妇产科住院医师照顾身体残疾孕妇的舒适度。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Susan Carlson, Audrey Aitelli, Sarah Dotters-Katz, Claire Kalpakjian
{"title":"妇产科住院医师照顾身体残疾孕妇的舒适度。","authors":"Susan Carlson, Audrey Aitelli, Sarah Dotters-Katz, Claire Kalpakjian","doi":"10.1055/a-2588-4900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnant people with disabilities face higher complication rates, yet few guidelines exist on caring for this population. This study evaluates obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents' comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities.A 19-question e-survey was developed and piloted for content and face validation. Likert scale was used to assess comfort in caring for pregnant patients with physical disabilities. The e-survey was sent to U.S. OBGYN residents via CREOG-coordinator listserv, a listserv to all U.S. OBGYN residency coordinators, in February 2024, with three reminder emails. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and variables with clinical and statistical significance were considered for adjustment in regression models.Eighty-eight residents completed the survey. The mean age was 29 years; 88% identified as female. All ACOG regions were represented. Eight and 44% reported formal education on disability care in residency and medical school, respectively. Seventy-three percent felt uncomfortable positioning disabled patients for a pelvic examination, 59% felt uncomfortable discussing sexual health practices, and 89% felt uncomfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery. Those without education in residency were 91% less likely to be comfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery (absolute risk reduction [aRR]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 and 0.59). Only 30% were comfortable discussing lactation/breastfeeding with patients with physical disabilities; residents without personal experience including caring for family members or friends or other caretaking experiences were 66% less likely to be comfortable (aRR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12 and 0.99). A total of 92.5% of residents wanted more education in this space. Of those 83, 71, and 82% desired didactics, patient panels, and simulations, respectively.Among responding residents, comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities is low. Additional training is necessary to adequately care for this population. · OBGYN resident comfort with disability care is low.. · Few residents receive formal disability training.. · Formal education improves disability care comfort..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Comfort in Caring for Pregnant People with Physical Disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Susan Carlson, Audrey Aitelli, Sarah Dotters-Katz, Claire Kalpakjian\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2588-4900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pregnant people with disabilities face higher complication rates, yet few guidelines exist on caring for this population. This study evaluates obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents' comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities.A 19-question e-survey was developed and piloted for content and face validation. Likert scale was used to assess comfort in caring for pregnant patients with physical disabilities. The e-survey was sent to U.S. OBGYN residents via CREOG-coordinator listserv, a listserv to all U.S. OBGYN residency coordinators, in February 2024, with three reminder emails. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and variables with clinical and statistical significance were considered for adjustment in regression models.Eighty-eight residents completed the survey. The mean age was 29 years; 88% identified as female. All ACOG regions were represented. Eight and 44% reported formal education on disability care in residency and medical school, respectively. Seventy-three percent felt uncomfortable positioning disabled patients for a pelvic examination, 59% felt uncomfortable discussing sexual health practices, and 89% felt uncomfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery. Those without education in residency were 91% less likely to be comfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery (absolute risk reduction [aRR]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 and 0.59). Only 30% were comfortable discussing lactation/breastfeeding with patients with physical disabilities; residents without personal experience including caring for family members or friends or other caretaking experiences were 66% less likely to be comfortable (aRR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12 and 0.99). A total of 92.5% of residents wanted more education in this space. Of those 83, 71, and 82% desired didactics, patient panels, and simulations, respectively.Among responding residents, comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities is low. Additional training is necessary to adequately care for this population. · OBGYN resident comfort with disability care is low.. · Few residents receive formal disability training.. · Formal education improves disability care comfort..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2588-4900\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2588-4900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

残疾孕妇面临更高的并发症发生率,但目前关于护理这一人群的指南很少。本研究评估妇产科住院医师照顾身体残疾孕妇的舒适度。开发并试点了一项包含19个问题的电子调查,用于内容和面部验证。采用李克特量表评估孕妇身体残疾患者护理舒适度。该电子调查于2024年2月通过CREOG-coordinator listserv发送给美国妇产科医生,CREOG-coordinator listserv是一个面向所有美国妇产科医生的listserv,并附带三封提醒邮件。采用描述性统计对数据进行分析,并考虑具有临床和统计学意义的变量对回归模型进行调整。88名居民完成了调查。平均年龄29岁;88%被认定为女性。所有ACOG区域都有代表。8%和44%分别报告在住院医师和医学院接受过残疾护理方面的正规教育。73%的人在给残疾患者做盆腔检查时感到不舒服,59%的人在讨论性健康习惯时感到不舒服,89%的人在建议分娩方式时感到不舒服。未接受住院医师教育的患者对分娩方式提出建议的可能性降低91%(绝对风险降低[aRR]: 0.09;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.01和0.59)。只有30%的人愿意与身体残疾的患者讨论哺乳/母乳喂养;没有个人经验,包括照顾家人或朋友或其他照顾经验的居民,66%不太可能感到舒适(aRR: 0.34;95% CI: 0.12和0.99)。共有92.5%的居民希望在这一领域获得更多的教育。在这些人中,分别有83%、71%和82%的人希望进行教学、患者分组和模拟。在回应的居民中,照顾身体残疾孕妇的舒适度较低。为充分照顾这一人群,需要额外的培训。·妇产科住院医师对残疾护理的满意度很低。·很少有居民接受过正式的残疾培训。·正规教育提高了残疾人护理的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Comfort in Caring for Pregnant People with Physical Disabilities.

Pregnant people with disabilities face higher complication rates, yet few guidelines exist on caring for this population. This study evaluates obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents' comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities.A 19-question e-survey was developed and piloted for content and face validation. Likert scale was used to assess comfort in caring for pregnant patients with physical disabilities. The e-survey was sent to U.S. OBGYN residents via CREOG-coordinator listserv, a listserv to all U.S. OBGYN residency coordinators, in February 2024, with three reminder emails. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and variables with clinical and statistical significance were considered for adjustment in regression models.Eighty-eight residents completed the survey. The mean age was 29 years; 88% identified as female. All ACOG regions were represented. Eight and 44% reported formal education on disability care in residency and medical school, respectively. Seventy-three percent felt uncomfortable positioning disabled patients for a pelvic examination, 59% felt uncomfortable discussing sexual health practices, and 89% felt uncomfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery. Those without education in residency were 91% less likely to be comfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery (absolute risk reduction [aRR]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 and 0.59). Only 30% were comfortable discussing lactation/breastfeeding with patients with physical disabilities; residents without personal experience including caring for family members or friends or other caretaking experiences were 66% less likely to be comfortable (aRR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12 and 0.99). A total of 92.5% of residents wanted more education in this space. Of those 83, 71, and 82% desired didactics, patient panels, and simulations, respectively.Among responding residents, comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities is low. Additional training is necessary to adequately care for this population. · OBGYN resident comfort with disability care is low.. · Few residents receive formal disability training.. · Formal education improves disability care comfort..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信