Catriana R. Thorne, Colin Shaughnessy, Lindsay Adelson MD, David Cannata, Emily Orosco, Katie Rong MD, Regina Kostyun PhD, Meghan Kelly Herbst MD
{"title":"一项全国范围内学术与非学术普通急诊科即时超声使用的调查","authors":"Catriana R. Thorne, Colin Shaughnessy, Lindsay Adelson MD, David Cannata, Emily Orosco, Katie Rong MD, Regina Kostyun PhD, Meghan Kelly Herbst MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Despite mandatory point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training in residency, utilization varies across emergency departments (EDs). We sought to characterize PoCUS utilization patterns in the United States, specifically comparing academic to nonacademic settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to November 2024, targeting general EDs open 24/7. Site directors completed a 15-question survey on PoCUS use, workflow, and billing. Academic EDs (those with emergency medicine residents or ultrasound fellows) were compared to nonacademic EDs. Regular PoCUS use for a physician was defined as using two or more applications at least once per week; regular PoCUS use for an application was defined as at least one scan per week. A strong workflow required image storage to Picture Archiving and Communication System/Middleware and physician review. Differences in PoCUS utilization, workflow, and billing were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, and unpaired <i>t</i>-tests. Correlations between study variables and ED academic status were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients. Odds ratios (ORs) measured the strength of associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 664 invited EDs (15.3% of all U.S. EDs), 423 completed surveys (63.8% response rate) from all 50 states and Washington, DC. Academic EDs (<i>n</i> = 220) were more likely to own four or more ultrasound machines (54.1%) compared to nonacademic EDs (54.2% owned ≤1, <i>p</i> < 0.001). More physicians performed ultrasound regularly at academic sites (58.7% ± 28.1%) versus nonacademic sites (46.7% ± 27.2%, p < 0.001), but there was no association between recent residency training and ultrasound utilization (<i>r</i> = −0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.875). Academic EDs had stronger workflow integration (OR 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–5.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and were more likely to bill for PoCUS (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PoCUS utilization is lower in nonacademic EDs, with suboptimal workflows and fewer billing practices. Addressing these disparities may enhance PoCUS implementation and improve patient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nationwide survey of point-of-care ultrasound utilization in academic versus nonacademic general emergency departments\",\"authors\":\"Catriana R. Thorne, Colin Shaughnessy, Lindsay Adelson MD, David Cannata, Emily Orosco, Katie Rong MD, Regina Kostyun PhD, Meghan Kelly Herbst MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite mandatory point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training in residency, utilization varies across emergency departments (EDs). We sought to characterize PoCUS utilization patterns in the United States, specifically comparing academic to nonacademic settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to November 2024, targeting general EDs open 24/7. Site directors completed a 15-question survey on PoCUS use, workflow, and billing. Academic EDs (those with emergency medicine residents or ultrasound fellows) were compared to nonacademic EDs. Regular PoCUS use for a physician was defined as using two or more applications at least once per week; regular PoCUS use for an application was defined as at least one scan per week. A strong workflow required image storage to Picture Archiving and Communication System/Middleware and physician review. Differences in PoCUS utilization, workflow, and billing were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, and unpaired <i>t</i>-tests. Correlations between study variables and ED academic status were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients. Odds ratios (ORs) measured the strength of associations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 664 invited EDs (15.3% of all U.S. EDs), 423 completed surveys (63.8% response rate) from all 50 states and Washington, DC. Academic EDs (<i>n</i> = 220) were more likely to own four or more ultrasound machines (54.1%) compared to nonacademic EDs (54.2% owned ≤1, <i>p</i> < 0.001). More physicians performed ultrasound regularly at academic sites (58.7% ± 28.1%) versus nonacademic sites (46.7% ± 27.2%, p < 0.001), but there was no association between recent residency training and ultrasound utilization (<i>r</i> = −0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.875). Academic EDs had stronger workflow integration (OR 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–5.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and were more likely to bill for PoCUS (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>PoCUS utilization is lower in nonacademic EDs, with suboptimal workflows and fewer billing practices. Addressing these disparities may enhance PoCUS implementation and improve patient care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A nationwide survey of point-of-care ultrasound utilization in academic versus nonacademic general emergency departments
Objective
Despite mandatory point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training in residency, utilization varies across emergency departments (EDs). We sought to characterize PoCUS utilization patterns in the United States, specifically comparing academic to nonacademic settings.
Methods
A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to November 2024, targeting general EDs open 24/7. Site directors completed a 15-question survey on PoCUS use, workflow, and billing. Academic EDs (those with emergency medicine residents or ultrasound fellows) were compared to nonacademic EDs. Regular PoCUS use for a physician was defined as using two or more applications at least once per week; regular PoCUS use for an application was defined as at least one scan per week. A strong workflow required image storage to Picture Archiving and Communication System/Middleware and physician review. Differences in PoCUS utilization, workflow, and billing were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and unpaired t-tests. Correlations between study variables and ED academic status were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients. Odds ratios (ORs) measured the strength of associations.
Results
Of 664 invited EDs (15.3% of all U.S. EDs), 423 completed surveys (63.8% response rate) from all 50 states and Washington, DC. Academic EDs (n = 220) were more likely to own four or more ultrasound machines (54.1%) compared to nonacademic EDs (54.2% owned ≤1, p < 0.001). More physicians performed ultrasound regularly at academic sites (58.7% ± 28.1%) versus nonacademic sites (46.7% ± 27.2%, p < 0.001), but there was no association between recent residency training and ultrasound utilization (r = −0.008, p = 0.875). Academic EDs had stronger workflow integration (OR 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–5.9, p < 0.001) and were more likely to bill for PoCUS (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.0, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
PoCUS utilization is lower in nonacademic EDs, with suboptimal workflows and fewer billing practices. Addressing these disparities may enhance PoCUS implementation and improve patient care.