{"title":"剖宫产中单胎与双胎妊娠的产妇发病率。","authors":"Mia Heiligenstein, Nathan Fox","doi":"10.1055/a-2565-9208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the prevalence of twin pregnancies rises, and because of the high cesarean rate in twin pregnancies, it is imperative to estimate the maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery. This study aims to clarify whether twin gestations undergoing cesarean delivery are at increased risk for maternal morbidity compared with singleton pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery.This study was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton and twin gestations who underwent cesarean delivery in a single maternal fetal medicine and obstetrical practice from 2005 to 2023. All patients who underwent a cesarean delivery with a liveborn were included with the exception of patients with a history of a prior myomectomy, known placenta previa, or known placenta accreta spectrum. An electronic medical record was used to obtain baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes. Our primary outcome was a composite outcome for maternal morbidity. We first compared all patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery and performed subgroup analyses of patients laboring prior to cesarean delivery, scheduled primary cesarean section without labor, and repeat cesarean section. Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and student's <i>t</i>-test were utilized for statistical analysis.Of the 2,872 women meeting inclusion criteria, 2,250 had singleton pregnancies while 622 had twin pregnancies. Baseline characteristics were largely similar between groups, except for higher body mass index and incidence of preeclampsia in twin gestations. In patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery, the composite outcome for maternal morbidity did not significantly differ between singleton and twin pregnancies (0.8 vs. 1.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.172). However, secondary outcomes revealed higher blood loss in twin pregnancies, evidenced by both elevated estimated blood loss (EBL) and increased rate of blood transfusion (4.7 vs. 1.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). These findings remained consistent across all subgroup analyses.We observed no differences in major maternal morbidities between patients undergoing cesarean delivery for singleton or twin gestations. However, we did find significant differences in EBL and transfusion requirements for women with twin gestations. · There are no differences in major maternal morbidities.. · This is between patients undergoing cesarean delivery for singleton versus twin gestations.. · This includes with the exception of higher EBL and transfusion requirements in twin gestations..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal Morbidity in Singleton versus Twin Gestations Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Mia Heiligenstein, Nathan Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2565-9208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the prevalence of twin pregnancies rises, and because of the high cesarean rate in twin pregnancies, it is imperative to estimate the maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery. This study aims to clarify whether twin gestations undergoing cesarean delivery are at increased risk for maternal morbidity compared with singleton pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery.This study was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton and twin gestations who underwent cesarean delivery in a single maternal fetal medicine and obstetrical practice from 2005 to 2023. All patients who underwent a cesarean delivery with a liveborn were included with the exception of patients with a history of a prior myomectomy, known placenta previa, or known placenta accreta spectrum. An electronic medical record was used to obtain baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes. Our primary outcome was a composite outcome for maternal morbidity. We first compared all patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery and performed subgroup analyses of patients laboring prior to cesarean delivery, scheduled primary cesarean section without labor, and repeat cesarean section. Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and student's <i>t</i>-test were utilized for statistical analysis.Of the 2,872 women meeting inclusion criteria, 2,250 had singleton pregnancies while 622 had twin pregnancies. Baseline characteristics were largely similar between groups, except for higher body mass index and incidence of preeclampsia in twin gestations. In patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery, the composite outcome for maternal morbidity did not significantly differ between singleton and twin pregnancies (0.8 vs. 1.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.172). However, secondary outcomes revealed higher blood loss in twin pregnancies, evidenced by both elevated estimated blood loss (EBL) and increased rate of blood transfusion (4.7 vs. 1.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). These findings remained consistent across all subgroup analyses.We observed no differences in major maternal morbidities between patients undergoing cesarean delivery for singleton or twin gestations. However, we did find significant differences in EBL and transfusion requirements for women with twin gestations. · There are no differences in major maternal morbidities.. · This is between patients undergoing cesarean delivery for singleton versus twin gestations.. · This includes with the exception of higher EBL and transfusion requirements in twin gestations..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2565-9208\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2565-9208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着双胎妊娠发生率的上升,以及双胎妊娠剖宫产率的升高,对双胎妊娠剖宫产的产妇发病率进行估计是十分必要的。本研究旨在阐明是否双胎妊娠剖宫产比单胎妊娠剖宫产有更高的产妇发病风险。本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,对2005年至2023年在单胎医学和产科实践中接受剖宫产的所有单胎和双胎妊娠患者进行研究。除既往有子宫肌瘤切除术史、已知前置胎盘或已知胎盘增生谱的患者外,所有接受剖宫产的活产儿患者均被纳入研究。使用电子病历获取基线特征和产妇结局。我们的主要结局是产妇发病率的综合结局。我们首先比较了所有接受初次剖宫产的患者,并对剖宫产前分娩、计划初次剖宫产而不分娩和再次剖宫产的患者进行了亚组分析。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和学生t检验进行统计分析。在符合纳入标准的2872名妇女中,2250名是单胎妊娠,622名是双胎妊娠。除了双胎妊娠中较高的体重指数和先兆子痫发生率外,各组之间的基线特征基本相似。在初次剖宫产的患者中,单胎和双胎妊娠的产妇发病率的综合结局无显著差异(0.8 vs 1.4%;p = 0.172)。然而,次要结局显示双胎妊娠的失血量更高,其证据是估计失血量(EBL)升高和输血率增加(4.7 vs 1.8%;p
Maternal Morbidity in Singleton versus Twin Gestations Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.
As the prevalence of twin pregnancies rises, and because of the high cesarean rate in twin pregnancies, it is imperative to estimate the maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery. This study aims to clarify whether twin gestations undergoing cesarean delivery are at increased risk for maternal morbidity compared with singleton pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery.This study was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton and twin gestations who underwent cesarean delivery in a single maternal fetal medicine and obstetrical practice from 2005 to 2023. All patients who underwent a cesarean delivery with a liveborn were included with the exception of patients with a history of a prior myomectomy, known placenta previa, or known placenta accreta spectrum. An electronic medical record was used to obtain baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes. Our primary outcome was a composite outcome for maternal morbidity. We first compared all patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery and performed subgroup analyses of patients laboring prior to cesarean delivery, scheduled primary cesarean section without labor, and repeat cesarean section. Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and student's t-test were utilized for statistical analysis.Of the 2,872 women meeting inclusion criteria, 2,250 had singleton pregnancies while 622 had twin pregnancies. Baseline characteristics were largely similar between groups, except for higher body mass index and incidence of preeclampsia in twin gestations. In patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery, the composite outcome for maternal morbidity did not significantly differ between singleton and twin pregnancies (0.8 vs. 1.4%; p = 0.172). However, secondary outcomes revealed higher blood loss in twin pregnancies, evidenced by both elevated estimated blood loss (EBL) and increased rate of blood transfusion (4.7 vs. 1.8%; p < 0.001). These findings remained consistent across all subgroup analyses.We observed no differences in major maternal morbidities between patients undergoing cesarean delivery for singleton or twin gestations. However, we did find significant differences in EBL and transfusion requirements for women with twin gestations. · There are no differences in major maternal morbidities.. · This is between patients undergoing cesarean delivery for singleton versus twin gestations.. · This includes with the exception of higher EBL and transfusion requirements in twin gestations..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.