与不连贯的生活:实施欧洲生物多样性政策一体化恢复政策的实践见解。

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ambio Pub Date : 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2
Fabian Pröbstl, Yves Zinngrebe, Michael Böcher, Sophia Schmid, Mathias Scholz, Barbara Stammel, Frank Hüesker
{"title":"与不连贯的生活:实施欧洲生物多样性政策一体化恢复政策的实践见解。","authors":"Fabian Pröbstl,&nbsp;Yves Zinngrebe,&nbsp;Michael Böcher,&nbsp;Sophia Schmid,&nbsp;Mathias Scholz,&nbsp;Barbara Stammel,&nbsp;Frank Hüesker","doi":"10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Policy incoherence is an omnipresent challenge in public administration. Focusing on the joint implementation of the European Water Framework Directive and the Habitats Directive, we analyze how administrative fragmentation hampers river restoration projects at the sub-national level in Germany. By shifting the analytical focus to institutional and administrative factors, we reveal barriers at institutional, processual and individual levels. We find that the failure of river restoration projects stems not only from practical hurdles, such as lack of resources, information, or manpower, but also from more fundamental flaws in the administrative arrangements. Based on a multi-stakeholder consultation, we argue that both bottom-up and top-down approaches can support better coordination and a local mandate for joint implementation. In particular, state-level planning can help reduce local coordination costs in the short term. The analysis highlights the critical role of individual actors and leadership, reframing and cross-sectoral coordination for policy integration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"54 10","pages":"1635 - 1647"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living with the incoherent: Practical insights on implementing European restoration policies for biodiversity policy integration\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Pröbstl,&nbsp;Yves Zinngrebe,&nbsp;Michael Böcher,&nbsp;Sophia Schmid,&nbsp;Mathias Scholz,&nbsp;Barbara Stammel,&nbsp;Frank Hüesker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Policy incoherence is an omnipresent challenge in public administration. Focusing on the joint implementation of the European Water Framework Directive and the Habitats Directive, we analyze how administrative fragmentation hampers river restoration projects at the sub-national level in Germany. By shifting the analytical focus to institutional and administrative factors, we reveal barriers at institutional, processual and individual levels. We find that the failure of river restoration projects stems not only from practical hurdles, such as lack of resources, information, or manpower, but also from more fundamental flaws in the administrative arrangements. Based on a multi-stakeholder consultation, we argue that both bottom-up and top-down approaches can support better coordination and a local mandate for joint implementation. In particular, state-level planning can help reduce local coordination costs in the short term. The analysis highlights the critical role of individual actors and leadership, reframing and cross-sectoral coordination for policy integration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambio\",\"volume\":\"54 10\",\"pages\":\"1635 - 1647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策不连贯是公共行政中无处不在的挑战。着眼于《欧洲水框架指令》和《栖息地指令》的联合实施,我们分析了行政碎片化如何阻碍德国次国家层面的河流恢复项目。通过将分析重点转移到制度和行政因素,我们揭示了制度、程序和个人层面的障碍。我们发现,河流修复工程的失败,不仅源于资源、信息、人力等现实障碍,更源于更根本的行政安排缺陷。在多方利益相关者协商的基础上,我们认为自下而上和自上而下的方法都可以支持更好的协调和共同实施的地方授权。特别是,州一级的规划可以在短期内帮助减少地方协调成本。分析强调了个人行为者和领导、重新规划和跨部门协调在政策一体化方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living with the incoherent: Practical insights on implementing European restoration policies for biodiversity policy integration

Policy incoherence is an omnipresent challenge in public administration. Focusing on the joint implementation of the European Water Framework Directive and the Habitats Directive, we analyze how administrative fragmentation hampers river restoration projects at the sub-national level in Germany. By shifting the analytical focus to institutional and administrative factors, we reveal barriers at institutional, processual and individual levels. We find that the failure of river restoration projects stems not only from practical hurdles, such as lack of resources, information, or manpower, but also from more fundamental flaws in the administrative arrangements. Based on a multi-stakeholder consultation, we argue that both bottom-up and top-down approaches can support better coordination and a local mandate for joint implementation. In particular, state-level planning can help reduce local coordination costs in the short term. The analysis highlights the critical role of individual actors and leadership, reframing and cross-sectoral coordination for policy integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信