创伤用氨甲环酸:基于CRASH-2和CRASH-3试验的最佳给药时机。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Ian Roberts
{"title":"创伤用氨甲环酸:基于CRASH-2和CRASH-3试验的最佳给药时机。","authors":"Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Ian Roberts","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid reduces bleeding deaths in trauma patients, but the treatment benefit depends on the time from injury. It is recommended that tranexamic acid be administered immediately and only within 3 h of injury; however, the optimal criteria have not been adequately studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied machine learning-based causal forest models to investigate heterogeneity in the effects of tranexamic acid on 24-hour mortality rate conditional on covariates (for example age, sex, time from injury, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS). We analysed data on 28 448 trauma patients in the CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 randomized trials. We used the policytree algorithm to determine the optimal criteria for tranexamic acid treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The causal forest models showed heterogeneity in the effects of tranexamic acid on 24-hour mortality rate. The relative risk reduction was greatest in patients treated within 2 h of injury but thereafter decreased rapidly. The pattern was similar regardless of age or systolic blood pressure, although with decreasing GCS, the time to treatment effects were weaker, with benefits beyond 3 h. The largest absolute risk reductions were in patients with a low blood pressure and a low GCS when treated soon after injury. The optimal criterion was statistically determined as patients within 2 h of the injury or with GCS < 9.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tranexamic acid administration was found to be beneficial when given within 2 h of injury. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, the treatment benefits may persist beyond the 2-hour window.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tranexamic acid for trauma: optimal timing of administration based on the CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 trials.\",\"authors\":\"Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Ian Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znaf079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid reduces bleeding deaths in trauma patients, but the treatment benefit depends on the time from injury. It is recommended that tranexamic acid be administered immediately and only within 3 h of injury; however, the optimal criteria have not been adequately studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied machine learning-based causal forest models to investigate heterogeneity in the effects of tranexamic acid on 24-hour mortality rate conditional on covariates (for example age, sex, time from injury, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS). We analysed data on 28 448 trauma patients in the CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 randomized trials. We used the policytree algorithm to determine the optimal criteria for tranexamic acid treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The causal forest models showed heterogeneity in the effects of tranexamic acid on 24-hour mortality rate. The relative risk reduction was greatest in patients treated within 2 h of injury but thereafter decreased rapidly. The pattern was similar regardless of age or systolic blood pressure, although with decreasing GCS, the time to treatment effects were weaker, with benefits beyond 3 h. The largest absolute risk reductions were in patients with a low blood pressure and a low GCS when treated soon after injury. The optimal criterion was statistically determined as patients within 2 h of the injury or with GCS < 9.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tranexamic acid administration was found to be beneficial when given within 2 h of injury. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, the treatment benefits may persist beyond the 2-hour window.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"112 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf079\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氨甲环酸可减少创伤患者出血性死亡,但治疗效果取决于创伤后的时间。建议立即使用氨甲环酸,且仅在损伤后3小时内使用;然而,最佳标准尚未得到充分研究。方法:我们应用基于机器学习的因果森林模型来研究氨甲环酸对24小时死亡率影响的异质性,这些影响取决于协变量(例如年龄、性别、受伤时间、收缩压和格拉斯哥昏迷量表,GCS)。我们分析了CRASH-2和CRASH-3随机试验中28448名创伤患者的数据。我们使用政策树算法来确定氨甲环酸治疗的最佳标准。结果:因果森林模型显示氨甲环酸对24小时死亡率的影响具有异质性。在受伤后2小时内治疗的患者相对风险降低最大,但此后迅速下降。无论年龄或收缩压如何,这种模式都是相似的,尽管随着GCS的降低,治疗效果的时间较弱,超过3小时的益处。绝对风险降低最大的是在损伤后不久治疗的低血压和低GCS的患者。以伤后2小时内或GCS < 9为最优标准。结论:在损伤后2小时内给予氨甲环酸是有益的。对于严重创伤性脑损伤患者,治疗效果可能持续超过2小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tranexamic acid for trauma: optimal timing of administration based on the CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 trials.

Background: Tranexamic acid reduces bleeding deaths in trauma patients, but the treatment benefit depends on the time from injury. It is recommended that tranexamic acid be administered immediately and only within 3 h of injury; however, the optimal criteria have not been adequately studied.

Methods: We applied machine learning-based causal forest models to investigate heterogeneity in the effects of tranexamic acid on 24-hour mortality rate conditional on covariates (for example age, sex, time from injury, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS). We analysed data on 28 448 trauma patients in the CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 randomized trials. We used the policytree algorithm to determine the optimal criteria for tranexamic acid treatment.

Results: The causal forest models showed heterogeneity in the effects of tranexamic acid on 24-hour mortality rate. The relative risk reduction was greatest in patients treated within 2 h of injury but thereafter decreased rapidly. The pattern was similar regardless of age or systolic blood pressure, although with decreasing GCS, the time to treatment effects were weaker, with benefits beyond 3 h. The largest absolute risk reductions were in patients with a low blood pressure and a low GCS when treated soon after injury. The optimal criterion was statistically determined as patients within 2 h of the injury or with GCS < 9.

Conclusions: Tranexamic acid administration was found to be beneficial when given within 2 h of injury. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, the treatment benefits may persist beyond the 2-hour window.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信