阿达木单抗血清浓度选择类风湿性关节炎患者随后的生物DMARD (addora开关):一项盲法随机试验-治疗试验的结果。

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Maike H M Wientjes, Sadaf Atiqi, Gerrit J Wolbink, Michael T Nurmohamed, Maarten Boers, Femke Hooijberg, Theo Rispens, Annick de Vries, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Sofia Ramiro, Noortje van Herwaarden, Bart J F van den Bemt, Alfons A den Broeder
{"title":"阿达木单抗血清浓度选择类风湿性关节炎患者随后的生物DMARD (addora开关):一项盲法随机试验-治疗试验的结果。","authors":"Maike H M Wientjes, Sadaf Atiqi, Gerrit J Wolbink, Michael T Nurmohamed, Maarten Boers, Femke Hooijberg, Theo Rispens, Annick de Vries, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Sofia Ramiro, Noortje van Herwaarden, Bart J F van den Bemt, Alfons A den Broeder","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) discontinue adalimumab due to ineffectiveness. The next treatment step can be another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or a biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of serum drug levels may help guide this choice. This study evaluated whether switching treatments based on adalimumab trough levels is more effective than random switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 24-week, multicentre, triple-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA who stopped adalimumab due to inefficacy (disease activity score based on 28 joint count and C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] >2.9) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a TDM-based or random switching (control) strategy. The primary outcome was the difference in mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP between groups at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2020 to November 2023, 83 consecutive patients with RA were included, with 78 initiating a new b/tsDMARD (TDM-based group: n = 38; control: n = 40). The mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP was 3.15 in both groups (TDM: SD, 0.99; control: SD, 1.01; 95% CI of difference: -0.46 to 0.47). There were no significant differences between the groups in flare rates, escape medication use, disease activity, or adverse events. Receiver operating characteristic analyses in the control group found no predictive value of adalimumab levels for response to TNFi or non-TNFi.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching treatments based on adalimumab trough levels was not more effective than random switching in patients with RA who failed adalimumab treatment. Therefore, serum drug level measurements to guide therapy choices in this context is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adalimumab serum concentration to choose a subsequent biological DMARD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ADDORA-switch): results of a blinded randomised test-treatment trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maike H M Wientjes, Sadaf Atiqi, Gerrit J Wolbink, Michael T Nurmohamed, Maarten Boers, Femke Hooijberg, Theo Rispens, Annick de Vries, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Sofia Ramiro, Noortje van Herwaarden, Bart J F van den Bemt, Alfons A den Broeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) discontinue adalimumab due to ineffectiveness. The next treatment step can be another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or a biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of serum drug levels may help guide this choice. This study evaluated whether switching treatments based on adalimumab trough levels is more effective than random switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 24-week, multicentre, triple-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA who stopped adalimumab due to inefficacy (disease activity score based on 28 joint count and C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] >2.9) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a TDM-based or random switching (control) strategy. The primary outcome was the difference in mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP between groups at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2020 to November 2023, 83 consecutive patients with RA were included, with 78 initiating a new b/tsDMARD (TDM-based group: n = 38; control: n = 40). The mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP was 3.15 in both groups (TDM: SD, 0.99; control: SD, 1.01; 95% CI of difference: -0.46 to 0.47). There were no significant differences between the groups in flare rates, escape medication use, disease activity, or adverse events. Receiver operating characteristic analyses in the control group found no predictive value of adalimumab levels for response to TNFi or non-TNFi.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching treatments based on adalimumab trough levels was not more effective than random switching in patients with RA who failed adalimumab treatment. Therefore, serum drug level measurements to guide therapy choices in this context is not recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:相当比例的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者由于无效而停用阿达木单抗。下一个治疗步骤可以是另一种肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)或生物/靶向合成疾病改善抗风湿药物(b/tsDMARD)。治疗药物监测(TDM)的血清药物水平可能有助于指导这种选择。本研究评估了基于阿达木单抗谷底水平的转换治疗是否比随机转换更有效。方法:在这项为期24周的多中心、三盲、随机对照试验中,纳入了因阿达木单抗无效(基于28个关节计数和c -反应蛋白[DAS28-CRP] >2.9的疾病活动性评分)而停用阿达木单抗的RA患者。参与者被随机分配(1:1)到基于tdm或随机切换(控制)策略。主要结局是24周时各组间平均时间加权DAS28-CRP的差异。结果:从2020年7月到2023年11月,纳入了83例RA患者,其中78例开始使用新的b/tsDMARD (tdm为基础的组:n = 38;对照组:n = 40)。两组平均时间加权DAS28-CRP为3.15 (TDM: SD, 0.99;对照:SD, 1.01;95%差异置信区间:-0.46 ~ 0.47)。两组之间在耀斑率、逃避药物使用、疾病活动性或不良事件方面没有显著差异。对照组的受试者工作特征分析发现阿达木单抗水平对TNFi或非TNFi的反应没有预测价值。结论:在阿达木单抗治疗失败的RA患者中,基于阿达木单抗谷底水平转换治疗并不比随机转换更有效。因此,在这种情况下,不建议使用血清药物水平测量来指导治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adalimumab serum concentration to choose a subsequent biological DMARD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ADDORA-switch): results of a blinded randomised test-treatment trial.

Objectives: A substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) discontinue adalimumab due to ineffectiveness. The next treatment step can be another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or a biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of serum drug levels may help guide this choice. This study evaluated whether switching treatments based on adalimumab trough levels is more effective than random switching.

Methods: In this 24-week, multicentre, triple-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA who stopped adalimumab due to inefficacy (disease activity score based on 28 joint count and C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] >2.9) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a TDM-based or random switching (control) strategy. The primary outcome was the difference in mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP between groups at 24 weeks.

Results: From July 2020 to November 2023, 83 consecutive patients with RA were included, with 78 initiating a new b/tsDMARD (TDM-based group: n = 38; control: n = 40). The mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP was 3.15 in both groups (TDM: SD, 0.99; control: SD, 1.01; 95% CI of difference: -0.46 to 0.47). There were no significant differences between the groups in flare rates, escape medication use, disease activity, or adverse events. Receiver operating characteristic analyses in the control group found no predictive value of adalimumab levels for response to TNFi or non-TNFi.

Conclusions: Switching treatments based on adalimumab trough levels was not more effective than random switching in patients with RA who failed adalimumab treatment. Therefore, serum drug level measurements to guide therapy choices in this context is not recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信