Luigi Ferrarotto, Sebastiano Immè, Claudia Tamburino, Corrado Tamburino
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术的十年研究:好与坏。","authors":"Luigi Ferrarotto, Sebastiano Immè, Claudia Tamburino, Corrado Tamburino","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming a preferred option for patients at high and moderate surgical risk and for individuals over 75 years of age. The NOTION study represents the first randomized clinical trial to reach a 10-year follow-up in patients at low surgical risk, comparing TAVI with surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The results show comparable clinical outcomes between TAVI and SAVR in terms of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction. TAVI demonstrated a better haemodynamic profile and a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), but showed higher rates of pacemaker requirement and paravalvular leakage compared with surgical replacement. The trial highlights the excellent durability of transcatheter bioprostheses, although new-generation devices and advanced techniques could further reduce adverse events. The study confirms the increasing role of TAVI even in younger patients, but further long-term data will be needed to evaluate its full potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":"27 Suppl 3","pages":"iii153-iii155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the NOTION study: the good and the bad.\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Ferrarotto, Sebastiano Immè, Claudia Tamburino, Corrado Tamburino\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming a preferred option for patients at high and moderate surgical risk and for individuals over 75 years of age. The NOTION study represents the first randomized clinical trial to reach a 10-year follow-up in patients at low surgical risk, comparing TAVI with surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The results show comparable clinical outcomes between TAVI and SAVR in terms of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction. TAVI demonstrated a better haemodynamic profile and a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), but showed higher rates of pacemaker requirement and paravalvular leakage compared with surgical replacement. The trial highlights the excellent durability of transcatheter bioprostheses, although new-generation devices and advanced techniques could further reduce adverse events. The study confirms the increasing role of TAVI even in younger patients, but further long-term data will be needed to evaluate its full potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Supplements\",\"volume\":\"27 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"iii153-iii155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ten years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the NOTION study: the good and the bad.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming a preferred option for patients at high and moderate surgical risk and for individuals over 75 years of age. The NOTION study represents the first randomized clinical trial to reach a 10-year follow-up in patients at low surgical risk, comparing TAVI with surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The results show comparable clinical outcomes between TAVI and SAVR in terms of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction. TAVI demonstrated a better haemodynamic profile and a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), but showed higher rates of pacemaker requirement and paravalvular leakage compared with surgical replacement. The trial highlights the excellent durability of transcatheter bioprostheses, although new-generation devices and advanced techniques could further reduce adverse events. The study confirms the increasing role of TAVI even in younger patients, but further long-term data will be needed to evaluate its full potential.
期刊介绍:
The European Heart Journal Supplements (EHJs) is a long standing member of the ESC Journal Family that serves as a publication medium for supplemental issues of the flagship European Heart Journal. Traditionally EHJs published a broad range of articles from symposia to special issues on specific topics of interest.
The Editor-in-Chief, Professor Roberto Ferrari, together with his team of eminent Associate Editors: Professor Francisco Fernández-Avilés, Professors Jeroen Bax, Michael Böhm, Frank Ruschitzka, and Thomas Lüscher from the European Heart Journal, has implemented a change of focus for the journal. This entirely refreshed version of the European Heart Journal Supplements now bears the subtitle the Heart of the Matter to give recognition to the focus the journal now has.
The EHJs – the Heart of the Matter intends to offer a dedicated, scientific space for the ESC, Institutions, National and Affiliate Societies, Associations, Working Groups and Councils to disseminate their important successes globally.