颅面创伤的内部3D打印:7年回顾。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kevin Chen, Caroline C Kreh, Alexander Y Lin
{"title":"颅面创伤的内部3D打印:7年回顾。","authors":"Kevin Chen, Caroline C Kreh, Alexander Y Lin","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex facial trauma presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as the loss of facial buttresses makes accurate reduction of fractures more and more difficult. Accurate 3D-printed models and virtual surgical planning have become a mainstay in many other aspects of craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, turnaround times from industry produced models frequently preclude their use in the unplanned acute surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We seek to evaluate the use of in-house printed 3D models for facial trauma and the efficacy and safety of the procedures performed with the aid of these models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients from January 2017 to August 2023 who received an in-house 3D-printed model to help treat facial fractures were analyzed. Chart review was performed to extract demographic data, fracture type, mechanism, complications, comorbidities, and operative time. Analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients had 3D models created for facial fractures. The average age was 24.5 years. Motorized vehicles were involved in 15 cases (62.5%). The most commonly injured region was the midface (19 patients; 79.2%), and 8 patients had true panfacial fractures (33.3%). Seventeen patients (71%) had complex fractures involving multiple buttresses. For acute treatments, average time from presentation to operative treatment was 9 days. Average operative time was 268.3 minutes. Three patients (12.5%) had minor complications, including localized infection treated with antibiotics and a small wound dehiscence. Two patients (6.25%) had major complications: a draining sinus tract that required excision and a cicatricial lagophthalmos due to a laceration near the eyelid margin. Ninety-six percent of patients had satisfactory facial contour.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D printing anatomical models can be helpful in assisting surgical decision making for patients with facial fractures as well as the process of surgery itself by allowing for prebending of plates. In the acute setting, when turnaround times are short, in-house 3D printing can produce models in a timely fashion to help surgeons operate safely and efficaciously.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 5S Suppl 3","pages":"S435-S440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-House 3D Printing for Craniofacial Trauma: 7-Year Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Chen, Caroline C Kreh, Alexander Y Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex facial trauma presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as the loss of facial buttresses makes accurate reduction of fractures more and more difficult. Accurate 3D-printed models and virtual surgical planning have become a mainstay in many other aspects of craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, turnaround times from industry produced models frequently preclude their use in the unplanned acute surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We seek to evaluate the use of in-house printed 3D models for facial trauma and the efficacy and safety of the procedures performed with the aid of these models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients from January 2017 to August 2023 who received an in-house 3D-printed model to help treat facial fractures were analyzed. Chart review was performed to extract demographic data, fracture type, mechanism, complications, comorbidities, and operative time. Analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients had 3D models created for facial fractures. The average age was 24.5 years. Motorized vehicles were involved in 15 cases (62.5%). The most commonly injured region was the midface (19 patients; 79.2%), and 8 patients had true panfacial fractures (33.3%). Seventeen patients (71%) had complex fractures involving multiple buttresses. For acute treatments, average time from presentation to operative treatment was 9 days. Average operative time was 268.3 minutes. Three patients (12.5%) had minor complications, including localized infection treated with antibiotics and a small wound dehiscence. Two patients (6.25%) had major complications: a draining sinus tract that required excision and a cicatricial lagophthalmos due to a laceration near the eyelid margin. Ninety-six percent of patients had satisfactory facial contour.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D printing anatomical models can be helpful in assisting surgical decision making for patients with facial fractures as well as the process of surgery itself by allowing for prebending of plates. In the acute setting, when turnaround times are short, in-house 3D printing can produce models in a timely fashion to help surgeons operate safely and efficaciously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 5S Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S435-S440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复杂的面部创伤对重建外科医生来说是一个挑战,因为面部支撑的丧失使得骨折的准确复位越来越困难。精确的3d打印模型和虚拟手术计划已经成为颅颌面外科许多其他方面的支柱。然而,周转时间从工业生产的模型经常排除他们在非计划的急性手术设置使用。目的:我们试图评估内部打印3D模型在面部创伤中的使用,以及在这些模型的帮助下进行手术的有效性和安全性。方法:分析2017年1月至2023年8月,所有接受内部3d打印模型帮助治疗面部骨折的患者。进行图表回顾,以提取人口统计学数据、骨折类型、机制、并发症、合并症和手术时间。在Microsoft Excel中进行分析。结果:共建立了24例面部骨折的三维模型。平均年龄为24.5岁。机动车涉及15起(62.5%)。最常见的损伤部位为面部中部(19例;真全面骨折8例(33.3%)。17例患者(71%)有累及多个扶壁的复杂骨折。对于急性治疗,从出现到手术治疗平均时间为9天。平均手术时间268.3分钟。3例患者(12.5%)有轻微并发症,包括局部感染,用抗生素治疗和小伤口裂开。2例患者(6.25%)有主要并发症:需要切除的窦道引流和眼睑边缘附近撕裂引起的瘢痕性眼lagmos。96%的患者面部轮廓满意。结论:3D打印解剖模型允许钢板预弯曲,有助于面部骨折患者的手术决策以及手术过程本身。在紧急情况下,当周转时间很短时,内部3D打印可以及时生成模型,帮助外科医生安全有效地操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-House 3D Printing for Craniofacial Trauma: 7-Year Review.

Introduction: Complex facial trauma presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as the loss of facial buttresses makes accurate reduction of fractures more and more difficult. Accurate 3D-printed models and virtual surgical planning have become a mainstay in many other aspects of craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, turnaround times from industry produced models frequently preclude their use in the unplanned acute surgical setting.

Purpose: We seek to evaluate the use of in-house printed 3D models for facial trauma and the efficacy and safety of the procedures performed with the aid of these models.

Methods: All patients from January 2017 to August 2023 who received an in-house 3D-printed model to help treat facial fractures were analyzed. Chart review was performed to extract demographic data, fracture type, mechanism, complications, comorbidities, and operative time. Analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel.

Results: A total of 24 patients had 3D models created for facial fractures. The average age was 24.5 years. Motorized vehicles were involved in 15 cases (62.5%). The most commonly injured region was the midface (19 patients; 79.2%), and 8 patients had true panfacial fractures (33.3%). Seventeen patients (71%) had complex fractures involving multiple buttresses. For acute treatments, average time from presentation to operative treatment was 9 days. Average operative time was 268.3 minutes. Three patients (12.5%) had minor complications, including localized infection treated with antibiotics and a small wound dehiscence. Two patients (6.25%) had major complications: a draining sinus tract that required excision and a cicatricial lagophthalmos due to a laceration near the eyelid margin. Ninety-six percent of patients had satisfactory facial contour.

Conclusions: 3D printing anatomical models can be helpful in assisting surgical decision making for patients with facial fractures as well as the process of surgery itself by allowing for prebending of plates. In the acute setting, when turnaround times are short, in-house 3D printing can produce models in a timely fashion to help surgeons operate safely and efficaciously.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信