全国新生儿-围产期医学医师复苏后述职情况调查。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lily Guo, Nicole K Sather, Nadia Khan, Lauren E Zinns, Vinod Havalad, Gillian Brennan
{"title":"全国新生儿-围产期医学医师复苏后述职情况调查。","authors":"Lily Guo, Nicole K Sather, Nadia Khan, Lauren E Zinns, Vinod Havalad, Gillian Brennan","doi":"10.1055/a-2591-8200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debriefing can be a powerful tool to facilitate improvement of performance after a resuscitation event. This study characterizes the debriefing experience of neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellows in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), operating room, and delivery room in the United States.An anonymous 13-item electronic survey was distributed to NPM program directors across the United States, who were asked to forward it to their respective NPM fellows. The survey addressed the frequency and timing of debriefings, access to formal training, and comfort levels with debriefing.Ninety-five responses were collected, with all participants having taken part in at least one medical resuscitation. Debriefings occurred approximately 25% of the time following a resuscitation, typically within 6 hours. Twenty percent of respondents reported feeling somewhat or very uncomfortable leading a debriefing, while 84% believed debriefings improve team performance. Despite 72% reporting no formal debriefing training, 94% expressed interest in receiving such training.This national survey on NPM fellows highlights inconsistent debriefing practices despite recognized benefits. Limited formal training remains a barrier, but a strong interest in further education presents an opportunity to improve training through the incorporation of structured debriefing frameworks into fellowship curricula. · Although NPM fellows often debrief resuscitations, 72% reported no formal training.. · Formal debriefing training can improve debriefing quality and enhance patient outcomes.. · NPM programs should implement structured debriefing to better prepare their fellows..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Survey of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellows on Postresuscitation Debriefing.\",\"authors\":\"Lily Guo, Nicole K Sather, Nadia Khan, Lauren E Zinns, Vinod Havalad, Gillian Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2591-8200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Debriefing can be a powerful tool to facilitate improvement of performance after a resuscitation event. This study characterizes the debriefing experience of neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellows in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), operating room, and delivery room in the United States.An anonymous 13-item electronic survey was distributed to NPM program directors across the United States, who were asked to forward it to their respective NPM fellows. The survey addressed the frequency and timing of debriefings, access to formal training, and comfort levels with debriefing.Ninety-five responses were collected, with all participants having taken part in at least one medical resuscitation. Debriefings occurred approximately 25% of the time following a resuscitation, typically within 6 hours. Twenty percent of respondents reported feeling somewhat or very uncomfortable leading a debriefing, while 84% believed debriefings improve team performance. Despite 72% reporting no formal debriefing training, 94% expressed interest in receiving such training.This national survey on NPM fellows highlights inconsistent debriefing practices despite recognized benefits. Limited formal training remains a barrier, but a strong interest in further education presents an opportunity to improve training through the incorporation of structured debriefing frameworks into fellowship curricula. · Although NPM fellows often debrief resuscitations, 72% reported no formal training.. · Formal debriefing training can improve debriefing quality and enhance patient outcomes.. · NPM programs should implement structured debriefing to better prepare their fellows..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-8200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-8200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汇报是一种强有力的工具,可以促进复苏事件后的表现。本研究描述了美国新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)、手术室和产房的新生儿-围产期医学(NPM)研究员的述职经历。一份包含13个项目的匿名电子调查被分发给美国各地的NPM项目主管,他们被要求将其转发给各自的NPM研究员。调查涉及述职汇报的频率和时间、接受正式培训的机会以及对述职汇报的满意程度。收集了95份答复,所有参与者都至少参加过一次医疗复苏。复苏术后大约25%的时间会进行情况汇报,通常在6小时内。20%的受访者表示,在领导汇报时感到有些或非常不舒服,而84%的人认为汇报能提高团队绩效。尽管72%的人表示没有接受过正式的汇报培训,但94%的人表示有兴趣接受此类培训。这项关于NPM研究员的全国调查突出了尽管公认的好处,但不一致的汇报实践。有限的正式培训仍然是一个障碍,但对继续教育的强烈兴趣提供了一个机会,可以通过将有组织的汇报框架纳入研究金课程来改进培训。·尽管NPM研究员经常汇报复苏情况,但72%的人报告没有接受过正式培训。·正式的述职培训可以提高述职质量,提高患者治疗效果。·NPM项目应实施结构化的汇报,以更好地为其成员做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Survey of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellows on Postresuscitation Debriefing.

Debriefing can be a powerful tool to facilitate improvement of performance after a resuscitation event. This study characterizes the debriefing experience of neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellows in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), operating room, and delivery room in the United States.An anonymous 13-item electronic survey was distributed to NPM program directors across the United States, who were asked to forward it to their respective NPM fellows. The survey addressed the frequency and timing of debriefings, access to formal training, and comfort levels with debriefing.Ninety-five responses were collected, with all participants having taken part in at least one medical resuscitation. Debriefings occurred approximately 25% of the time following a resuscitation, typically within 6 hours. Twenty percent of respondents reported feeling somewhat or very uncomfortable leading a debriefing, while 84% believed debriefings improve team performance. Despite 72% reporting no formal debriefing training, 94% expressed interest in receiving such training.This national survey on NPM fellows highlights inconsistent debriefing practices despite recognized benefits. Limited formal training remains a barrier, but a strong interest in further education presents an opportunity to improve training through the incorporation of structured debriefing frameworks into fellowship curricula. · Although NPM fellows often debrief resuscitations, 72% reported no formal training.. · Formal debriefing training can improve debriefing quality and enhance patient outcomes.. · NPM programs should implement structured debriefing to better prepare their fellows..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信