{"title":"改良图像受体保持装置在咬翼造影中减少近端表面重叠的临床应用。","authors":"Lara Ravanelli, Michelle Chang, Henrique Mateus Alves Felizardo, Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To clinically validate the use of a modified image receptor-holding device (IRHD) for the bitewing technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Premolars and molars' bitewing radiographs of 101 patients were acquired using two IRHD (traditional and modified). The modified IRHD was computer-aided designed and 3D printed. Images were acquired by a single operator using a digital radiographic system with phosphor storage plates. A questionnaire regarding the perception of the use of the two IRHD was applied to patients and the operator. Image evaluation (paired and individual) was performed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Repetition, overlap rate and operator/patient perception were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies, and compared between the devices using the chi-square test with a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired evaluation showed no difference in the rate of proximal surface overlap between the IRHDs (p ≥ 0.05). Individual evaluation showed a lower rate of proximal surface overlap with the modified IRHD, with emphasis on the distal surface in the premolar region (p < 0.05). The modified IRHD presented greater ease of positioning (52.3%), greater stability (64.9%), preference of use by the operator (54.5%) and greater comfort was reported by the patients (54.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified IRHD may be more comfortable and has the potential to reduce the proximal surface overlap than the traditional IRHD, especially when there is an indication for a single radiograph in the premolar region.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>We clinically validated a modified IRHD that has potential to decrease proximal surfaces overlap with greater comfort for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of a modified image receptor-holding device to reduce proximal surfaces overlapping in bitewing radiography.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Ravanelli, Michelle Chang, Henrique Mateus Alves Felizardo, Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twaf043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To clinically validate the use of a modified image receptor-holding device (IRHD) for the bitewing technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Premolars and molars' bitewing radiographs of 101 patients were acquired using two IRHD (traditional and modified). The modified IRHD was computer-aided designed and 3D printed. Images were acquired by a single operator using a digital radiographic system with phosphor storage plates. A questionnaire regarding the perception of the use of the two IRHD was applied to patients and the operator. Image evaluation (paired and individual) was performed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Repetition, overlap rate and operator/patient perception were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies, and compared between the devices using the chi-square test with a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired evaluation showed no difference in the rate of proximal surface overlap between the IRHDs (p ≥ 0.05). Individual evaluation showed a lower rate of proximal surface overlap with the modified IRHD, with emphasis on the distal surface in the premolar region (p < 0.05). The modified IRHD presented greater ease of positioning (52.3%), greater stability (64.9%), preference of use by the operator (54.5%) and greater comfort was reported by the patients (54.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified IRHD may be more comfortable and has the potential to reduce the proximal surface overlap than the traditional IRHD, especially when there is an indication for a single radiograph in the premolar region.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>We clinically validated a modified IRHD that has potential to decrease proximal surfaces overlap with greater comfort for the patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical application of a modified image receptor-holding device to reduce proximal surfaces overlapping in bitewing radiography.
Objectives: To clinically validate the use of a modified image receptor-holding device (IRHD) for the bitewing technique.
Methods: Premolars and molars' bitewing radiographs of 101 patients were acquired using two IRHD (traditional and modified). The modified IRHD was computer-aided designed and 3D printed. Images were acquired by a single operator using a digital radiographic system with phosphor storage plates. A questionnaire regarding the perception of the use of the two IRHD was applied to patients and the operator. Image evaluation (paired and individual) was performed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Repetition, overlap rate and operator/patient perception were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies, and compared between the devices using the chi-square test with a 5% significance level.
Results: The paired evaluation showed no difference in the rate of proximal surface overlap between the IRHDs (p ≥ 0.05). Individual evaluation showed a lower rate of proximal surface overlap with the modified IRHD, with emphasis on the distal surface in the premolar region (p < 0.05). The modified IRHD presented greater ease of positioning (52.3%), greater stability (64.9%), preference of use by the operator (54.5%) and greater comfort was reported by the patients (54.5%).
Conclusions: The modified IRHD may be more comfortable and has the potential to reduce the proximal surface overlap than the traditional IRHD, especially when there is an indication for a single radiograph in the premolar region.
Advances in knowledge: We clinically validated a modified IRHD that has potential to decrease proximal surfaces overlap with greater comfort for the patients.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X