Jonathan Ackroyd, Sarika S Deodhar, Subramanian Loganathan, Gursharan Singh, Ashwani Marwah, Kuldeep Kumar, Jayanti Panda, Sandeep Nilkanth Athalye
{"title":"Biocon的ustekinumab (Bmab-1200)与欧盟批准和美国许可的参考ustekinumab在健康受试者中的药代动力学等效性和比较安全性、耐受性和免疫原性:来自生物类似药ustekinumab与SteLARa (stelar -1)的药代动力学等效性研究的结果。","authors":"Jonathan Ackroyd, Sarika S Deodhar, Subramanian Loganathan, Gursharan Singh, Ashwani Marwah, Kuldeep Kumar, Jayanti Panda, Sandeep Nilkanth Athalye","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2025.2500334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) equivalence, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of Bmab-1200 versus the reference product ustekinumab (EU-approved and US-licensed Stelara).</p><p><strong>Research design & methods: </strong>This 20-week, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-design, Phase-1 study enrolled healthy male and female subjects (<i>n</i> = 258; 18-55 years). A single, 45-mg subcutaneous injection of Bmab-1200, EU-approved Stelara, or US-licensed Stelara was administered in a 1:1:1 ratio. Subject stratification was performed by ethnicity, body weight range, and gender. Primary PK endpoints included AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>. Secondary endpoints included additional PK parameters, immunogenicity, and safety and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three pairwise comparisons of Bmab-1200 versus US-Stelara, Bmab-1200 versus EU-Stelara, and US-Stelara versus EU-Stelara were equivalent for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> (90% confidence intervals [CIs] of the geometric least squares mean [GLSM] ratio: 0.9975-1.1657, 0.9959-1.1685, and 0.9223-1.0921, respectively) and C<sub>max</sub> (90% CIs of the GLSM ratio: 0.9478-1.0732, 0.9136-1.0376, and 0.9012-1.0267, respectively). All secondary analyses supported the primary results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-way PK equivalence between Bmab-1200, US-Stelara, and EU-Stelara was demonstrated. A single, 45-mg dose of Bmab-1200 was safe and well tolerated, and, overall, the number of AEs was similar among the groups. Diversity limited to White and Japanese groups did not impact the study results.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with www.isrctn.com; identifier: ISRCTN11424009.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":"34 4","pages":"349-357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic equivalence and comparative safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of Biocon's ustekinumab (Bmab-1200) with EU-approved and US-licensed reference ustekinumab in healthy subjects: results from the Study to Test pharmacokinetic BioEquivalence of BiosimiLar ustekinumab to SteLARa (STELLAR-1).\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Ackroyd, Sarika S Deodhar, Subramanian Loganathan, Gursharan Singh, Ashwani Marwah, Kuldeep Kumar, Jayanti Panda, Sandeep Nilkanth Athalye\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13543784.2025.2500334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) equivalence, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of Bmab-1200 versus the reference product ustekinumab (EU-approved and US-licensed Stelara).</p><p><strong>Research design & methods: </strong>This 20-week, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-design, Phase-1 study enrolled healthy male and female subjects (<i>n</i> = 258; 18-55 years). A single, 45-mg subcutaneous injection of Bmab-1200, EU-approved Stelara, or US-licensed Stelara was administered in a 1:1:1 ratio. Subject stratification was performed by ethnicity, body weight range, and gender. Primary PK endpoints included AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>. Secondary endpoints included additional PK parameters, immunogenicity, and safety and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three pairwise comparisons of Bmab-1200 versus US-Stelara, Bmab-1200 versus EU-Stelara, and US-Stelara versus EU-Stelara were equivalent for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> (90% confidence intervals [CIs] of the geometric least squares mean [GLSM] ratio: 0.9975-1.1657, 0.9959-1.1685, and 0.9223-1.0921, respectively) and C<sub>max</sub> (90% CIs of the GLSM ratio: 0.9478-1.0732, 0.9136-1.0376, and 0.9012-1.0267, respectively). All secondary analyses supported the primary results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-way PK equivalence between Bmab-1200, US-Stelara, and EU-Stelara was demonstrated. A single, 45-mg dose of Bmab-1200 was safe and well tolerated, and, overall, the number of AEs was similar among the groups. Diversity limited to White and Japanese groups did not impact the study results.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with www.isrctn.com; identifier: ISRCTN11424009.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert opinion on investigational drugs\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"349-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert opinion on investigational drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2025.2500334\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2025.2500334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacokinetic equivalence and comparative safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of Biocon's ustekinumab (Bmab-1200) with EU-approved and US-licensed reference ustekinumab in healthy subjects: results from the Study to Test pharmacokinetic BioEquivalence of BiosimiLar ustekinumab to SteLARa (STELLAR-1).
Background: This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) equivalence, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of Bmab-1200 versus the reference product ustekinumab (EU-approved and US-licensed Stelara).
Research design & methods: This 20-week, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-design, Phase-1 study enrolled healthy male and female subjects (n = 258; 18-55 years). A single, 45-mg subcutaneous injection of Bmab-1200, EU-approved Stelara, or US-licensed Stelara was administered in a 1:1:1 ratio. Subject stratification was performed by ethnicity, body weight range, and gender. Primary PK endpoints included AUC0-inf and Cmax. Secondary endpoints included additional PK parameters, immunogenicity, and safety and tolerability.
Results: All three pairwise comparisons of Bmab-1200 versus US-Stelara, Bmab-1200 versus EU-Stelara, and US-Stelara versus EU-Stelara were equivalent for AUC0-inf (90% confidence intervals [CIs] of the geometric least squares mean [GLSM] ratio: 0.9975-1.1657, 0.9959-1.1685, and 0.9223-1.0921, respectively) and Cmax (90% CIs of the GLSM ratio: 0.9478-1.0732, 0.9136-1.0376, and 0.9012-1.0267, respectively). All secondary analyses supported the primary results.
Conclusion: Three-way PK equivalence between Bmab-1200, US-Stelara, and EU-Stelara was demonstrated. A single, 45-mg dose of Bmab-1200 was safe and well tolerated, and, overall, the number of AEs was similar among the groups. Diversity limited to White and Japanese groups did not impact the study results.
Clinical trial registration: This study was registered with www.isrctn.com; identifier: ISRCTN11424009.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
The Editors welcome:
Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies
Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug
Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials
The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.