对农村无保险的2型糖尿病患者进行食品素养和烹饪医学教育的农产品处方(PRx)项目评估。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Brandon J Stroud, Lauren R Sastre
{"title":"对农村无保险的2型糖尿病患者进行食品素养和烹饪医学教育的农产品处方(PRx)项目评估。","authors":"Brandon J Stroud, Lauren R Sastre","doi":"10.1177/08901171251340385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeProduce prescription (PRx) programs improve the nutrition and health of participants; however, best practices to optimize and sustain dietary changes have not been established. This study examined the acceptability and impact of food literacy and culinary education aligned with a PRx.DesignSingle-group pre-post design, process evaluation.Setting4 primary care safety-net clinics.Subjects150 rural, uninsured patients with type-2 diabetes.Intervention20-week PRx intervention with 9 food literacy and culinary-focused group classes.MeasuresAttendance, satisfaction, knowledge, food purchasing and consumption changes, food literacy scores, diet changes.AnalysisClosed-ended survey responses and sociodemographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically. Paired Sample t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared pre- vs post-food literacy scores and diet changes; multiple linear regression examined the effect of program participation on food literacy scores.ResultsTaste testing had the greatest influence on food behavior changes followed by the PRx and nutrition education. Food literacy significantly increased (89.1 (19.5) to 100.9 (19.5)), (<i>P</i> < .001) and was positively predicted by group class attendance (B = 1.366, P = .044). Diet quality improved (whole grains, <i>P</i> < .001, fruits, <i>P</i> = .03, and vegetables, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionFood literacy and culinary-focused nutrition education within a PRx amplified healthy food behavior changes and should be examined for long-term effectiveness in promoting and sustaining dietary changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251340385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Produce Prescription (PRx) Program With Food Literacy and Culinary Medicine Education for Rural, Uninsured Patients With Type-2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon J Stroud, Lauren R Sastre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251340385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeProduce prescription (PRx) programs improve the nutrition and health of participants; however, best practices to optimize and sustain dietary changes have not been established. This study examined the acceptability and impact of food literacy and culinary education aligned with a PRx.DesignSingle-group pre-post design, process evaluation.Setting4 primary care safety-net clinics.Subjects150 rural, uninsured patients with type-2 diabetes.Intervention20-week PRx intervention with 9 food literacy and culinary-focused group classes.MeasuresAttendance, satisfaction, knowledge, food purchasing and consumption changes, food literacy scores, diet changes.AnalysisClosed-ended survey responses and sociodemographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically. Paired Sample t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared pre- vs post-food literacy scores and diet changes; multiple linear regression examined the effect of program participation on food literacy scores.ResultsTaste testing had the greatest influence on food behavior changes followed by the PRx and nutrition education. Food literacy significantly increased (89.1 (19.5) to 100.9 (19.5)), (<i>P</i> < .001) and was positively predicted by group class attendance (B = 1.366, P = .044). Diet quality improved (whole grains, <i>P</i> < .001, fruits, <i>P</i> = .03, and vegetables, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionFood literacy and culinary-focused nutrition education within a PRx amplified healthy food behavior changes and should be examined for long-term effectiveness in promoting and sustaining dietary changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251340385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251340385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251340385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生产处方(PRx)计划改善参与者的营养和健康;然而,优化和维持饮食变化的最佳做法尚未确立。这项研究考察了食品素养和烹饪教育与PRx相一致的可接受性和影响。设计单组前后设计,工艺评价。建立初级保健安全网诊所。研究对象为150名农村无保险的2型糖尿病患者。干预:为期20周的PRx干预,包括9个食物素养和以烹饪为重点的小组课程。测量方法:出勤率、满意度、知识、食品购买和消费变化、食品素养得分、饮食变化。分析使用描述性统计分析封闭式调查结果和社会人口统计学。对开放式回答进行主题分析。配对样本t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了食物前和食物后的读写能力得分和饮食变化;多元线性回归检验了项目参与对食品素养得分的影响。结果味觉测试对饮食行为的影响最大,其次是PRx和营养教育。食品素养显著提高(89.1(19.5)至100.9 (19.5))(P < 0.001),并与小组班级出勤率呈正相关(B = 1.366, P = 0.044)。饮食质量提高(全谷物,P < .001,水果,P = .03,蔬菜,P < .001)。结论食品素养和以烹饪为重点的营养教育促进了健康饮食行为的改变,在促进和维持饮食改变方面应进行长期研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a Produce Prescription (PRx) Program With Food Literacy and Culinary Medicine Education for Rural, Uninsured Patients With Type-2 Diabetes.

PurposeProduce prescription (PRx) programs improve the nutrition and health of participants; however, best practices to optimize and sustain dietary changes have not been established. This study examined the acceptability and impact of food literacy and culinary education aligned with a PRx.DesignSingle-group pre-post design, process evaluation.Setting4 primary care safety-net clinics.Subjects150 rural, uninsured patients with type-2 diabetes.Intervention20-week PRx intervention with 9 food literacy and culinary-focused group classes.MeasuresAttendance, satisfaction, knowledge, food purchasing and consumption changes, food literacy scores, diet changes.AnalysisClosed-ended survey responses and sociodemographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically. Paired Sample t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared pre- vs post-food literacy scores and diet changes; multiple linear regression examined the effect of program participation on food literacy scores.ResultsTaste testing had the greatest influence on food behavior changes followed by the PRx and nutrition education. Food literacy significantly increased (89.1 (19.5) to 100.9 (19.5)), (P < .001) and was positively predicted by group class attendance (B = 1.366, P = .044). Diet quality improved (whole grains, P < .001, fruits, P = .03, and vegetables, P < .001).ConclusionFood literacy and culinary-focused nutrition education within a PRx amplified healthy food behavior changes and should be examined for long-term effectiveness in promoting and sustaining dietary changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信