英国小动物辐射研究平台(SARRP)设施的剂量学质量保证实践调查。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Emma R Biglin, Ileana Silvestre Patallo, Anna Morris, Rebecca Carter, Emer Curley, Mihaela Ghita-Pettigrew, Mark Hill, Thierry L Lefebvre, David Lewis, Simeon Nill, Giuseppe Schettino, Katrina Stevenson, Adam H Aitkenhead
{"title":"英国小动物辐射研究平台(SARRP)设施的剂量学质量保证实践调查。","authors":"Emma R Biglin, Ileana Silvestre Patallo, Anna Morris, Rebecca Carter, Emer Curley, Mihaela Ghita-Pettigrew, Mark Hill, Thierry L Lefebvre, David Lewis, Simeon Nill, Giuseppe Schettino, Katrina Stevenson, Adam H Aitkenhead","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adcc35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: Improvements in preclinical radiation research have been made to better mimic the equipment and techniques implemented in the clinic. The development of dedicated small animal radiation units facilitates such advances by combining treatment planning, image guidance and conformal delivery. One area significantly behind its clinical equivalent are standardised dosimetry quality assurance (QA) protocols, hampering the translatability of results into the development of clinical interventions.<i>Approach</i>: The aim of the study described herein was to summarise the current QA procedures implemented at several institutions on Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs), the system used by the six institutions surveyed, and to determine the barriers to implementing a standard dosimetry protocol. Participants at UK research institutions were invited to complete a questionnaire to ascertain their current preclinical QA practice.<i>Main results</i>: All participants involved undertake regular dose output measurements and most perform image guidance QA measurements. Consistency in QA procedures differed when more complex plan verification or end-to-end testing was discussed.<i>Significance</i>: This survey demonstrates that, although improvements are being made in the awareness of the importance of regular dosimetry tests, there is still a way to go to standardise the procedures with regards to more complex verifications. Incorporating robust QA procedures and strict dose constraints would ensure the reliability and ethical integrity of experiments involving small animals. This approach not only protects the welfare of the animals but also enhances the quality and reproducibility of the preclinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of dosimetry quality assurance practice at UK small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Emma R Biglin, Ileana Silvestre Patallo, Anna Morris, Rebecca Carter, Emer Curley, Mihaela Ghita-Pettigrew, Mark Hill, Thierry L Lefebvre, David Lewis, Simeon Nill, Giuseppe Schettino, Katrina Stevenson, Adam H Aitkenhead\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/adcc35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: Improvements in preclinical radiation research have been made to better mimic the equipment and techniques implemented in the clinic. The development of dedicated small animal radiation units facilitates such advances by combining treatment planning, image guidance and conformal delivery. One area significantly behind its clinical equivalent are standardised dosimetry quality assurance (QA) protocols, hampering the translatability of results into the development of clinical interventions.<i>Approach</i>: The aim of the study described herein was to summarise the current QA procedures implemented at several institutions on Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs), the system used by the six institutions surveyed, and to determine the barriers to implementing a standard dosimetry protocol. Participants at UK research institutions were invited to complete a questionnaire to ascertain their current preclinical QA practice.<i>Main results</i>: All participants involved undertake regular dose output measurements and most perform image guidance QA measurements. Consistency in QA procedures differed when more complex plan verification or end-to-end testing was discussed.<i>Significance</i>: This survey demonstrates that, although improvements are being made in the awareness of the importance of regular dosimetry tests, there is still a way to go to standardise the procedures with regards to more complex verifications. Incorporating robust QA procedures and strict dose constraints would ensure the reliability and ethical integrity of experiments involving small animals. This approach not only protects the welfare of the animals but also enhances the quality and reproducibility of the preclinical results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adcc35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adcc35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:临床前放射研究已经取得了进步,以便更好地模仿临床中实施的设备和技术。专用小动物放射单元的发展通过结合治疗计划、图像引导和适形传递促进了这种进步。标准化剂量学质量保证(QA)协议是其临床等效性的一个显著落后领域,阻碍了将结果转化为临床干预措施的发展。方法:本文描述的研究目的是总结几个机构在小动物辐射研究平台(sarrp)上实施的当前质量保证程序,该系统被调查的六个机构使用,并确定实施标准剂量学方案的障碍。英国研究机构的参与者被邀请完成一份调查问卷,以确定他们目前的临床前质量保证实践。主要结果:所有参与者都进行常规剂量输出测量,大多数进行图像引导QA测量。当讨论更复杂的计划验证或端到端测试时,QA过程的一致性会有所不同。意义:这项调查表明,尽管人们对定期剂量测定试验重要性的认识有所提高,但在更复杂的核查方面,仍有一段路要走,使程序标准化。纳入健全的质量保证程序和严格的剂量限制将确保涉及小动物的实验的可靠性和道德完整性。这种方法不仅保护了动物的福利,而且提高了临床前结果的质量和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of dosimetry quality assurance practice at UK small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) facilities.

Introduction: Improvements in preclinical radiation research have been made to better mimic the equipment and techniques implemented in the clinic. The development of dedicated small animal radiation units facilitates such advances by combining treatment planning, image guidance and conformal delivery. One area significantly behind its clinical equivalent are standardised dosimetry quality assurance (QA) protocols, hampering the translatability of results into the development of clinical interventions.Approach: The aim of the study described herein was to summarise the current QA procedures implemented at several institutions on Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs), the system used by the six institutions surveyed, and to determine the barriers to implementing a standard dosimetry protocol. Participants at UK research institutions were invited to complete a questionnaire to ascertain their current preclinical QA practice.Main results: All participants involved undertake regular dose output measurements and most perform image guidance QA measurements. Consistency in QA procedures differed when more complex plan verification or end-to-end testing was discussed.Significance: This survey demonstrates that, although improvements are being made in the awareness of the importance of regular dosimetry tests, there is still a way to go to standardise the procedures with regards to more complex verifications. Incorporating robust QA procedures and strict dose constraints would ensure the reliability and ethical integrity of experiments involving small animals. This approach not only protects the welfare of the animals but also enhances the quality and reproducibility of the preclinical results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信