton Agar plates incubated at 36 °C were used, and total viable count assessment was calculated using Koch's sedimentation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts showed significant differences at various time points in both adult and pediatric OR. The settle plate as compared to the air sampling device correlated but showed lesser CFUs across pre, mid, and postsurgical periods (P < 0.05). The adult cardiac OR had significantly higher bioload than pediatric OR (P < 0.05). The results suggested that both the technique was good for air quality monitoring in OR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study compares the two-sampling technique in adult and pediatric cardiac OR, finding higher levels of bioload in adult ORs possibly due to more personnel and longer surgeries. Although settle plates offer basic contamination assessment, air samplers detect specific events efficiently. Using either air sampler or settle plate technique for microbial surveillance in cardiac ORs is suggested for monitoring and prevention of SSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":"28 2","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological Surveillance of Air Quality in Cardiac Operation Theatres: Comparison of the Conventional Settle Plate Technique vs Use of an Air Sampling Device.\",\"authors\":\"Alok Kumar, Prashant Patil, Abhinay Ankur, Nihar Ameta, Monika Aggarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aca.aca_200_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSIs) after cardiac surgery poses a serious challenge. The foremost reason for contamination in operating rooms (OR) is airborne. Effective surveillance by air sampling or settle techniques is crucial in maintenance of air quality in cardiac OR.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The air quality of two different cardiac OR (adult and pediatric) with laminar air flow system and HEPA filters in place was studied with an aim to compare the plate and air sampling technique. Sampling was done both passive and actively using a Surface Air System air sampler. Muller Hinton Agar plates incubated at 36 °C were used, and total viable count assessment was calculated using Koch's sedimentation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts showed significant differences at various time points in both adult and pediatric OR. The settle plate as compared to the air sampling device correlated but showed lesser CFUs across pre, mid, and postsurgical periods (P < 0.05). The adult cardiac OR had significantly higher bioload than pediatric OR (P < 0.05). The results suggested that both the technique was good for air quality monitoring in OR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study compares the two-sampling technique in adult and pediatric cardiac OR, finding higher levels of bioload in adult ORs possibly due to more personnel and longer surgeries. Although settle plates offer basic contamination assessment, air samplers detect specific events efficiently. Using either air sampler or settle plate technique for microbial surveillance in cardiac ORs is suggested for monitoring and prevention of SSI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"156-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_200_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_200_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏手术后手术部位感染(ssi)是一个严峻的挑战。手术室污染的首要原因是空气传播。通过空气采样或沉降技术进行有效监测对于维持心脏手术室的空气质量至关重要。方法:研究两种不同的心脏手术室(成人和儿童)的空气质量,层流空气系统和HEPA过滤器到位,目的是比较板和空气采样技术。使用地面空气系统空气采样器进行被动和主动采样。采用36℃孵育的Muller Hinton琼脂板,采用Koch沉淀法计算总活菌数。结果:在成人和儿童手术室中,菌落形成单位(CFU)计数在不同时间点显示出显著差异。与空气取样装置相比,固定板相关,但在手术前、中期和术后显示较小的cfu (P < 0.05)。成人心脏手术室的生物负荷显著高于儿童手术室(P < 0.05)。结果表明,两种方法均可用于手术室空气质量监测。结论:该研究比较了成人和儿童心脏手术室的双采样技术,发现成人手术室的生物负荷水平较高可能是由于人员较多和手术时间较长。虽然沉降板提供基本的污染评估,但空气采样器可以有效地检测特定事件。建议使用空气采样器或沉降板技术监测心脏手术室的微生物,以监测和预防SSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbiological Surveillance of Air Quality in Cardiac Operation Theatres: Comparison of the Conventional Settle Plate Technique vs Use of an Air Sampling Device.

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after cardiac surgery poses a serious challenge. The foremost reason for contamination in operating rooms (OR) is airborne. Effective surveillance by air sampling or settle techniques is crucial in maintenance of air quality in cardiac OR.

Methodology: The air quality of two different cardiac OR (adult and pediatric) with laminar air flow system and HEPA filters in place was studied with an aim to compare the plate and air sampling technique. Sampling was done both passive and actively using a Surface Air System air sampler. Muller Hinton Agar plates incubated at 36 °C were used, and total viable count assessment was calculated using Koch's sedimentation method.

Results: Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts showed significant differences at various time points in both adult and pediatric OR. The settle plate as compared to the air sampling device correlated but showed lesser CFUs across pre, mid, and postsurgical periods (P < 0.05). The adult cardiac OR had significantly higher bioload than pediatric OR (P < 0.05). The results suggested that both the technique was good for air quality monitoring in OR.

Conclusion: The study compares the two-sampling technique in adult and pediatric cardiac OR, finding higher levels of bioload in adult ORs possibly due to more personnel and longer surgeries. Although settle plates offer basic contamination assessment, air samplers detect specific events efficiently. Using either air sampler or settle plate technique for microbial surveillance in cardiac ORs is suggested for monitoring and prevention of SSI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信