评估加利福尼亚剖宫产后阴道分娩的种族/民族差异和趋势:一项使用关联出生证明和出院记录的回顾性队列研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nicholas Rubashkin, E Nicole Teal, Rebecca J Baer, Saraswathi Vedam, Miriam Kuppermann, Grace Lanouette, Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Melissa G Rosenstein
{"title":"评估加利福尼亚剖宫产后阴道分娩的种族/民族差异和趋势:一项使用关联出生证明和出院记录的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Nicholas Rubashkin, E Nicole Teal, Rebecca J Baer, Saraswathi Vedam, Miriam Kuppermann, Grace Lanouette, Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Melissa G Rosenstein","doi":"10.1055/a-2593-0555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rate to 18% was a Healthy People 2020 goal. Detailed data on racial/ethnic differences in VBAC rates is lacking and can inform efforts to equitably increase VBAC rates. This study aimed to assess racial/ethnic variation in VBAC rates and to describe group trends in VBAC rates in California between 2011 and 2021.This retrospective cohort study used a database of birth certificates linked to hospital discharge records. We analyzed singleton, term live births among people who had a history of at least one prior cesarean birth, no identified contraindications to a vaginal birth, and self-identified their racial/ethnic group as Hispanic or non-Hispanic (American Indian-Alaskan Native (AIAN), Asian, Black, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or white). VBAC births were identified from birth certificate records. Differences between VBAC rates were assessed using univariable and multivariable Poisson log-linear regression while adjusting for potential confounders.A total of 607,808 birthing people were included (2,234 AIAN, 84,899 Asian, 34,217 Black, 2,559 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 334,116 Hispanic, 149,783 white). Over the study period, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander birthing people had the highest average VBAC rate at 11.5% (AIAN, 6.5%; Asian, 8.8%; Black, 8.0%; Hispanic, 7.4%; white, 9.5%). In adjusted models, Black (aRR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (aRR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61) birthing people were more likely to have a VBAC compared with white birthing people, while Hispanic birthing people were less likely (aRR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). VBAC rates increased significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) over time for all groups except AIAN birthing people.VBAC rates increased for most racial/ethnic groups in California. With the exception of the Hawaiian/Pacific Islander group, there were small and likely not clinically significant differences in the chances for a VBAC across groups. No group in California met the Healthy People 2020 goal VBAC rate of 18%. · VBAC rates increased for most racial/ethnic groups.. · The VBAC rate for AIAN birthing people did not increase.. · No group met the Healthy People 2020 goal VBAC rate of 18%..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Racial/Ethnic Variation and Trends in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Records.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Rubashkin, E Nicole Teal, Rebecca J Baer, Saraswathi Vedam, Miriam Kuppermann, Grace Lanouette, Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Melissa G Rosenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2593-0555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasing the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rate to 18% was a Healthy People 2020 goal. Detailed data on racial/ethnic differences in VBAC rates is lacking and can inform efforts to equitably increase VBAC rates. This study aimed to assess racial/ethnic variation in VBAC rates and to describe group trends in VBAC rates in California between 2011 and 2021.This retrospective cohort study used a database of birth certificates linked to hospital discharge records. We analyzed singleton, term live births among people who had a history of at least one prior cesarean birth, no identified contraindications to a vaginal birth, and self-identified their racial/ethnic group as Hispanic or non-Hispanic (American Indian-Alaskan Native (AIAN), Asian, Black, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or white). VBAC births were identified from birth certificate records. Differences between VBAC rates were assessed using univariable and multivariable Poisson log-linear regression while adjusting for potential confounders.A total of 607,808 birthing people were included (2,234 AIAN, 84,899 Asian, 34,217 Black, 2,559 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 334,116 Hispanic, 149,783 