一项全国范围内学术与非学术普通急诊科即时超声使用的调查

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Catriana R. Thorne, Colin Shaughnessy, Lindsay Adelson MD, David Cannata, Emily Orosco, Katie Rong MD, Regina Kostyun PhD, Meghan Kelly Herbst MD
{"title":"一项全国范围内学术与非学术普通急诊科即时超声使用的调查","authors":"Catriana R. Thorne,&nbsp;Colin Shaughnessy,&nbsp;Lindsay Adelson MD,&nbsp;David Cannata,&nbsp;Emily Orosco,&nbsp;Katie Rong MD,&nbsp;Regina Kostyun PhD,&nbsp;Meghan Kelly Herbst MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Despite mandatory point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training in residency, utilization varies across emergency departments (EDs). We sought to characterize PoCUS utilization patterns in the United States, specifically comparing academic to nonacademic settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to November 2024, targeting general EDs open 24/7. Site directors completed a 15-question survey on PoCUS use, workflow, and billing. Academic EDs (those with emergency medicine residents or ultrasound fellows) were compared to nonacademic EDs. Regular PoCUS use for a physician was defined as using two or more applications at least once per week; regular PoCUS use for an application was defined as at least one scan per week. A strong workflow required image storage to Picture Archiving and Communication System/Middleware and physician review. Differences in PoCUS utilization, workflow, and billing were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, and unpaired <i>t</i>-tests. Correlations between study variables and ED academic status were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients. Odds ratios (ORs) measured the strength of associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 664 invited EDs (15.3% of all U.S. EDs), 423 completed surveys (63.8% response rate) from all 50 states and Washington, DC. Academic EDs (<i>n</i> = 220) were more likely to own four or more ultrasound machines (54.1%) compared to nonacademic EDs (54.2% owned ≤1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). More physicians performed ultrasound regularly at academic sites (58.7% ± 28.1%) versus nonacademic sites (46.7% ± 27.2%, p &lt; 0.001), but there was no association between recent residency training and ultrasound utilization (<i>r</i> = −0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.875). Academic EDs had stronger workflow integration (OR 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–5.9, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and were more likely to bill for PoCUS (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.0, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PoCUS utilization is lower in nonacademic EDs, with suboptimal workflows and fewer billing practices. Addressing these disparities may enhance PoCUS implementation and improve patient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nationwide survey of point-of-care ultrasound utilization in academic versus nonacademic general emergency departments\",\"authors\":\"Catriana R. Thorne,&nbsp;Colin Shaughnessy,&nbsp;Lindsay Adelson MD,&nbsp;David Cannata,&nbsp;Emily Orosco,&nbsp;Katie Rong MD,&nbsp;Regina Kostyun PhD,&nbsp;Meghan Kelly Herbst MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite mandatory point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training in residency, utilization varies across emergency departments (EDs). We sought to characterize PoCUS utilization patterns in the United States, specifically comparing academic to nonacademic settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to November 2024, targeting general EDs open 24/7. Site directors completed a 15-question survey on PoCUS use, workflow, and billing. Academic EDs (those with emergency medicine residents or ultrasound fellows) were compared to nonacademic EDs. Regular PoCUS use for a physician was defined as using two or more applications at least once per week; regular PoCUS use for an application was defined as at least one scan per week. A strong workflow required image storage to Picture Archiving and Communication System/Middleware and physician review. Differences in PoCUS utilization, workflow, and billing were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>, and unpaired <i>t</i>-tests. Correlations between study variables and ED academic status were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients. Odds ratios (ORs) measured the strength of associations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 664 invited EDs (15.3% of all U.S. EDs), 423 completed surveys (63.8% response rate) from all 50 states and Washington, DC. Academic EDs (<i>n</i> = 220) were more likely to own four or more ultrasound machines (54.1%) compared to nonacademic EDs (54.2% owned ≤1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). More physicians performed ultrasound regularly at academic sites (58.7% ± 28.1%) versus nonacademic sites (46.7% ± 27.2%, p &lt; 0.001), but there was no association between recent residency training and ultrasound utilization (<i>r</i> = −0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.875). Academic EDs had stronger workflow integration (OR 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–5.9, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and were more likely to bill for PoCUS (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.0, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>PoCUS utilization is lower in nonacademic EDs, with suboptimal workflows and fewer billing practices. Addressing these disparities may enhance PoCUS implementation and improve patient care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管住院医师对超声(PoCUS)进行了强制性培训,但急诊部门(ed)对其的使用情况各不相同。我们试图描述PoCUS在美国的使用模式,特别是比较学术和非学术环境。方法于2024年3月至11月,在全国范围内对24小时开放的普通急诊科进行横断面调查。站点主管完成了一项关于PoCUS使用、工作流程和计费的15个问题的调查。学术性急诊科(急诊住院医师或超声研究员)与非学术性急诊科进行比较。医师的常规PoCUS使用定义为每周至少使用两次或两次以上;应用程序的常规PoCUS使用定义为每周至少一次扫描。一个强大的工作流需要图像存储到图像存档和通信系统/中间件和医生审查。使用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和非配对t检验分析PoCUS利用率、工作流程和计费的差异。使用Pearson和Spearman系数评估研究变量与ED学术地位之间的相关性。优势比(ORs)测量了关联的强度。结果在664位受邀的EDs(占美国所有EDs的15.3%)中,来自50个州和华盛顿特区的423位完成了调查(63.8%的回复率)。与非学术急诊科(54.2%拥有≤1台,p < 0.001)相比,学术急诊科(n = 220)更有可能拥有4台或更多超声仪(54.1%)。与非学术机构(46.7%±27.2%,p < 0.001)相比,更多的医生定期在学术机构(58.7%±28.1%)进行超声检查,但近期住院医师培训与超声使用之间没有关联(r = - 0.008, p = 0.875)。学术部门的EDs具有更强的工作流程整合(OR为3.9,95%可信区间[CI] 2.6-5.9, p < 0.001),并且更有可能为PoCUS付费(OR为3.8,95% CI为2.4-6.0,p < 0.001)。结论:非学术性急诊科的PoCUS使用率较低,工作流程不理想,计费实践较少。解决这些差异可能会加强PoCUS的实施并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A nationwide survey of point-of-care ultrasound utilization in academic versus nonacademic general emergency departments

