{"title":"在预测曲线中可视化标记的必要性和充分性程度。","authors":"Andreas Gleiss","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02544-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The degrees to which a factor is necessary or sufficient for an event have been proposed as generalizations of attributable risk based on simple functions of unconditional and conditional event probabilities. Predictiveness curves show the risk for an event, as derived by a model with one or more predictors, depending on risk percentiles that represent the predictors' distribution in the underlying population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Connections between the degrees of necessity and of sufficiency and explained variation on the one hand and the predictiveness curve on the other hand are mathematically proved and exemplified using data of in-hospital death of Covid- 19 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that the degrees of necessity and of sufficiency can be represented as proportions of areas easily identifiable in the plot of the predictiveness curve. In addition, we show that the proportion of explained variation, a common measure of predictiveness and relative importance of prognostic factors, is also closely connected to these areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our investigations demonstrate that the predictiveness curve extended by these new interpretations of areas provides a comprehensive evaluation of markers or sets of markers for prediction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Austrian Coronavirus Adaptive Clinical Trial (ACOVACT); ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04351724.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing a marker's degrees of necessity and of sufficiency in the predictiveness curve.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Gleiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-025-02544-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The degrees to which a factor is necessary or sufficient for an event have been proposed as generalizations of attributable risk based on simple functions of unconditional and conditional event probabilities. Predictiveness curves show the risk for an event, as derived by a model with one or more predictors, depending on risk percentiles that represent the predictors' distribution in the underlying population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Connections between the degrees of necessity and of sufficiency and explained variation on the one hand and the predictiveness curve on the other hand are mathematically proved and exemplified using data of in-hospital death of Covid- 19 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that the degrees of necessity and of sufficiency can be represented as proportions of areas easily identifiable in the plot of the predictiveness curve. In addition, we show that the proportion of explained variation, a common measure of predictiveness and relative importance of prognostic factors, is also closely connected to these areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our investigations demonstrate that the predictiveness curve extended by these new interpretations of areas provides a comprehensive evaluation of markers or sets of markers for prediction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Austrian Coronavirus Adaptive Clinical Trial (ACOVACT); ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04351724.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016328/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02544-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02544-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visualizing a marker's degrees of necessity and of sufficiency in the predictiveness curve.
Background: The degrees to which a factor is necessary or sufficient for an event have been proposed as generalizations of attributable risk based on simple functions of unconditional and conditional event probabilities. Predictiveness curves show the risk for an event, as derived by a model with one or more predictors, depending on risk percentiles that represent the predictors' distribution in the underlying population.
Methods: Connections between the degrees of necessity and of sufficiency and explained variation on the one hand and the predictiveness curve on the other hand are mathematically proved and exemplified using data of in-hospital death of Covid- 19 patients.
Results: We show that the degrees of necessity and of sufficiency can be represented as proportions of areas easily identifiable in the plot of the predictiveness curve. In addition, we show that the proportion of explained variation, a common measure of predictiveness and relative importance of prognostic factors, is also closely connected to these areas.
Conclusion: Our investigations demonstrate that the predictiveness curve extended by these new interpretations of areas provides a comprehensive evaluation of markers or sets of markers for prediction.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.