埃及革兰氏阴性菌中粘菌素耐药性的流行、趋势和分子洞察:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Ahmed Azzam, Haitham Salem, Mahmoud Nazih, Enas Mohamed Lotfy, Fatma E Hassan, Heba Khaled
{"title":"埃及革兰氏阴性菌中粘菌素耐药性的流行、趋势和分子洞察:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ahmed Azzam, Haitham Salem, Mahmoud Nazih, Enas Mohamed Lotfy, Fatma E Hassan, Heba Khaled","doi":"10.1186/s12941-025-00799-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria in Egypt, analyzing prevalence, trends, geographic variations, colistin-carbapenem resistance correlation, and mcr-mediated plasmid resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of articles published between 2014 and 2024 that reported on colistin or mcr-mediated resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from human infections in Egypt, with clearly defined susceptibility testing methods. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate colistin resistance prevalence based on broth microdilution (BMD) findings, the gold standard method. To explore the influence of study-level factors-including alternative susceptibility testing methods-a multivariate meta-regression analysis was performed. The results of the meta-regression are reported as regression coefficients (β), representing the difference in colistin resistance, expressed in percentage points. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 55 studies. Based on BMD susceptibility testing, colistin resistance was observed in 9% of all recovered Gram-negative isolates (95% CI: 6-14%) and was significantly higher among carbapenem-resistant isolates (31%, 95% CI: 25-38%), with p < 0.001. Multivariate meta-regression analysis further confirmed that colistin resistance was significantly higher in carbapenem-resistant isolates compared to the total recovered isolates (β = 9.8% points, p = 0.001). Additionally, colistin resistance has significantly increased over time, with a β = 1.8% points per year (p = 0.001). The use of the VITEK 2 system was associated with lower detected colistin resistance compared to BMD (β = -7.0, p = 0.02). Geographically, resistance rates were higher in Upper Egypt (β = 9.3, p = 0.04). Regarding mcr plasmid-mediated resistance, mcr-1 was the most prevalent resistance gene, particularly in E. coli. In contrast, mcr-2 was rare, detected sporadically in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Egypt, BMD testing identified colistin resistance in 9% of Gram-negative bacteria, increasing to 31% in carbapenem-resistant isolates. This higher resistance in carbapenem-resistant strains suggests stronger selective pressure from frequent colistin use. Additionally, colistin resistance has shown a rising trend over time, likely driven by increased usage and the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance. These findings underscore the urgent need for strict antimicrobial stewardship and alternative therapies to curb resistance evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":8052,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","volume":"24 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence, trends, and molecular insights into colistin resistance among gram-negative bacteria in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Azzam, Haitham Salem, Mahmoud Nazih, Enas Mohamed Lotfy, Fatma E Hassan, Heba Khaled\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12941-025-00799-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria in Egypt, analyzing prevalence, trends, geographic variations, colistin-carbapenem resistance correlation, and mcr-mediated plasmid resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of articles published between 2014 and 2024 that reported on colistin or mcr-mediated resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from human infections in Egypt, with clearly defined susceptibility testing methods. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate colistin resistance prevalence based on broth microdilution (BMD) findings, the gold standard method. To explore the influence of study-level factors-including alternative susceptibility testing methods-a multivariate meta-regression analysis was performed. The results of the meta-regression are reported as regression coefficients (β), representing the difference in colistin resistance, expressed in percentage points. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 55 studies. Based on BMD susceptibility testing, colistin resistance was observed in 9% of all recovered Gram-negative isolates (95% CI: 6-14%) and was significantly higher among carbapenem-resistant isolates (31%, 95% CI: 25-38%), with p < 0.001. Multivariate meta-regression analysis further confirmed that colistin resistance was significantly higher in carbapenem-resistant isolates compared to the total recovered isolates (β = 9.8% points, p = 0.001). Additionally, colistin resistance has significantly increased over time, with a β = 1.8% points per year (p = 0.001). The use of the VITEK 2 system was associated with lower detected colistin resistance compared to BMD (β = -7.0, p = 0.02). Geographically, resistance rates were higher in Upper Egypt (β = 9.3, p = 0.04). Regarding mcr plasmid-mediated resistance, mcr-1 