Objective

Despite mandatory point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training in residency, utilization varies across emergency departments (EDs). We sought to characterize PoCUS utilization patterns in the United States, specifically comparing academic to nonacademic settings.

Methods

A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to November 2024, targeting general EDs open 24/7. Site directors completed a 15-question survey on PoCUS use, workflow, and billing. Academic EDs (those with emergency medicine residents or ultrasound fellows) were compared to nonacademic EDs. Regular PoCUS use for a physician was defined as using two or more applications at least once per week; regular PoCUS use for an application was defined as at least one scan per week. A strong workflow required image storage to Picture Archiving and Communication System/Middleware and physician review. Differences in PoCUS utilization, workflow, and billing were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and unpaired t-tests. Correlations between study variables and ED academic status were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients. Odds ratios (ORs) measured the strength of associations.

Results

Of 664 invited EDs (15.3% of all U.S. EDs), 423 completed surveys (63.8% response rate) from all 50 states and Washington, DC. Academic EDs (n = 220) were more likely to own four or more ultrasound machines (54.1%) compared to nonacademic EDs (54.2% owned ≤1, p < 0.001). More physicians performed ultrasound regularly at academic sites (58.7% ± 28.1%) versus nonacademic sites (46.7% ± 27.2%, p < 0.001), but there was no association between recent residency training and ultrasound utilization (r = −0.008, p = 0.875). Academic EDs had stronger workflow integration (OR 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–5.9, p < 0.001) and were more likely to bill for PoCUS (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4–6.0, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

PoCUS utilization is lower in nonacademic EDs, with suboptimal workflows and fewer billing practices. Addressing these disparities may enhance PoCUS implementation and improve patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信