同种异体乳房重建与自体乳房重建后的生活质量:患者特征对结果的影响。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1159/000543677
Iris L Holt-Kedde, Nadia Sadok, Irene S Krabbe-Timmerman, Geertruida H de Bock, Grigory Sidorenkov, Paul M N Werker
{"title":"同种异体乳房重建与自体乳房重建后的生活质量:患者特征对结果的影响。","authors":"Iris L Holt-Kedde, Nadia Sadok, Irene S Krabbe-Timmerman, Geertruida H de Bock, Grigory Sidorenkov, Paul M N Werker","doi":"10.1159/000543677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) following autologous breast reconstruction has been found to be higher compared to alloplastic breast reconstruction. However, evaluating QoL is complex as it is influenced by various factors, including patient characteristics and treatment types. Previous studies comparing QoL between reconstruction techniques have not sufficiently addressed baseline differences between patient groups, some of which contribute to indication bias. Using an alternative approach to identify the confounders, this study aimed to evaluate which factors affect the patient satisfaction and QoL after alloplastic or autologous reconstruction, with follow-up extending up to 3 years post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>QoL and satisfaction were measured using the Breast-Q preoperatively and after breast reconstruction (post-BR) at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. General and mental health were measured using the SF-36 and the HADS. A generalized linear mixed model was utilized to assess which factors confound the relationship between reconstruction technique and Breast-Q scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors contributing to the disparity in Breast-Q scores between autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction varied across Breast-Q subscales. Autologous breast reconstruction patients consistently reported higher \"Satisfaction with Breasts\" and \"Physical Well-being,\" while the minimal important differences in \"Psychosocial\" and \"Sexual Well-being\" were lost after adjustment for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms that even when adjusted for confounders, scores on two QoL subscales autologous breast reconstruction patients score significantly higher over time. Although autologous reconstruction remained superior regarding \"Satisfaction with Breasts,\" scores decreased in autologous reconstruction patients when they were depressed at baseline, underwent radiotherapy, had a history of breast cancer, or faced major complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"20 2","pages":"95-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life after Alloplastic versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction: The Influence of Patient Characteristics on Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Iris L Holt-Kedde, Nadia Sadok, Irene S Krabbe-Timmerman, Geertruida H de Bock, Grigory Sidorenkov, Paul M N Werker\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) following autologous breast reconstruction has been found to be higher compared to alloplastic breast reconstruction. However, evaluating QoL is complex as it is influenced by various factors, including patient characteristics and treatment types. Previous studies comparing QoL between reconstruction techniques have not sufficiently addressed baseline differences between patient groups, some of which contribute to indication bias. Using an alternative approach to identify the confounders, this study aimed to evaluate which factors affect the patient satisfaction and QoL after alloplastic or autologous reconstruction, with follow-up extending up to 3 years post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>QoL and satisfaction were measured using the Breast-Q preoperatively and after breast reconstruction (post-BR) at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. General and mental health were measured using the SF-36 and the HADS. A generalized linear mixed model was utilized to assess which factors confound the relationship between reconstruction technique and Breast-Q scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors contributing to the disparity in Breast-Q scores between autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction varied across Breast-Q subscales. Autologous breast reconstruction patients consistently reported higher \\\"Satisfaction with Breasts\\\" and \\\"Physical Well-being,\\\" while the minimal important differences in \\\"Psychosocial\\\" and \\\"Sexual Well-being\\\" were lost after adjustment for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms that even when adjusted for confounders, scores on two QoL subscales autologous breast reconstruction patients score significantly higher over time. Although autologous reconstruction remained superior regarding \\\"Satisfaction with Breasts,\\\" scores decreased in autologous reconstruction patients when they were depressed at baseline, underwent radiotherapy, had a history of breast cancer, or faced major complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Care\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"95-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543677\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自体乳房再造术后的生活质量(QoL)高于同种异体乳房再造术。然而,生活质量的评估是复杂的,因为它受到各种因素的影响,包括患者的特点和治疗类型。先前比较重建技术之间生活质量的研究没有充分解决患者组之间的基线差异,其中一些导致了指征偏倚。采用另一种方法识别混杂因素,本研究旨在评估影响同种异体或自体重建后患者满意度和生活质量的因素,随访时间长达术后3年。方法:分别于术后6周、6个月、1年、3年采用breast - q法测定患者的生活质量和满意度。一般健康和心理健康使用SF-36和HADS进行测量。采用广义线性混合模型来评估哪些因素混淆了重建技术与Breast-Q评分之间的关系。结果:导致自体乳房重建和同种异体乳房重建之间breast - q评分差异的因素在breast - q亚量表中存在差异。自体乳房重建患者一致报告更高的“乳房满意度”和“身体健康”,而“社会心理”和“性健康”的最小重要差异在调整混杂因素后消失。结论:本研究证实,即使对混杂因素进行调整,自体乳房重建患者的两个生活质量亚量表得分也会随着时间的推移而显著提高。尽管自体重建术在“乳房满意度”方面仍然优于自体重建术,但在基线抑郁、接受放疗、有乳腺癌病史或面临主要并发症的患者中,自体重建术的评分会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Life after Alloplastic versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction: The Influence of Patient Characteristics on Outcomes.

Objective: Quality of life (QoL) following autologous breast reconstruction has been found to be higher compared to alloplastic breast reconstruction. However, evaluating QoL is complex as it is influenced by various factors, including patient characteristics and treatment types. Previous studies comparing QoL between reconstruction techniques have not sufficiently addressed baseline differences between patient groups, some of which contribute to indication bias. Using an alternative approach to identify the confounders, this study aimed to evaluate which factors affect the patient satisfaction and QoL after alloplastic or autologous reconstruction, with follow-up extending up to 3 years post-surgery.

Method: QoL and satisfaction were measured using the Breast-Q preoperatively and after breast reconstruction (post-BR) at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. General and mental health were measured using the SF-36 and the HADS. A generalized linear mixed model was utilized to assess which factors confound the relationship between reconstruction technique and Breast-Q scores.

Results: Factors contributing to the disparity in Breast-Q scores between autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction varied across Breast-Q subscales. Autologous breast reconstruction patients consistently reported higher "Satisfaction with Breasts" and "Physical Well-being," while the minimal important differences in "Psychosocial" and "Sexual Well-being" were lost after adjustment for confounding factors.

Conclusion: This study confirms that even when adjusted for confounders, scores on two QoL subscales autologous breast reconstruction patients score significantly higher over time. Although autologous reconstruction remained superior regarding "Satisfaction with Breasts," scores decreased in autologous reconstruction patients when they were depressed at baseline, underwent radiotherapy, had a history of breast cancer, or faced major complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信