剖宫产术中剖宫产延长的分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jason G Bunn, Albert Tang, Kristen Warncke, Saron Gilazgi, Donald D Mcintire, David B Nelson, Catherine Y Spong, J Seth Hawkins
{"title":"剖宫产术中剖宫产延长的分析。","authors":"Jason G Bunn, Albert Tang, Kristen Warncke, Saron Gilazgi, Donald D Mcintire, David B Nelson, Catherine Y Spong, J Seth Hawkins","doi":"10.1055/a-2586-3568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine if the rate of hysterotomy extensions increases with increasing cervical dilation in unscheduled cesarean deliveries, and to develop a measure of the severity of hysterotomy extension for quantifying morbidity.This is a retrospective study of unscheduled cesarean deliveries relating to labor dystocia and/or nonreassuring tracings from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Severe extension was defined as bilateral or adjacent to a structure such as the uterine artery, broad ligament, or cervix, and was compared with uterine artery extensions alone.There were 990 unscheduled cesarean deliveries included. Extensions (<i>n</i> = 233) significantly increased with increasing cervical dilation (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), complicating more than 30 and 50% at 6 and 10 cm of cervical dilation, respectively. Apart from this trend, a logistic regression analysis indicated cervical dilation was an independent risk factor for extension. Transfusions of at least 2 units of blood were five times (26 vs. 5%) more likely for patients with severe extensions than no extension (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).Hysterotomy extensions significantly increase with increasing cervical dilation, and cervical dilation is an independent risk factor for extension. A composite measure of severity accounts for different types of extension when quantifying morbidity, but uterine artery extension is the primary driver of maternal morbidity in cases without hysterectomy. · We report higher than previously published rates of extension, in our study of unscheduled cesareans.. · Extension rates rise with cervical dilation-33% at 6 cm, over 50% at 10 cm.. · Cervical dilation is an independent risk factor for extension.. · Severe extensions were fivefold more likely to be transfused two units than no extension.. · The composite measure for severity was driven by uterine artery extensions..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Hysterotomy Extension at Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Jason G Bunn, Albert Tang, Kristen Warncke, Saron Gilazgi, Donald D Mcintire, David B Nelson, Catherine Y Spong, J Seth Hawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2586-3568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine if the rate of hysterotomy extensions increases with increasing cervical dilation in unscheduled cesarean deliveries, and to develop a measure of the severity of hysterotomy extension for quantifying morbidity.This is a retrospective study of unscheduled cesarean deliveries relating to labor dystocia and/or nonreassuring tracings from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Severe extension was defined as bilateral or adjacent to a structure such as the uterine artery, broad ligament, or cervix, and was compared with uterine artery extensions alone.There were 990 unscheduled cesarean deliveries included. Extensions (<i>n</i> = 233) significantly increased with increasing cervical dilation (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), complicating more than 30 and 50% at 6 and 10 cm of cervical dilation, respectively. Apart from this trend, a logistic regression analysis indicated cervical dilation was an independent risk factor for extension. Transfusions of at least 2 units of blood were five times (26 vs. 5%) more likely for patients with severe extensions than no extension (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).Hysterotomy extensions significantly increase with increasing cervical dilation, and cervical dilation is an independent risk factor for extension. A composite measure of severity accounts for different types of extension when quantifying morbidity, but uterine artery extension is the primary driver of maternal morbidity in cases without hysterectomy. · We report higher than previously published rates of extension, in our study of unscheduled cesareans.. · Extension rates rise with cervical dilation-33% at 6 cm, over 50% at 10 cm.. · Cervical dilation is an independent risk factor for extension.. · Severe extensions were fivefold more likely to be transfused two units than no extension.. · The composite measure for severity was driven by uterine artery extensions..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2586-3568\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2586-3568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定剖宫产的剖宫产率是否随着宫颈扩张的增加而增加,并制定一种衡量剖宫产严重程度的方法来量化发病率。这是一项回顾性研究,从2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日,与难产和/或不可靠追踪有关的计划外剖宫产。重度伸展被定义为双侧或靠近子宫动脉、阔韧带或子宫颈等结构,并与子宫动脉单独伸展进行比较。其中包括990例计划外剖宫产。伸展(n = 233)随着宫颈扩张的增加而显著增加(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Hysterotomy Extension at Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery.

This study aimed to determine if the rate of hysterotomy extensions increases with increasing cervical dilation in unscheduled cesarean deliveries, and to develop a measure of the severity of hysterotomy extension for quantifying morbidity.This is a retrospective study of unscheduled cesarean deliveries relating to labor dystocia and/or nonreassuring tracings from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Severe extension was defined as bilateral or adjacent to a structure such as the uterine artery, broad ligament, or cervix, and was compared with uterine artery extensions alone.There were 990 unscheduled cesarean deliveries included. Extensions (n = 233) significantly increased with increasing cervical dilation (p < 0.0001), complicating more than 30 and 50% at 6 and 10 cm of cervical dilation, respectively. Apart from this trend, a logistic regression analysis indicated cervical dilation was an independent risk factor for extension. Transfusions of at least 2 units of blood were five times (26 vs. 5%) more likely for patients with severe extensions than no extension (p < 0.0001).Hysterotomy extensions significantly increase with increasing cervical dilation, and cervical dilation is an independent risk factor for extension. A composite measure of severity accounts for different types of extension when quantifying morbidity, but uterine artery extension is the primary driver of maternal morbidity in cases without hysterectomy. · We report higher than previously published rates of extension, in our study of unscheduled cesareans.. · Extension rates rise with cervical dilation-33% at 6 cm, over 50% at 10 cm.. · Cervical dilation is an independent risk factor for extension.. · Severe extensions were fivefold more likely to be transfused two units than no extension.. · The composite measure for severity was driven by uterine artery extensions..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信