海马切除术对颞叶性脑膨出患者癫痫发作自由的影响:一项系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70036
Panagiota-Eleni Tsalouchidou, Alexandros Matsingos, Wiebke Hahn, Katja Menzler, Susanne Knake
{"title":"海马切除术对颞叶性脑膨出患者癫痫发作自由的影响:一项系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。","authors":"Panagiota-Eleni Tsalouchidou,&nbsp;Alexandros Matsingos,&nbsp;Wiebke Hahn,&nbsp;Katja Menzler,&nbsp;Susanne Knake","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) are increasingly recognized as a cause of MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The optimal surgical approach for TE-related refractory epilepsy remains unclear, particularly regarding the necessity of excluding mesiotemporal structures such as the hippocampus, which may lead to worse neuropsychological outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of hippocampectomy on achieving seizure freedom in patients with TE-related epilepsy through a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science, identifying studies reporting surgical outcomes in TE-related epilepsy. Studies were included if they provided at least 12 months of follow-up and reported seizure outcomes using Engel or ILAE classification. The primary outcome was postsurgical seizure freedom (Engel Class IA or ILAE Class 1). A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to compare outcomes between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The meta-analysis included 23 studies with a total of 155 surgically treated patients. The primary analysis did not identify a statistically significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.29–1.52, <i>p</i> = 0.329). Other covariates, including sex, duration of epilepsy, presence of additional epileptogenic lesions, and the use of invasive presurgical evaluation, were not significant predictors of seizure freedom. The <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic indicated moderate heterogeneity (54.68%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This IPD meta-analysis suggests that hippocompectomy does not significantly impact seizure freedom in patients with TE-related epilepsy and should not be part of a universal approach when determining the optimal surgical strategy. These results reinforce the need for an individualized approach, considering patient-specific factors to optimize surgical decision-making in TE-related epilepsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) can cause drug-resistant epilepsy, often requiring surgical management for seizure control. Given the variety of surgical techniques available, the optimal approach remains uncertain, particularly regarding the necessity of hippocampectomy, which may impact neuropsychological outcomes. This one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found no significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. These findings suggest that hippocampectomy should not be routinely performed and highlight the importance of individualized surgical decision-making for patients with TEs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"796-808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of hippocampectomy on seizure freedom in temporal encephaloceles: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Panagiota-Eleni Tsalouchidou,&nbsp;Alexandros Matsingos,&nbsp;Wiebke Hahn,&nbsp;Katja Menzler,&nbsp;Susanne Knake\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epi4.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) are increasingly recognized as a cause of MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The optimal surgical approach for TE-related refractory epilepsy remains unclear, particularly regarding the necessity of excluding mesiotemporal structures such as the hippocampus, which may lead to worse neuropsychological outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of hippocampectomy on achieving seizure freedom in patients with TE-related epilepsy through a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science, identifying studies reporting surgical outcomes in TE-related epilepsy. Studies were included if they provided at least 12 months of follow-up and reported seizure outcomes using Engel or ILAE classification. The primary outcome was postsurgical seizure freedom (Engel Class IA or ILAE Class 1). A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to compare outcomes between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The meta-analysis included 23 studies with a total of 155 surgically treated patients. The primary analysis did not identify a statistically significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.29–1.52, <i>p</i> = 0.329). Other covariates, including sex, duration of epilepsy, presence of additional epileptogenic lesions, and the use of invasive presurgical evaluation, were not significant predictors of seizure freedom. The <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic indicated moderate heterogeneity (54.68%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This IPD meta-analysis suggests that hippocompectomy does not significantly impact seizure freedom in patients with TE-related epilepsy and should not be part of a universal approach when determining the optimal surgical strategy. These results reinforce the need for an individualized approach, considering patient-specific factors to optimize surgical decision-making in TE-related epilepsy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) can cause drug-resistant epilepsy, often requiring surgical management for seizure control. Given the variety of surgical techniques available, the optimal approach remains uncertain, particularly regarding the necessity of hippocampectomy, which may impact neuropsychological outcomes. This one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found no significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. These findings suggest that hippocampectomy should not be routinely performed and highlight the importance of individualized surgical decision-making for patients with TEs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"796-808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70036\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颞叶脑泡(TEs)越来越被认为是mri阴性颞叶癫痫(TLE)的原因之一。te相关难治性癫痫的最佳手术方法尚不清楚,特别是关于排除海马等中颞叶结构的必要性,这可能导致更差的神经心理结果。本研究通过系统评价和个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,评估海马切除术对te相关癫痫患者实现癫痫发作自由的影响。方法:通过Medline、谷歌Scholar、Embase和Web of Science进行系统的文献综述,找出报道te相关癫痫手术结果的研究。如果研究提供了至少12个月的随访,并报告了使用Engel或ILAE分类的癫痫发作结果,则纳入研究。主要结局是术后癫痫发作自由(Engel IA级或ILAE 1级)。混合效应logistic回归模型用于比较接受海马切除术和未接受海马切除术的患者之间的结果。采用τ2和I2统计量评估异质性。结果:荟萃分析包括23项研究,共155例手术治疗患者。初步分析未发现接受海马切除术的患者与未接受海马切除术的患者在癫痫发作自由度方面存在统计学差异(风险比[RR] = 0.66, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.29-1.52, p = 0.329)。其他协变量,包括性别、癫痫持续时间、是否存在额外的癫痫性病变以及是否使用有创术前评估,都不是癫痫发作自由的显著预测因子。I2统计显示中度异质性(54.68%)。意义:这项IPD荟萃分析表明,海马切除术对te相关癫痫患者的癫痫发作自由度没有显著影响,在确定最佳手术策略时不应作为通用方法的一部分。这些结果加强了个体化方法的必要性,考虑患者的具体因素,以优化te相关癫痫的手术决策。简单的语言总结:颞叶脑膨出(TEs)可引起耐药癫痫,通常需要手术治疗来控制癫痫发作。考虑到各种可用的手术技术,最佳方法仍然不确定,特别是关于海马切除术的必要性,这可能会影响神经心理学结果。这项单阶段个体参与者数据荟萃分析发现,接受海马切除术和未接受海马切除术的患者在癫痫发作自由度方面没有显著差异。这些发现表明,海马切除术不应常规进行,并强调了te患者个性化手术决策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of hippocampectomy on seizure freedom in temporal encephaloceles: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Objective

Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) are increasingly recognized as a cause of MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The optimal surgical approach for TE-related refractory epilepsy remains unclear, particularly regarding the necessity of excluding mesiotemporal structures such as the hippocampus, which may lead to worse neuropsychological outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of hippocampectomy on achieving seizure freedom in patients with TE-related epilepsy through a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science, identifying studies reporting surgical outcomes in TE-related epilepsy. Studies were included if they provided at least 12 months of follow-up and reported seizure outcomes using Engel or ILAE classification. The primary outcome was postsurgical seizure freedom (Engel Class IA or ILAE Class 1). A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to compare outcomes between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. Heterogeneity was assessed using τ2 and I2 statistics.

Results

The meta-analysis included 23 studies with a total of 155 surgically treated patients. The primary analysis did not identify a statistically significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.29–1.52, p = 0.329). Other covariates, including sex, duration of epilepsy, presence of additional epileptogenic lesions, and the use of invasive presurgical evaluation, were not significant predictors of seizure freedom. The I2 statistic indicated moderate heterogeneity (54.68%).

Significance

This IPD meta-analysis suggests that hippocompectomy does not significantly impact seizure freedom in patients with TE-related epilepsy and should not be part of a universal approach when determining the optimal surgical strategy. These results reinforce the need for an individualized approach, considering patient-specific factors to optimize surgical decision-making in TE-related epilepsy.

Plain Language Summary

Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) can cause drug-resistant epilepsy, often requiring surgical management for seizure control. Given the variety of surgical techniques available, the optimal approach remains uncertain, particularly regarding the necessity of hippocampectomy, which may impact neuropsychological outcomes. This one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found no significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. These findings suggest that hippocampectomy should not be routinely performed and highlight the importance of individualized surgical decision-making for patients with TEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信