比较非活力新生儿脐带管理策略:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mohamed A Aldemerdash, Mohammed Abdellatif, Doha Refaey, Yaser AbuSammour, Mahmoud Refaey, Abdelrhman Muwafaq Janem, Mohammed Tarek Hasan, Ahmed Aldemerdash, Huda Shihab, Naema Hamouda
{"title":"比较非活力新生儿脐带管理策略:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohamed A Aldemerdash, Mohammed Abdellatif, Doha Refaey, Yaser AbuSammour, Mahmoud Refaey, Abdelrhman Muwafaq Janem, Mohammed Tarek Hasan, Ahmed Aldemerdash, Huda Shihab, Naema Hamouda","doi":"10.1055/a-2598-7291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonvigorous newborns often require immediate resuscitation, and early cord clamping (ECC) is the conventional approach. Alternative strategies, such as intact cord resuscitation (ICR) and umbilical cord milking (UCM), may provide additional benefits without compromising safety. To compare the effectiveness and safety of different umbilical cord management strategies for nonvigorous newborns.We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and searched six databases for randomized controlled trials comparing different umbilical cord management approaches in nonvigorous newborns. Outcomes assessed included resuscitation effectiveness, hematological parameters, neonatal morbidities, and mortality. The Cochrane Collaboration tool RoB2 was used to assess the risk of bias.Ten studies with 2,541 newborns were included, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed in resuscitation requirements, Apgar scores, or mortality between ECC, ICR, and UCM. However, at 5 minutes, ICR showed a small but statistically significant higher Apgar score compared with other interventions (mean difference [MD] = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.05, 0.55]). Additionally, heart rate was lower in the intact ICM (I-UCM) group (MD = -34.75 beats/min, 95% CI [-61.84, -7.66]). Cut UCM was associated with significantly higher serum ferritin levels at 6 weeks (MD = 40.44 µg/L, 95% CI [26.45, 54.43]). Initial hematocrit levels were also higher in the ICR group compared with ECC.ICR and UCM might be safe and effective alternatives to ECC for nonvigorous newborns, with potential hematological benefits. However, further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. · ICR and UCM might be safe and effective alternatives to ECC for nonvigorous newborns.. · Heart rate was lower in the I-UCM group.. · ICR showed statistically significant higher Apgar.. · Cut UCM was associated with significantly higher serum ferritin levels at 6 weeks..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Umbilical Cord Management Strategies in Nonvigorous Newborns: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed A Aldemerdash, Mohammed Abdellatif, Doha Refaey, Yaser AbuSammour, Mahmoud Refaey, Abdelrhman Muwafaq Janem, Mohammed Tarek Hasan, Ahmed Aldemerdash, Huda Shihab, Naema Hamouda\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2598-7291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nonvigorous newborns often require immediate resuscitation, and early cord clamping (ECC) is the conventional approach. Alternative strategies, such as intact cord resuscitation (ICR) and umbilical cord milking (UCM), may provide additional benefits without compromising safety. To compare the effectiveness and safety of different umbilical cord management strategies for nonvigorous newborns.We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and searched six databases for randomized controlled trials comparing different umbilical cord management approaches in nonvigorous newborns. Outcomes assessed included resuscitation effectiveness, hematological parameters, neonatal morbidities, and mortality. The Cochrane Collaboration tool RoB2 was used to assess the risk of bias.Ten studies with 2,541 newborns were included, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed in resuscitation requirements, Apgar scores, or mortality between ECC, ICR, and UCM. However, at 5 minutes, ICR showed a small but statistically significant higher Apgar score compared with other interventions (mean difference [MD] = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.05, 0.55]). Additionally, heart rate was lower in the intact ICM (I-UCM) group (MD = -34.75 beats/min, 95% CI [-61.84, -7.66]). Cut UCM was associated with significantly higher serum ferritin levels at 6 weeks (MD = 40.44 µg/L, 95% CI [26.45, 54.43]). Initial hematocrit levels were also higher in the ICR group compared with ECC.ICR and UCM might be safe and effective alternatives to ECC for nonvigorous newborns, with potential hematological benefits. However, further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. · ICR and UCM might be safe and effective alternatives to ECC for nonvigorous newborns.. · Heart rate was lower in the I-UCM group.. · ICR showed statistically significant higher Apgar.. · Cut UCM was associated with significantly higher serum ferritin levels at 6 weeks..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2598-7291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2598-7291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无活力的新生儿往往需要立即复苏,早期脐带夹紧(ECC)是传统的方法。替代策略,如完整脐带复苏(ICR)和脐带挤奶(UCM),可能在不影响安全性的情况下提供额外的好处。目的:比较不同脐带管理策略对非活力新生儿的有效性和安全性。方法:我们遵循PRISMA指南,检索了6个数据库进行随机对照试验,比较不同的脐带管理方法对非活力新生儿的影响。评估的结果包括复苏效果、血液学参数、新生儿发病率和死亡率。使用Cochrane协作工具RoB2评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入了10项涉及2541名新生儿的研究,其中7项研究对meta分析有贡献。早期脐带夹紧(ECC)、完整脐带复苏(ICR)和脐带挤奶(UCM)在复苏需求、APGAR评分或死亡率方面均无显著差异。然而,在5分钟时,ICR与其他干预措施相比,APGAR评分虽小但有统计学意义(MD = 0.3,95% CI[0.05, 0.55])。此外,完整脐带挤奶(I-UCM)组的心率更低(MD = -34.75次/分钟,95% CI[-61.84, -7.66])。切割UCM与6周时血清铁蛋白水平显著升高相关(MD = 40.44µg/L, 95% CI[26.45, 54.43])。与ECC相比,ICR组的初始血细胞比容水平也更高。结论:ICR和UCM可能是非活力新生儿ECC的安全有效的替代方案,具有潜在的血液学益处。然而,需要进一步的大规模研究来证实这些发现并评估长期的神经发育结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Umbilical Cord Management Strategies in Nonvigorous Newborns: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Nonvigorous newborns often require immediate resuscitation, and early cord clamping (ECC) is the conventional approach. Alternative strategies, such as intact cord resuscitation (ICR) and umbilical cord milking (UCM), may provide additional benefits without compromising safety. To compare the effectiveness and safety of different umbilical cord management strategies for nonvigorous newborns.We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and searched six databases for randomized controlled trials comparing different umbilical cord management approaches in nonvigorous newborns. Outcomes assessed included resuscitation effectiveness, hematological parameters, neonatal morbidities, and mortality. The Cochrane Collaboration tool RoB2 was used to assess the risk of bias.Ten studies with 2,541 newborns were included, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed in resuscitation requirements, Apgar scores, or mortality between ECC, ICR, and UCM. However, at 5 minutes, ICR showed a small but statistically significant higher Apgar score compared with other interventions (mean difference [MD] = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.05, 0.55]). Additionally, heart rate was lower in the intact ICM (I-UCM) group (MD = -34.75 beats/min, 95% CI [-61.84, -7.66]). Cut UCM was associated with significantly higher serum ferritin levels at 6 weeks (MD = 40.44 µg/L, 95% CI [26.45, 54.43]). Initial hematocrit levels were also higher in the ICR group compared with ECC.ICR and UCM might be safe and effective alternatives to ECC for nonvigorous newborns, with potential hematological benefits. However, further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. · ICR and UCM might be safe and effective alternatives to ECC for nonvigorous newborns.. · Heart rate was lower in the I-UCM group.. · ICR showed statistically significant higher Apgar.. · Cut UCM was associated with significantly higher serum ferritin levels at 6 weeks..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信