探索高等教育中大型语言模型的整合:以土木工程学生数学实验室为例

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Nikolaos Matzakos, Maria Moundridou
{"title":"探索高等教育中大型语言模型的整合:以土木工程学生数学实验室为例","authors":"Nikolaos Matzakos,&nbsp;Maria Moundridou","doi":"10.1002/cae.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the integration of large language models (LLMs) alongside computer algebra systems (CAS) in a mathematics laboratory for civil engineering students, examining their combined impact on problem-solving and inquiry-driven learning. The intervention was designed using the integrate LLMs alongside CAS (ILAC) approach, which structures the inquiry process into key phases, guiding students through exploration, hypothesis testing, and solution validation. Six structured activities were implemented and assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings reveal that LLMs enhanced conceptual understanding, clarified methodologies, and assisted with command syntax, while CAS ensured computational accuracy and result validation. Many students critically cross-verified LLM-generated results with CAS, though some relied solely on LLMs, highlighting the need for better guidance on tool usage. While LLMs fostered engagement, skepticism remained regarding their ability to address deeper mathematical deficiencies. The intervention led to moderate improvements in students' familiarity with AI tools, though its short duration and the use of general-purpose LLMs limited perceived usefulness. To maximize educational benefits, future implementations should consider longer interventions, advanced training in prompt engineering, and tailored AI solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Large Language Models Integration in Higher Education: A Case Study in a Mathematics Laboratory for Civil Engineering Students\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Matzakos,&nbsp;Maria Moundridou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cae.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the integration of large language models (LLMs) alongside computer algebra systems (CAS) in a mathematics laboratory for civil engineering students, examining their combined impact on problem-solving and inquiry-driven learning. The intervention was designed using the integrate LLMs alongside CAS (ILAC) approach, which structures the inquiry process into key phases, guiding students through exploration, hypothesis testing, and solution validation. Six structured activities were implemented and assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings reveal that LLMs enhanced conceptual understanding, clarified methodologies, and assisted with command syntax, while CAS ensured computational accuracy and result validation. Many students critically cross-verified LLM-generated results with CAS, though some relied solely on LLMs, highlighting the need for better guidance on tool usage. While LLMs fostered engagement, skepticism remained regarding their ability to address deeper mathematical deficiencies. The intervention led to moderate improvements in students' familiarity with AI tools, though its short duration and the use of general-purpose LLMs limited perceived usefulness. To maximize educational benefits, future implementations should consider longer interventions, advanced training in prompt engineering, and tailored AI solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.70049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了大型语言模型(llm)与计算机代数系统(CAS)在土木工程学生数学实验室中的集成,研究了它们对问题解决和探究驱动学习的综合影响。干预的设计采用了整合的法学硕士与CAS (ILAC)方法,该方法将探究过程划分为关键阶段,指导学生进行探索、假设检验和解决方案验证。采用定量和定性方法实施和评估了六项结构化活动。研究结果表明,llm增强了概念理解,澄清了方法,并协助命令语法,而CAS确保了计算准确性和结果验证。许多学生批判性地与CAS交叉验证了llm生成的结果,尽管有些学生仅依赖于llm,这突出了在工具使用方面需要更好的指导。虽然法学硕士培养了参与,但人们仍然怀疑他们解决更深层次数学缺陷的能力。干预导致学生对人工智能工具的熟悉程度适度提高,尽管其持续时间短,使用通用法学硕士限制了感知的有用性。为了最大限度地提高教育效益,未来的实施应考虑更长的干预措施、快速工程方面的高级培训以及量身定制的人工智能解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Large Language Models Integration in Higher Education: A Case Study in a Mathematics Laboratory for Civil Engineering Students

Exploring Large Language Models Integration in Higher Education: A Case Study in a Mathematics Laboratory for Civil Engineering Students

This study investigates the integration of large language models (LLMs) alongside computer algebra systems (CAS) in a mathematics laboratory for civil engineering students, examining their combined impact on problem-solving and inquiry-driven learning. The intervention was designed using the integrate LLMs alongside CAS (ILAC) approach, which structures the inquiry process into key phases, guiding students through exploration, hypothesis testing, and solution validation. Six structured activities were implemented and assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings reveal that LLMs enhanced conceptual understanding, clarified methodologies, and assisted with command syntax, while CAS ensured computational accuracy and result validation. Many students critically cross-verified LLM-generated results with CAS, though some relied solely on LLMs, highlighting the need for better guidance on tool usage. While LLMs fostered engagement, skepticism remained regarding their ability to address deeper mathematical deficiencies. The intervention led to moderate improvements in students' familiarity with AI tools, though its short duration and the use of general-purpose LLMs limited perceived usefulness. To maximize educational benefits, future implementations should consider longer interventions, advanced training in prompt engineering, and tailored AI solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信