经导管主动脉瓣植入术的十年研究:好与坏。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European Heart Journal Supplements Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039
Luigi Ferrarotto, Sebastiano Immè, Claudia Tamburino, Corrado Tamburino
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术的十年研究:好与坏。","authors":"Luigi Ferrarotto, Sebastiano Immè, Claudia Tamburino, Corrado Tamburino","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming a preferred option for patients at high and moderate surgical risk and for individuals over 75 years of age. The NOTION study represents the first randomized clinical trial to reach a 10-year follow-up in patients at low surgical risk, comparing TAVI with surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The results show comparable clinical outcomes between TAVI and SAVR in terms of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction. TAVI demonstrated a better haemodynamic profile and a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), but showed higher rates of pacemaker requirement and paravalvular leakage compared with surgical replacement. The trial highlights the excellent durability of transcatheter bioprostheses, although new-generation devices and advanced techniques could further reduce adverse events. The study confirms the increasing role of TAVI even in younger patients, but further long-term data will be needed to evaluate its full potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":"27 Suppl 3","pages":"iii153-iii155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the NOTION study: the good and the bad.\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Ferrarotto, Sebastiano Immè, Claudia Tamburino, Corrado Tamburino\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming a preferred option for patients at high and moderate surgical risk and for individuals over 75 years of age. The NOTION study represents the first randomized clinical trial to reach a 10-year follow-up in patients at low surgical risk, comparing TAVI with surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The results show comparable clinical outcomes between TAVI and SAVR in terms of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction. TAVI demonstrated a better haemodynamic profile and a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), but showed higher rates of pacemaker requirement and paravalvular leakage compared with surgical replacement. The trial highlights the excellent durability of transcatheter bioprostheses, although new-generation devices and advanced techniques could further reduce adverse events. The study confirms the increasing role of TAVI even in younger patients, but further long-term data will be needed to evaluate its full potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Supplements\",\"volume\":\"27 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"iii153-iii155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已经改变了严重主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗方法,成为高、中度手术风险患者和75岁以上患者的首选。NOTION研究是首个对低手术风险患者进行10年随访的随机临床试验,比较TAVI和外科瓣膜置换术(SAVR)。结果显示TAVI和SAVR在全因死亡率、卒中和心肌梗死方面的临床结果相当。TAVI表现出更好的血流动力学特征和更低的结构性瓣膜恶化(SVD)发生率,但与手术替代相比,显示出更高的起搏器需求和瓣旁渗漏率。尽管新一代设备和先进技术可以进一步减少不良事件,但该试验强调了经导管生物假体的优异耐久性。该研究证实了TAVI在年轻患者中的作用越来越大,但需要进一步的长期数据来评估其全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the NOTION study: the good and the bad.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming a preferred option for patients at high and moderate surgical risk and for individuals over 75 years of age. The NOTION study represents the first randomized clinical trial to reach a 10-year follow-up in patients at low surgical risk, comparing TAVI with surgical valve replacement (SAVR). The results show comparable clinical outcomes between TAVI and SAVR in terms of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction. TAVI demonstrated a better haemodynamic profile and a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), but showed higher rates of pacemaker requirement and paravalvular leakage compared with surgical replacement. The trial highlights the excellent durability of transcatheter bioprostheses, although new-generation devices and advanced techniques could further reduce adverse events. The study confirms the increasing role of TAVI even in younger patients, but further long-term data will be needed to evaluate its full potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal Supplements
European Heart Journal Supplements 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
575
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal Supplements (EHJs) is a long standing member of the ESC Journal Family that serves as a publication medium for supplemental issues of the flagship European Heart Journal. Traditionally EHJs published a broad range of articles from symposia to special issues on specific topics of interest. The Editor-in-Chief, Professor Roberto Ferrari, together with his team of eminent Associate Editors: Professor Francisco Fernández-Avilés, Professors Jeroen Bax, Michael Böhm, Frank Ruschitzka, and Thomas Lüscher from the European Heart Journal, has implemented a change of focus for the journal. This entirely refreshed version of the European Heart Journal Supplements now bears the subtitle the Heart of the Matter to give recognition to the focus the journal now has. The EHJs – the Heart of the Matter intends to offer a dedicated, scientific space for the ESC, Institutions, National and Affiliate Societies, Associations, Working Groups and Councils to disseminate their important successes globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信