white). Over the study period, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander birthing people had the highest average VBAC rate at 11.5% (AIAN, 6.5%; Asian, 8.8%; Black, 8.0%; Hispanic, 7.4%; white, 9.5%). In adjusted models, Black (aRR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (aRR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61) birthing people were more likely to have a VBAC compared with white birthing people, while Hispanic birthing people were less likely (aRR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). VBAC rates increased significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) over time for all groups except AIAN birthing people.VBAC rates increased for most racial/ethnic groups in California. With the exception of the Hawaiian/Pacific Islander group, there were small and likely not clinically significant differences in the chances for a VBAC across groups. No group in California met the Healthy People 2020 goal VBAC rate of 18%. · VBAC rates increased for most racial/ethnic groups.. · The VBAC rate for AIAN birthing people did not increase.. · No group met the Healthy People 2020 goal VBAC rate of 18%..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2593-0555\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2593-0555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)率提高到18%是健康人2020年的目标。缺乏关于VBAC率的种族/民族差异的详细数据,可以为公平提高VBAC率的努力提供信息。本研究旨在评估VBAC率的种族/民族差异,并描述2011年至2021年间加利福尼亚州VBAC率的群体趋势。这项回顾性队列研究使用了一个与出院记录相关的出生证明数据库。我们分析了至少有一次剖宫产史、无阴道分娩禁忌症、自我认定其种族/民族为西班牙裔或非西班牙裔(美洲印第安人-阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)、亚洲人、黑人、夏威夷/太平洋岛民或白人)的单胎和足月活产的人群。从出生证明记录中确定VBAC出生。在调整潜在混杂因素的同时,使用单变量和多变量泊松对数线性回归评估VBAC率之间的差异。共包括607,808名产妇(2,234名亚裔,84,899名亚裔,34,217名黑人,2,559名夏威夷/太平洋岛民,334,116名西班牙裔,149,783名白人)。在研究期间,夏威夷/太平洋岛民生育人群的平均VBAC率最高,为11.5% (AIAN, 6.5%;亚洲,8.8%;黑人,8.0%;西班牙裔,7.4%;白人,9.5%)。在调整后的模型中,黑人(aRR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11)和夏威夷/太平洋岛民(aRR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61)分娩的人比白人分娩的人更容易发生VBAC,而西班牙裔分娩的人更不可能发生VBAC (aRR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98)。VBAC率显著升高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Racial/Ethnic Variation and Trends in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Records.

Increasing the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rate to 18% was a Healthy People 2020 goal. Detailed data on racial/ethnic differences in VBAC rates is lacking and can inform efforts to equitably increase VBAC rates. This study aimed to assess racial/ethnic variation in VBAC rates and to describe group trends in VBAC rates in California between 2011 and 2021.This retrospective cohort study used a database of birth certificates linked to hospital discharge records. We analyzed singleton, term live births among people who had a history of at least one prior cesarean birth, no identified contraindications to a vaginal birth, and self-identified their racial/ethnic group as Hispanic or non-Hispanic (American Indian-Alaskan Native (AIAN), Asian, Black, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or white). VBAC births were identified from birth certificate records. Differences between VBAC rates were assessed using univariable and multivariable Poisson log-linear regression while adjusting for potential confounders.A total of 607,808 birthing people were included (2,234 AIAN, 84,899 Asian, 34,217 Black, 2,559 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 334,116 Hispanic, 149,783 white). Over the study period, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander birthing people had the highest average VBAC rate at 11.5% (AIAN, 6.5%; Asian, 8.8%; Black, 8.0%; Hispanic, 7.4%; white, 9.5%). In adjusted models, Black (aRR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (aRR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61) birthing people were more likely to have a VBAC compared with white birthing people, while Hispanic birthing people were less likely (aRR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). VBAC rates increased significantly (p < 0.001) over time for all groups except AIAN birthing people.VBAC rates increased for most racial/ethnic groups in California. With the exception of the Hawaiian/Pacific Islander group, there were small and likely not clinically significant differences in the chances for a VBAC across groups. No group in California met the Healthy People 2020 goal VBAC rate of 18%. · VBAC rates increased for most racial/ethnic groups.. · The VBAC rate for AIAN birthing people did not increase.. · No group met the Healthy People 2020 goal VBAC rate of 18%..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信