was the most prevalent resistance gene, particularly in E. coli. In contrast, mcr-2 was rare, detected sporadically in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Egypt, BMD testing identified colistin resistance in 9% of Gram-negative bacteria, increasing to 31% in carbapenem-resistant isolates. This higher resistance in carbapenem-resistant strains suggests stronger selective pressure from frequent colistin use. Additionally, colistin resistance has shown a rising trend over time, likely driven by increased usage and the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance. These findings underscore the urgent need for strict antimicrobial stewardship and alternative therapies to curb resistance evolution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00799-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00799-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究调查了埃及革兰氏阴性菌的粘菌素耐药性,分析了流行率、趋势、地理差异、粘菌素-碳青霉烯类耐药相关性以及mcr介导的质粒耐药。方法:我们系统检索了2014年至2024年间发表的关于埃及人感染中分离的革兰氏阴性菌中粘菌素或mcr介导耐药的文章,并明确了药敏试验方法。随机效应荟萃分析是基于肉汤微量稀释(BMD)结果(金标准方法)来估计粘菌素耐药性的流行情况。为了探讨研究水平因素的影响,包括替代药敏试验方法,进行了多变量元回归分析。meta回归的结果以回归系数(β)报告,代表粘菌素耐药性的差异,以百分点表示。所有统计分析均采用R软件进行。结果:本分析包括55项研究。根据BMD药敏试验,在所有回收的革兰氏阴性菌株中,9%的菌株对粘菌素耐药(95% CI: 6-14%),而在碳青霉烯耐药的菌株中,粘菌素耐药率明显更高(31%,95% CI: 25-38%)。结论:在埃及,BMD检测发现革兰氏阴性菌中有9%对粘菌素耐药,在碳青霉烯耐药的菌株中增加到31%。碳青霉烯耐药菌株的高耐药性表明频繁使用粘菌素的选择压力更大。此外,随着时间的推移,粘菌素耐药性呈上升趋势,可能是由于使用增加和质粒介导的耐药性传播所致。这些发现强调迫切需要严格的抗菌药物管理和替代疗法来遏制耐药性的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence, trends, and molecular insights into colistin resistance among gram-negative bacteria in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This study examines colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria in Egypt, analyzing prevalence, trends, geographic variations, colistin-carbapenem resistance correlation, and mcr-mediated plasmid resistance.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles published between 2014 and 2024 that reported on colistin or mcr-mediated resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from human infections in Egypt, with clearly defined susceptibility testing methods. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate colistin resistance prevalence based on broth microdilution (BMD) findings, the gold standard method. To explore the influence of study-level factors-including alternative susceptibility testing methods-a multivariate meta-regression analysis was performed. The results of the meta-regression are reported as regression coefficients (β), representing the difference in colistin resistance, expressed in percentage points. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software.

Results: This analysis included 55 studies. Based on BMD susceptibility testing, colistin resistance was observed in 9% of all recovered Gram-negative isolates (95% CI: 6-14%) and was significantly higher among carbapenem-resistant isolates (31%, 95% CI: 25-38%), with p < 0.001. Multivariate meta-regression analysis further confirmed that colistin resistance was significantly higher in carbapenem-resistant isolates compared to the total recovered isolates (β = 9.8% points, p = 0.001). Additionally, colistin resistance has significantly increased over time, with a β = 1.8% points per year (p = 0.001). The use of the VITEK 2 system was associated with lower detected colistin resistance compared to BMD (β = -7.0, p = 0.02). Geographically, resistance rates were higher in Upper Egypt (β = 9.3, p = 0.04). Regarding mcr plasmid-mediated resistance, mcr-1 was the most prevalent resistance gene, particularly in E. coli. In contrast, mcr-2 was rare, detected sporadically in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa.

Conclusion: In Egypt, BMD testing identified colistin resistance in 9% of Gram-negative bacteria, increasing to 31% in carbapenem-resistant isolates. This higher resistance in carbapenem-resistant strains suggests stronger selective pressure from frequent colistin use. Additionally, colistin resistance has shown a rising trend over time, likely driven by increased usage and the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance. These findings underscore the urgent need for strict antimicrobial stewardship and alternative therapies to curb resistance evolution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials considers good quality, novel and international research of more than regional relevance. Research must include epidemiological and/or clinical information about isolates, and the journal covers the clinical microbiology of bacteria, viruses and fungi, as well as antimicrobial treatment of infectious diseases. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on information concerning clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and antimicrobials. The management of infectious disease is dependent on correct diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and with this in mind, the journal aims to improve the communication between laboratory and clinical science in the field of clinical microbiology and antimicrobial treatment. Furthermore, the journal has no restrictions on space or access; this ensures that the journal can reach the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信