基于形变图像配准的多组特征可靠性研究。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Owen Paetkau, Ekaterina Tchistiakova, Charles Kirkby
{"title":"基于形变图像配准的多组特征可靠性研究。","authors":"Owen Paetkau, Ekaterina Tchistiakova, Charles Kirkby","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/add73f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>. To evaluate the reliability of radiomic and dosiomic (multi-omic) features extracted from synthetic CT images generated using two commercially available deformable image registration workflows.<i>Materials and Methods</i>. Multi-omic features were extracted from organs at risk (OAR) contoured on a cohort of 58 head and neck (HN) radiotherapy patients. The contours were propagated from the planning CT to synthetic CTs of the final fraction cone-beam CT (CBCT) anatomy using MIM and Velocity deformable image registration workflows. The workflows were validated using radiation oncologist contours on the planning CT and final fraction CBCT according to TG-132 guidelines. The OAR volumes and mean dose on the synthetic CTs from two workflows were compared using a signed Wilcoxon rank test. In addition, the dose distributions were evaluated using a gamma analysis using clinical criteria. The multi-omic features were extracted using region-of-interest extraction on the OAR with the original and wavelet filters. The feature reliability was evaluated for four OAR: spinal cord, parotid glands, submandibular glands, and pharyngeal constrictors. The reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with features exceeding 0.75 considered moderately reliable.<i>Results</i>. The volume and mean OAR dose were found to be statistically similar between the MIM and Velocity synthetic CT workflows. In addition, the gamma analysis resulted in 83% of plans exceeding 95% gamma passing rate at 3%/3 mm criteria. Across all HN OAR multi-omic features, fewer radiomic features (21%) were found to be moderately reliable compared to dosiomic features (59%) between the two synthetic CT workflows. The HN OAR with the most moderately reliable features was the spinal cord (46% radiomic, 85% dosiomic).<i>Conclusion</i>. Radiomics features presented worse reliability compared to dosiomic features across different synthetic CT deformable image registration workflows. Care should be taken when implementing predictive models using features extracted from different synthetic CT workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-omic feature reliability of deformable image registration-based images.\",\"authors\":\"Owen Paetkau, Ekaterina Tchistiakova, Charles Kirkby\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/add73f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>. To evaluate the reliability of radiomic and dosiomic (multi-omic) features extracted from synthetic CT images generated using two commercially available deformable image registration workflows.<i>Materials and Methods</i>. Multi-omic features were extracted from organs at risk (OAR) contoured on a cohort of 58 head and neck (HN) radiotherapy patients. The contours were propagated from the planning CT to synthetic CTs of the final fraction cone-beam CT (CBCT) anatomy using MIM and Velocity deformable image registration workflows. The workflows were validated using radiation oncologist contours on the planning CT and final fraction CBCT according to TG-132 guidelines. The OAR volumes and mean dose on the synthetic CTs from two workflows were compared using a signed Wilcoxon rank test. In addition, the dose distributions were evaluated using a gamma analysis using clinical criteria. The multi-omic features were extracted using region-of-interest extraction on the OAR with the original and wavelet filters. The feature reliability was evaluated for four OAR: spinal cord, parotid glands, submandibular glands, and pharyngeal constrictors. The reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with features exceeding 0.75 considered moderately reliable.<i>Results</i>. The volume and mean OAR dose were found to be statistically similar between the MIM and Velocity synthetic CT workflows. In addition, the gamma analysis resulted in 83% of plans exceeding 95% gamma passing rate at 3%/3 mm criteria. Across all HN OAR multi-omic features, fewer radiomic features (21%) were found to be moderately reliable compared to dosiomic features (59%) between the two synthetic CT workflows. The HN OAR with the most moderately reliable features was the spinal cord (46% radiomic, 85% dosiomic).<i>Conclusion</i>. Radiomics features presented worse reliability compared to dosiomic features across different synthetic CT deformable image registration workflows. Care should be taken when implementing predictive models using features extracted from different synthetic CT workflows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add73f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add73f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估从两种商用可变形图像配准工作流生成的合成CT图像中提取放射组和剂量组(多组)特征的可靠性。材料和方法:从58例头颈部(HN)放疗患者的危险器官(OAR)轮廓中提取多组特征。使用MIM和Velocity可变形图像配准工作流将轮廓从规划CT传播到最终分数锥束CT (CBCT)解剖的合成CT。根据TG-132指南,使用放射肿瘤学家在计划CT和最终分数CBCT上的轮廓来验证工作流程。使用有符号的Wilcoxon秩检验比较两个工作流程合成ct的桨叶体积和平均剂量。此外,根据临床标准使用伽玛分析评估剂量分布。 ;利用原始滤波器和小波滤波器对桨叶进行兴趣区域提取,提取多组特征。对脊髓、腮腺、下颌下腺和咽缩肌这四种OAR进行特征可靠性评估。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性,其特征超过0.75视为中等可靠。 ;结果:发现MIM和Velocity合成CT工作流程之间的体积和平均OAR剂量在统计学上相似。此外,伽马分析结果表明,在3%/3mm标准下,83%的方案的伽马通过率超过95%。在所有的HN OAR多组学特征中,与两种合成CT工作流程中的剂量学特征(59%)相比,较少的放射学特征(21%)被认为是中等可靠的。具有最中等可靠性特征的HN OAR是脊髓(46%放射组学,85%剂量组学)。结论:在不同的合成CT可变形图像配准工作流程中,放射组学特征与剂量组学特征相比,可靠性较差。在使用从不同合成CT工作流程中提取的特征实现预测模型时,应小心。 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-omic feature reliability of deformable image registration-based images.

Purpose. To evaluate the reliability of radiomic and dosiomic (multi-omic) features extracted from synthetic CT images generated using two commercially available deformable image registration workflows.Materials and Methods. Multi-omic features were extracted from organs at risk (OAR) contoured on a cohort of 58 head and neck (HN) radiotherapy patients. The contours were propagated from the planning CT to synthetic CTs of the final fraction cone-beam CT (CBCT) anatomy using MIM and Velocity deformable image registration workflows. The workflows were validated using radiation oncologist contours on the planning CT and final fraction CBCT according to TG-132 guidelines. The OAR volumes and mean dose on the synthetic CTs from two workflows were compared using a signed Wilcoxon rank test. In addition, the dose distributions were evaluated using a gamma analysis using clinical criteria. The multi-omic features were extracted using region-of-interest extraction on the OAR with the original and wavelet filters. The feature reliability was evaluated for four OAR: spinal cord, parotid glands, submandibular glands, and pharyngeal constrictors. The reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with features exceeding 0.75 considered moderately reliable.Results. The volume and mean OAR dose were found to be statistically similar between the MIM and Velocity synthetic CT workflows. In addition, the gamma analysis resulted in 83% of plans exceeding 95% gamma passing rate at 3%/3 mm criteria. Across all HN OAR multi-omic features, fewer radiomic features (21%) were found to be moderately reliable compared to dosiomic features (59%) between the two synthetic CT workflows. The HN OAR with the most moderately reliable features was the spinal cord (46% radiomic, 85% dosiomic).Conclusion. Radiomics features presented worse reliability compared to dosiomic features across different synthetic CT deformable image registration workflows. Care should be taken when implementing predictive models using features extracted from different synthetic CT workflows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信