Cassandra White, Christine Paul, Esther Liet, Dilshan Kalpage, David Mossman, Andrew Ziolkowski, Stephen Ackland, Rodney J. Scott
{"title":"在澳大利亚实施DPYD基因分型预测化疗毒性:可行性研究","authors":"Cassandra White, Christine Paul, Esther Liet, Dilshan Kalpage, David Mossman, Andrew Ziolkowski, Stephen Ackland, Rodney J. Scott","doi":"10.1111/imj.16576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. <i>DPYD</i> genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3–5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%–40% grade3–4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 <i>DPYD</i> variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G, c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1–30). Grade3–4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p><i>DPYD</i> genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective <i>DPYD</i> genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"55 5","pages":"741-748"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing DPYD genotyping to predict chemotherapy toxicity in Australia: a feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra White, Christine Paul, Esther Liet, Dilshan Kalpage, David Mossman, Andrew Ziolkowski, Stephen Ackland, Rodney J. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.16576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. <i>DPYD</i> genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3–5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%–40% grade3–4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 <i>DPYD</i> variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G, c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1–30). Grade3–4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>DPYD</i> genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective <i>DPYD</i> genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"741-748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16576\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing DPYD genotyping to predict chemotherapy toxicity in Australia: a feasibility study
Background
Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. DPYD genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3–5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%–40% grade3–4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.
Aim
This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 DPYD variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G, c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of DPYD variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.
Methods
Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.
Results
104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1–30). Grade3–4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 DPYD variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.
Conclusion
DPYD genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective DPYD genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.