Corey Ambrose, Brandon Nakashima, Amanda Hambrecht, Kazuhide Matsushima, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Morgan Schellenberg
{"title":"创伤胸骨切开术闭合:引流管大小可能有影响。","authors":"Corey Ambrose, Brandon Nakashima, Amanda Hambrecht, Kazuhide Matsushima, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Morgan Schellenberg","doi":"10.1177/00031348251339531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSternotomy for trauma (ST) can be life-saving, but optimal chest closure techniques and their impact on outcomes remain unclear. This study examines the association between mediastinal drain size used during ST closure and patient outcomes to determine if larger bore drain placement may mitigate need for reintervention after definitive chest closure.MethodsA retrospective review (2015-2023) of all ST patients at an ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center was conducted, excluding intraoperative deaths. The primary outcome was mediastinal reintervention, defined as redo sternotomy or percutaneous mediastinal drainage after closure. Patients were categorized based on mediastinal drain size: small bore drains (≤15 French) (SBD) vs large bore drains (>15 French) (LBD).ResultsForty-four patients were included: 18 (41%) in the SBD group and 26 (59%) in the LBD group. The median age was 30 years, and most were male (98%). Penetrating trauma was the primary mechanism of injury, and pericardial closure techniques were similar between groups. Mediastinal reintervention for treatment or prevention of cardiac tamponade occurred more frequently in the SBD group (22% vs 4%; <i>P</i> = 0.07).ConclusionAlthough mediastinal reintervention following ST was rare, SBD placement was associated with a higher incidence of reintervention compared to LBD, potentially due to inadequate mediastinal drainage. While not statistically significant, these findings suggest that larger bore drains may reduce the risk of postoperative cardiac tamponade. Multicenter study is warranted to explore these findings further with a larger patient sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1876-1881"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trauma Sternotomy Closure: Drain Size May Matter.\",\"authors\":\"Corey Ambrose, Brandon Nakashima, Amanda Hambrecht, Kazuhide Matsushima, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Morgan Schellenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251339531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSternotomy for trauma (ST) can be life-saving, but optimal chest closure techniques and their impact on outcomes remain unclear. This study examines the association between mediastinal drain size used during ST closure and patient outcomes to determine if larger bore drain placement may mitigate need for reintervention after definitive chest closure.MethodsA retrospective review (2015-2023) of all ST patients at an ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center was conducted, excluding intraoperative deaths. The primary outcome was mediastinal reintervention, defined as redo sternotomy or percutaneous mediastinal drainage after closure. Patients were categorized based on mediastinal drain size: small bore drains (≤15 French) (SBD) vs large bore drains (>15 French) (LBD).ResultsForty-four patients were included: 18 (41%) in the SBD group and 26 (59%) in the LBD group. The median age was 30 years, and most were male (98%). Penetrating trauma was the primary mechanism of injury, and pericardial closure techniques were similar between groups. Mediastinal reintervention for treatment or prevention of cardiac tamponade occurred more frequently in the SBD group (22% vs 4%; <i>P</i> = 0.07).ConclusionAlthough mediastinal reintervention following ST was rare, SBD placement was associated with a higher incidence of reintervention compared to LBD, potentially due to inadequate mediastinal drainage. While not statistically significant, these findings suggest that larger bore drains may reduce the risk of postoperative cardiac tamponade. Multicenter study is warranted to explore these findings further with a larger patient sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1876-1881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251339531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251339531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景胸骨切开术治疗创伤(ST)可以挽救生命,但最佳的胸闭合技术及其对预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨ST段闭合时使用的纵隔引流管尺寸与患者预后之间的关系,以确定大口径引流管放置是否可以减少最终胸腔闭合后再次干预的需要。方法回顾性分析2015-2023年在一家acs认证的一级创伤中心收治的ST患者,不包括术中死亡。主要结局是纵隔再干预,定义为闭合后重新开胸或经皮纵隔引流。患者根据纵隔引流管的大小进行分类:小孔引流管(≤15 French) (SBD) vs大孔引流管(bbb15 French) (LBD)。结果共纳入44例患者:SBD组18例(41%),LBD组26例(59%)。中位年龄为30岁,大多数为男性(98%)。穿透性创伤是主要的损伤机制,两组间心包闭合技术相似。纵隔再干预治疗或预防心包填塞的发生率在SBD组更高(22% vs 4%;P = 0.07)。结论:虽然ST后纵隔再干预很少见,但与LBD相比,SBD放置与更高的再干预发生率相关,可能是由于纵隔引流不足。虽然没有统计学上的显著性,但这些发现表明,大口径引流管可能降低术后心脏填塞的风险。多中心研究是有必要的,以更大的患者样本量进一步探索这些发现。
BackgroundSternotomy for trauma (ST) can be life-saving, but optimal chest closure techniques and their impact on outcomes remain unclear. This study examines the association between mediastinal drain size used during ST closure and patient outcomes to determine if larger bore drain placement may mitigate need for reintervention after definitive chest closure.MethodsA retrospective review (2015-2023) of all ST patients at an ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center was conducted, excluding intraoperative deaths. The primary outcome was mediastinal reintervention, defined as redo sternotomy or percutaneous mediastinal drainage after closure. Patients were categorized based on mediastinal drain size: small bore drains (≤15 French) (SBD) vs large bore drains (>15 French) (LBD).ResultsForty-four patients were included: 18 (41%) in the SBD group and 26 (59%) in the LBD group. The median age was 30 years, and most were male (98%). Penetrating trauma was the primary mechanism of injury, and pericardial closure techniques were similar between groups. Mediastinal reintervention for treatment or prevention of cardiac tamponade occurred more frequently in the SBD group (22% vs 4%; P = 0.07).ConclusionAlthough mediastinal reintervention following ST was rare, SBD placement was associated with a higher incidence of reintervention compared to LBD, potentially due to inadequate mediastinal drainage. While not statistically significant, these findings suggest that larger bore drains may reduce the risk of postoperative cardiac tamponade. Multicenter study is warranted to explore these findings further with a larger patient sample size.
期刊介绍:
The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.