全髋关节置换术与非手术对患者报告的3个月髋关节功能的有效性:骨关节炎患者的目标试验模拟研究

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Amanda D Klaassen, Wiard Jorritsma, Nienke W Willigenburg, Carina L E Gerritsma, Bas L E F Ten Have, Dirk Jan F Moojen, Maaike G J Gademan, Rolf H H Groenwold, Rudolf W Poolman
{"title":"全髋关节置换术与非手术对患者报告的3个月髋关节功能的有效性:骨关节炎患者的目标试验模拟研究","authors":"Amanda D Klaassen, Wiard Jorritsma, Nienke W Willigenburg, Carina L E Gerritsma, Bas L E F Ten Have, Dirk Jan F Moojen, Maaike G J Gademan, Rolf H H Groenwold, Rudolf W Poolman","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> This study introduces an innovative research design in the field of orthopedics, using a target trial emulation approach. We aimed to assess the causal effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with nonoperative treatment in reducing patient-reported hip disability at 3 months in patients with osteoarthritis, using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We emulated a target trial using real-world data of 2 Dutch hospitals between April 2020 and January 2022. Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis and eligible for primary THA were included in the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, THA was often cancelled due to external factors (i.e., limited operating room capacity, or surgeon unavailable due to quarantine rules), resulting in an arbitrary allocation of patients to THA (n = 132) or non-THA (n = 60). We compared changes in hip disability, measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short form (HOOS-PS), between the THA group at 3 months postoperatively and the non-THA group at ≥3 months post waiting-list. Linear regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, was used to compare between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> THA showed preferable outcomes compared with non-THA, indicated by a difference of -33 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -37 to -28) on the HOOS-PS. Patients in the THA group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in hip function, with a mean change of -27 points (CI -31 to -24), while the control group showed no improvement with a mean change of 7 points (CI 3-11) on the HOOS-PS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> THA significantly improves hip function in osteoarthritis patients, surpassing the outcomes observed in the non-surgery group.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"310-316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus non-surgery on patient-reported hip function at 3 months: a target trial emulation study of patients with osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda D Klaassen, Wiard Jorritsma, Nienke W Willigenburg, Carina L E Gerritsma, Bas L E F Ten Have, Dirk Jan F Moojen, Maaike G J Gademan, Rolf H H Groenwold, Rudolf W Poolman\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.43332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> This study introduces an innovative research design in the field of orthopedics, using a target trial emulation approach. We aimed to assess the causal effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with nonoperative treatment in reducing patient-reported hip disability at 3 months in patients with osteoarthritis, using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We emulated a target trial using real-world data of 2 Dutch hospitals between April 2020 and January 2022. Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis and eligible for primary THA were included in the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, THA was often cancelled due to external factors (i.e., limited operating room capacity, or surgeon unavailable due to quarantine rules), resulting in an arbitrary allocation of patients to THA (n = 132) or non-THA (n = 60). We compared changes in hip disability, measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short form (HOOS-PS), between the THA group at 3 months postoperatively and the non-THA group at ≥3 months post waiting-list. Linear regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, was used to compare between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> THA showed preferable outcomes compared with non-THA, indicated by a difference of -33 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -37 to -28) on the HOOS-PS. Patients in the THA group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in hip function, with a mean change of -27 points (CI -31 to -24), while the control group showed no improvement with a mean change of 7 points (CI 3-11) on the HOOS-PS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> THA significantly improves hip function in osteoarthritis patients, surpassing the outcomes observed in the non-surgery group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"310-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995426/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43332\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究采用目标试验仿真方法,在骨科领域提出了一种创新的研究设计。我们的目的是评估全髋关节置换术(THA)与非手术治疗在减少骨关节炎患者报告的3个月髋关节残疾方面的因果效应,使用真实世界的数据。方法:我们使用2020年4月至2022年1月期间两家荷兰医院的真实数据模拟了一项目标试验。诊断为髋关节骨关节炎并符合原发性全髋关节置换术条件的患者纳入研究。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,由于外部因素(如手术室容量有限,或因隔离规定而无法安排外科医生),THA经常被取消,导致患者被任意分配到THA (n = 132)或非THA (n = 60)。我们比较了髋关节失能的变化,采用髋关节失能和骨关节炎结局评分物理功能简表(HOOS-PS)测量,THA组在术后3个月和非THA组在等待名单后≥3个月。采用线性回归分析,调整潜在混杂因素,比较组间差异。结果:与非THA相比,THA表现出更好的结果,HOOS-PS差异为-33点(95%置信区间[CI] -37至-28)。THA组患者髋关节功能有临床显著改善,平均变化-27点(CI -31至-24),而对照组无改善,hos - ps平均变化7点(CI 3-11)。结论:THA能显著改善骨关节炎患者的髋关节功能,优于非手术组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus non-surgery on patient-reported hip function at 3 months: a target trial emulation study of patients with osteoarthritis.

Background and purpose:  This study introduces an innovative research design in the field of orthopedics, using a target trial emulation approach. We aimed to assess the causal effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with nonoperative treatment in reducing patient-reported hip disability at 3 months in patients with osteoarthritis, using real-world data.

Methods:  We emulated a target trial using real-world data of 2 Dutch hospitals between April 2020 and January 2022. Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis and eligible for primary THA were included in the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, THA was often cancelled due to external factors (i.e., limited operating room capacity, or surgeon unavailable due to quarantine rules), resulting in an arbitrary allocation of patients to THA (n = 132) or non-THA (n = 60). We compared changes in hip disability, measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short form (HOOS-PS), between the THA group at 3 months postoperatively and the non-THA group at ≥3 months post waiting-list. Linear regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, was used to compare between-group differences.

Results:  THA showed preferable outcomes compared with non-THA, indicated by a difference of -33 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -37 to -28) on the HOOS-PS. Patients in the THA group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in hip function, with a mean change of -27 points (CI -31 to -24), while the control group showed no improvement with a mean change of 7 points (CI 3-11) on the HOOS-PS.

Conclusion:  THA significantly improves hip function in osteoarthritis patients, surpassing the outcomes observed in the non-surgery group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信