半球形头状体空化流的reynolds平均Navier-Stokes模型与部分平均Navier-Stokes模型的比较研究

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Junyoung Park , Woochan Seok
{"title":"半球形头状体空化流的reynolds平均Navier-Stokes模型与部分平均Navier-Stokes模型的比较研究","authors":"Junyoung Park ,&nbsp;Woochan Seok","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2025.204265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cavitation causes the erosion of marine propellers and induces noise and vibration within the mechanical system. In this study, the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and partially-averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) models for detecting cavitation flows around a three-dimensional (3D) hemispherical head-form body were compared. These turbulence models can accurately depict the unsteady characteristics of cavitation flows. To investigate the effect of these turbulence models on flow characteristics, we analyzed the periodic shedding of the sheet and cloud cavitation. In addition to the shape of the cavity around the body, the pressure, velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent viscosity were compared to identify the differences between the turbulent models. An open-source platform OpenFOAM was used for this analysis. The results revealed that the pressure coefficient in the PANS model was consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, the PANS model provided an accurate depiction of the development process of sheet and cloud cavitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11985,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 204265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and partially-averaged Navier–Stokes models for cavitation flows around a hemispherical head-form body\",\"authors\":\"Junyoung Park ,&nbsp;Woochan Seok\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2025.204265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cavitation causes the erosion of marine propellers and induces noise and vibration within the mechanical system. In this study, the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and partially-averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) models for detecting cavitation flows around a three-dimensional (3D) hemispherical head-form body were compared. These turbulence models can accurately depict the unsteady characteristics of cavitation flows. To investigate the effect of these turbulence models on flow characteristics, we analyzed the periodic shedding of the sheet and cloud cavitation. In addition to the shape of the cavity around the body, the pressure, velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent viscosity were compared to identify the differences between the turbulent models. An open-source platform OpenFOAM was used for this analysis. The results revealed that the pressure coefficient in the PANS model was consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, the PANS model provided an accurate depiction of the development process of sheet and cloud cavitation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 204265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754625000391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754625000391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空化会对船舶螺旋桨造成侵蚀,并在机械系统中引起噪声和振动。在这项研究中,比较了reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (RANS)和部分平均Navier-Stokes (PANS)模型在三维(3D)半球形头部形状身体周围的空化流检测结果。这些湍流模型能够准确地描述空化流动的非定常特性。为了研究这些湍流模型对流动特性的影响,我们分析了薄片的周期性脱落和云的空化。除了体周围空腔的形状外,还比较了压力、速度、湍流动能和湍流粘度,以确定湍流模型之间的差异。该分析使用了开源平台OpenFOAM。结果表明,PANS模型的压力系数与实验数据吻合较好。此外,PANS模型提供了准确的描述板和云空化的发展过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and partially-averaged Navier–Stokes models for cavitation flows around a hemispherical head-form body
Cavitation causes the erosion of marine propellers and induces noise and vibration within the mechanical system. In this study, the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and partially-averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) models for detecting cavitation flows around a three-dimensional (3D) hemispherical head-form body were compared. These turbulence models can accurately depict the unsteady characteristics of cavitation flows. To investigate the effect of these turbulence models on flow characteristics, we analyzed the periodic shedding of the sheet and cloud cavitation. In addition to the shape of the cavity around the body, the pressure, velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent viscosity were compared to identify the differences between the turbulent models. An open-source platform OpenFOAM was used for this analysis. The results revealed that the pressure coefficient in the PANS model was consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, the PANS model provided an accurate depiction of the development process of sheet and cloud cavitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
127
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids publishes papers in all fields of fluid mechanics. Although investigations in well-established areas are within the scope of the journal, recent developments and innovative ideas are particularly welcome. Theoretical, computational and experimental papers are equally welcome. Mathematical methods, be they deterministic or stochastic, analytical or numerical, will be accepted provided they serve to clarify some identifiable problems in fluid mechanics, and provided the significance of results is explained. Similarly, experimental papers must add physical insight in to the understanding of fluid mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信