相互冲突和变化的健康建议及其对癌症预防的影响:社交媒体的使用和信任作为积极的中介。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mary Bruns, Soojung Gina Kim
{"title":"相互冲突和变化的健康建议及其对癌症预防的影响:社交媒体的使用和信任作为积极的中介。","authors":"Mary Bruns, Soojung Gina Kim","doi":"10.1177/08901171251330398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study examines the mediating roles of social media use and trust in the relationship between experts' health recommendations being conflicting and changing and their intention to receive cancer screening tests using the O<sub>1</sub>-S-O<sub>2</sub>-R model.DesignCross-sectional.SettingData were extracted from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 6.SubjectsOf 6252 individuals, 5014 were used in the final analysis. The total weighted sample size is 255,489,241.MeasuresConflicting & Changing Health Recommendations (<i>O</i><sub><i>1</i></sub>): How often experts' health recommendations seem to conflict and change. Social Media Use (<i>S</i>): The use of social media to seek and share health information. Trust in Cancer Information (<i>O</i><sub><i>2</i></sub>): Trust in cancer information from doctors, government health agencies, and scientists. Interest in Cancer Screening in the next year (<i>R</i>).AnalysisMultiple and logistic regressions were performed with the weighted sample. A PROCESS mediation model with a 5000 bootstrapping sample was also performed.ResultsThe perception of health recommendations from experts conflicting was a positive, marginally significant predictor of social media use for seeking and sharing health information (<i>P</i> = .08), which generated higher trust in cancer information from government health agencies (<i>P</i> < .05) and higher intention to receive cancer screening tests within the next year (<i>P</i> < .01).ConclusionsWith strong digital health literacy and appropriate social media algorithms, social media could reinforce cancer screening behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251330398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflicting and Changing Health Recommendations and Their Influence on Cancer Prevention: Social Media Use and Trust as Positive Mediators.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Bruns, Soojung Gina Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251330398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeThis study examines the mediating roles of social media use and trust in the relationship between experts' health recommendations being conflicting and changing and their intention to receive cancer screening tests using the O<sub>1</sub>-S-O<sub>2</sub>-R model.DesignCross-sectional.SettingData were extracted from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 6.SubjectsOf 6252 individuals, 5014 were used in the final analysis. The total weighted sample size is 255,489,241.MeasuresConflicting & Changing Health Recommendations (<i>O</i><sub><i>1</i></sub>): How often experts' health recommendations seem to conflict and change. Social Media Use (<i>S</i>): The use of social media to seek and share health information. Trust in Cancer Information (<i>O</i><sub><i>2</i></sub>): Trust in cancer information from doctors, government health agencies, and scientists. Interest in Cancer Screening in the next year (<i>R</i>).AnalysisMultiple and logistic regressions were performed with the weighted sample. A PROCESS mediation model with a 5000 bootstrapping sample was also performed.ResultsThe perception of health recommendations from experts conflicting was a positive, marginally significant predictor of social media use for seeking and sharing health information (<i>P</i> = .08), which generated higher trust in cancer information from government health agencies (<i>P</i> < .05) and higher intention to receive cancer screening tests within the next year (<i>P</i> < .01).ConclusionsWith strong digital health literacy and appropriate social media algorithms, social media could reinforce cancer screening behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251330398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251330398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251330398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究采用O1-S-O2-R模型,探讨社交媒体使用和信任在专家健康建议冲突和变化与接受癌症筛查意愿之间的关系中的中介作用。数据摘自卫生信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)。6252个人中,有5014人被用于最终分析。总加权样本量为255,489,241。措施冲突和变化的健康建议(01):专家的健康建议似乎冲突和变化的频率。社交媒体使用(S):使用社交媒体寻求和分享健康信息。信任癌症信息(O2):信任来自医生、政府卫生机构和科学家的癌症信息。下一年对癌症筛检的兴趣(右)。对加权样本进行多元回归和逻辑回归。还执行了具有5000个引导样本的PROCESS中介模型。结果对专家健康建议的冲突感知是寻求和分享健康信息的社交媒体使用的积极的,边际显著的预测因子(P = .08),这使得人们对政府卫生机构的癌症信息有更高的信任度(P < .05),并且在未来一年内接受癌症筛查测试的意愿更高(P < .01)。结论通过强大的数字健康素养和适当的社交媒体算法,社交媒体可以加强癌症筛查行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflicting and Changing Health Recommendations and Their Influence on Cancer Prevention: Social Media Use and Trust as Positive Mediators.

PurposeThis study examines the mediating roles of social media use and trust in the relationship between experts' health recommendations being conflicting and changing and their intention to receive cancer screening tests using the O1-S-O2-R model.DesignCross-sectional.SettingData were extracted from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 6.SubjectsOf 6252 individuals, 5014 were used in the final analysis. The total weighted sample size is 255,489,241.MeasuresConflicting & Changing Health Recommendations (O1): How often experts' health recommendations seem to conflict and change. Social Media Use (S): The use of social media to seek and share health information. Trust in Cancer Information (O2): Trust in cancer information from doctors, government health agencies, and scientists. Interest in Cancer Screening in the next year (R).AnalysisMultiple and logistic regressions were performed with the weighted sample. A PROCESS mediation model with a 5000 bootstrapping sample was also performed.ResultsThe perception of health recommendations from experts conflicting was a positive, marginally significant predictor of social media use for seeking and sharing health information (P = .08), which generated higher trust in cancer information from government health agencies (P < .05) and higher intention to receive cancer screening tests within the next year (P < .01).ConclusionsWith strong digital health literacy and appropriate social media algorithms, social media could reinforce cancer screening behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信