在澳大利亚实施DPYD基因分型预测化疗毒性:可行性研究

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cassandra White, Christine Paul, Esther Liet, Dilshan Kalpage, David Mossman, Andrew Ziolkowski, Stephen Ackland, Rodney J. Scott
{"title":"在澳大利亚实施DPYD基因分型预测化疗毒性:可行性研究","authors":"Cassandra White,&nbsp;Christine Paul,&nbsp;Esther Liet,&nbsp;Dilshan Kalpage,&nbsp;David Mossman,&nbsp;Andrew Ziolkowski,&nbsp;Stephen Ackland,&nbsp;Rodney J. Scott","doi":"10.1111/imj.16576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. <i>DPYD</i> genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3–5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%–40% grade3–4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 <i>DPYD</i> variants (c.1905+1G&gt;A, c.1679T&gt;G, c.2846A&gt;T and c.1236G&gt;A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1–30). Grade3–4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p><i>DPYD</i> genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective <i>DPYD</i> genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"55 5","pages":"741-748"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing DPYD genotyping to predict chemotherapy toxicity in Australia: a feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra White,&nbsp;Christine Paul,&nbsp;Esther Liet,&nbsp;Dilshan Kalpage,&nbsp;David Mossman,&nbsp;Andrew Ziolkowski,&nbsp;Stephen Ackland,&nbsp;Rodney J. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.16576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. <i>DPYD</i> genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3–5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%–40% grade3–4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 <i>DPYD</i> variants (c.1905+1G&gt;A, c.1679T&gt;G, c.2846A&gt;T and c.1236G&gt;A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1–30). Grade3–4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 <i>DPYD</i> variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>DPYD</i> genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective <i>DPYD</i> genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"741-748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16576\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在大量人群中公平有效地实施药物基因组学指导的癌症患者管理面临挑战。DPYD基因分型确定发生3 - 5级氟嘧啶(FP)毒性风险增加的患者的临床显著变异。约16000名澳大利亚人使用FP化疗,其3 - 4级毒性发生率为10%-40%,死亡率为1%。变异携带者可以调整FP剂量,以提高治疗耐受性,同时不影响抗癌效果。这一策略在澳大利亚尚未正式采用,尽管有广泛的国际标准化。目的本初步研究确定了澳大利亚患者4种DPYD变异(c.1905+1G>;A, c.1679T>;G, c.2846A>;T和c.1236G>;A/单倍型B3)的基因分型周转时间(TAT)。次要目标是确定DPYD变异携带者的FP毒性,并分析医疗保健利益相关者的观点,包括实施的推动因素/障碍。方法采用实时聚合酶链反应法进行基因分型。采用半结构化问卷法确定定性数据。结果104例患者在24个月内平均TAT为7.2天,5.2个工作日(范围1-30)。9/16 DPYD变异携带者发生3 - 4级毒性,包括2例ICU入院和1例死亡。30个问卷调查对象的主题表明,临床环境和资源是基本障碍,改善患者护理的动机是变革的主要促成因素。结论DPYD基因分型对提高FP化疗患者的精准肿瘤学是可行的。7天的TAT是利益相关者和国家肿瘤临床医师团体都可以接受的。这项试点研究虽然规模很小,但为澳大利亚评估DPYD基因分型的前景及其对计划生育耐受性、患者安全性和成本效益的影响提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing DPYD genotyping to predict chemotherapy toxicity in Australia: a feasibility study

Background

Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. DPYD genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3–5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%–40% grade3–4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.

Aim

This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 DPYD variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G, c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of DPYD variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.

Methods

Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.

Results

104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1–30). Grade3–4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 DPYD variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.

Conclusion

DPYD genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective DPYD genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信