{"title":"澳大利亚孕妇饮食质量、营养自我效能感与营养信息来源的关系:一项横断面分析。","authors":"Akela Phillips, Tamara Bucher, Penta Pristijono, Sasha Fenton","doi":"10.1177/08901171251336931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo assess diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy in pregnant women, the relationship between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy, and differences in diet quality and self-efficacy when information obtained from health and non-health professionals.DesignObservational cross-sectional study.SettingOnline survey.SampleAustralian pregnant women.MeasuresAustralian Eating Survey measured diet quality, Ralf Schwarzer and Britta Renner nutrition self-efficacy scale measured nutrition self-efficacy.AnalysisSpearman's correlation measured the association between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy. Linear regression examined the influence of nutrition self-efficacy on diet quality. T-tests examined differences in diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy scores in groups who did/did not obtain nutrition information from health professionals.ResultsParticipants (n = 171) (mean (SD) age 32.5 (3.9) years, 81.9% born in Australia) reported a mean diet quality score of 33.9 (8.7) out of 73 and mean nutrition self-efficacy score of 14.7 (3.7) out of 20. A moderate positive linear relationship was observed between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = 0.27, <i>P</i> < .001). Nutrition information was obtained by 88%, most commonly via the internet. Diet quality scores were not significantly different when nutrition information was obtained from health professionals (<i>t</i>(24) = -0.823, <i>P</i> = .32), however, nutrition self-efficacy scores were significantly higher (<i>U</i> = 856, <i>z</i> = 2.18, <i>P</i> = .03).ConclusionPregnant women report poor diet quality. Improving nutrition self-efficacy may be effective for improving diet quality. Evidence-based nutrition information should be accessible via the internet and promoted by health authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251336931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Diet Quality, Nutrition Self-Efficacy and Sources of Nutrition Information in Australian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Akela Phillips, Tamara Bucher, Penta Pristijono, Sasha Fenton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251336931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeTo assess diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy in pregnant women, the relationship between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy, and differences in diet quality and self-efficacy when information obtained from health and non-health professionals.DesignObservational cross-sectional study.SettingOnline survey.SampleAustralian pregnant women.MeasuresAustralian Eating Survey measured diet quality, Ralf Schwarzer and Britta Renner nutrition self-efficacy scale measured nutrition self-efficacy.AnalysisSpearman's correlation measured the association between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy. Linear regression examined the influence of nutrition self-efficacy on diet quality. T-tests examined differences in diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy scores in groups who did/did not obtain nutrition information from health professionals.ResultsParticipants (n = 171) (mean (SD) age 32.5 (3.9) years, 81.9% born in Australia) reported a mean diet quality score of 33.9 (8.7) out of 73 and mean nutrition self-efficacy score of 14.7 (3.7) out of 20. A moderate positive linear relationship was observed between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = 0.27, <i>P</i> < .001). Nutrition information was obtained by 88%, most commonly via the internet. Diet quality scores were not significantly different when nutrition information was obtained from health professionals (<i>t</i>(24) = -0.823, <i>P</i> = .32), however, nutrition self-efficacy scores were significantly higher (<i>U</i> = 856, <i>z</i> = 2.18, <i>P</i> = .03).ConclusionPregnant women report poor diet quality. Improving nutrition self-efficacy may be effective for improving diet quality. Evidence-based nutrition information should be accessible via the internet and promoted by health authorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251336931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251336931\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251336931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估孕妇的饮食质量和营养自我效能感,饮食质量和营养自我效能感之间的关系,以及从卫生专业人员和非卫生专业人员处获得的饮食质量和自我效能感的差异。设计:观察性横断面研究。SettingOnline调查。以澳大利亚孕妇为例。测量方法:澳大利亚饮食调查测量饮食质量,拉尔夫·施瓦泽和布里塔·雷纳营养自我效能量表测量营养自我效能。斯皮尔曼的相关性测量了饮食质量和营养自我效能之间的关系。线性回归检验营养自我效能感对饮食质量的影响。t检验检验了从健康专家那里获得营养信息的组和没有从健康专家那里获得营养信息的组在饮食质量和营养自我效能评分上的差异。结果171名参与者(平均(SD)年龄32.5(3.9)岁,81.9%出生在澳大利亚)的平均饮食质量得分为33.9(8.7)分(总分73分),平均营养自我效能得分为14.7(总分20)分(总分20)。饮食质量与营养自我效能感呈中等正线性关系(rs = 0.27, P < 0.001)。88%的人获得营养信息,最常见的是通过互联网。从卫生专业人员获得营养信息时,饮食质量得分差异无统计学意义(t(24) = -0.823, P = 0.32),但营养自我效能得分显著高于卫生专业人员(U = 856, z = 2.18, P = 0.03)。结论孕妇饮食质量较差。提高营养自我效能感可能对改善饮食质量有效。基于证据的营养信息应通过互联网提供,并由卫生当局推动。
The Relationship Between Diet Quality, Nutrition Self-Efficacy and Sources of Nutrition Information in Australian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
PurposeTo assess diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy in pregnant women, the relationship between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy, and differences in diet quality and self-efficacy when information obtained from health and non-health professionals.DesignObservational cross-sectional study.SettingOnline survey.SampleAustralian pregnant women.MeasuresAustralian Eating Survey measured diet quality, Ralf Schwarzer and Britta Renner nutrition self-efficacy scale measured nutrition self-efficacy.AnalysisSpearman's correlation measured the association between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy. Linear regression examined the influence of nutrition self-efficacy on diet quality. T-tests examined differences in diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy scores in groups who did/did not obtain nutrition information from health professionals.ResultsParticipants (n = 171) (mean (SD) age 32.5 (3.9) years, 81.9% born in Australia) reported a mean diet quality score of 33.9 (8.7) out of 73 and mean nutrition self-efficacy score of 14.7 (3.7) out of 20. A moderate positive linear relationship was observed between diet quality and nutrition self-efficacy (rs = 0.27, P < .001). Nutrition information was obtained by 88%, most commonly via the internet. Diet quality scores were not significantly different when nutrition information was obtained from health professionals (t(24) = -0.823, P = .32), however, nutrition self-efficacy scores were significantly higher (U = 856, z = 2.18, P = .03).ConclusionPregnant women report poor diet quality. Improving nutrition self-efficacy may be effective for improving diet quality. Evidence-based nutrition information should be accessible via the internet and promoted by health authorities.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.