综合考虑流动性转型的社会和生态层面:面临贫困风险的人使用可持续运输系统的障碍

IF 6.1 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Franziska Henkel, Alena Fischer, Carsten Sommer
{"title":"综合考虑流动性转型的社会和生态层面:面临贫困风险的人使用可持续运输系统的障碍","authors":"Franziska Henkel,&nbsp;Alena Fischer,&nbsp;Carsten Sommer","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the mobility transition is to significantly transform the transport system from both an ecological and a social point of view and thus to make it ecologically and socially just. Everyone and especially vulnerable groups, such as people on low incomes, should benefit from the mobility transition. Despite very limited financial resources, people often finance a private car and save money in other relevant areas of their life, such as food. Switching to cost-effective sustainable transport systems would therefore have a high individual benefit for people at risk of poverty in addition to the social benefit. Two quantitative surveys with achieved sample sizes of 1031 participants and 420 participants were conducted in the Hanover Region in order to analyse the barriers to using sustainable transport systems by people at risk of poverty. The key results show that these barriers differ greatly between different groups of people and different types of households. The barriers to using public transport are significantly higher in households with children at risk of poverty than in other households at risk of poverty. The attitude of people at risk of poverty towards public transport is worse than towards driving, cycling and walking. This is why public transport is not their preferred means of transport. Regarding the use of bicycles, the main barriers for people at risk of poverty are skills and resources rather than their attitude towards cycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated consideration of the social and ecological dimension of the mobility transition: barriers to using sustainable transport systems by people at risk of poverty\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Henkel,&nbsp;Alena Fischer,&nbsp;Carsten Sommer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The aim of the mobility transition is to significantly transform the transport system from both an ecological and a social point of view and thus to make it ecologically and socially just. Everyone and especially vulnerable groups, such as people on low incomes, should benefit from the mobility transition. Despite very limited financial resources, people often finance a private car and save money in other relevant areas of their life, such as food. Switching to cost-effective sustainable transport systems would therefore have a high individual benefit for people at risk of poverty in addition to the social benefit. Two quantitative surveys with achieved sample sizes of 1031 participants and 420 participants were conducted in the Hanover Region in order to analyse the barriers to using sustainable transport systems by people at risk of poverty. The key results show that these barriers differ greatly between different groups of people and different types of households. The barriers to using public transport are significantly higher in households with children at risk of poverty than in other households at risk of poverty. The attitude of people at risk of poverty towards public transport is worse than towards driving, cycling and walking. This is why public transport is not their preferred means of transport. Regarding the use of bicycles, the main barriers for people at risk of poverty are skills and resources rather than their attitude towards cycling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通转型的目的是从生态和社会的角度显著改变交通系统,从而使其在生态和社会上都是公正的。每个人,尤其是弱势群体,如低收入人群,都应该从流动性转变中受益。尽管经济资源非常有限,但人们经常购买私家车,并在生活的其他相关领域省钱,比如食物。因此,转向具有成本效益的可持续运输系统,除了社会效益外,对面临贫困风险的人有很高的个人效益。在汉诺威地区进行了两项定量调查,分别为1031名参与者和420名参与者,以分析面临贫困风险的人使用可持续运输系统的障碍。关键结果表明,这些障碍在不同的人群和不同类型的家庭之间差异很大。在有儿童面临贫困风险的家庭中,使用公共交通工具的障碍明显高于其他面临贫困风险的家庭。面临贫困风险的人对公共交通的态度比开车、骑自行车和步行更糟糕。这就是为什么公共交通不是他们首选的交通工具。关于自行车的使用,贫困风险人群的主要障碍是技能和资源,而不是他们对自行车的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated consideration of the social and ecological dimension of the mobility transition: barriers to using sustainable transport systems by people at risk of poverty
The aim of the mobility transition is to significantly transform the transport system from both an ecological and a social point of view and thus to make it ecologically and socially just. Everyone and especially vulnerable groups, such as people on low incomes, should benefit from the mobility transition. Despite very limited financial resources, people often finance a private car and save money in other relevant areas of their life, such as food. Switching to cost-effective sustainable transport systems would therefore have a high individual benefit for people at risk of poverty in addition to the social benefit. Two quantitative surveys with achieved sample sizes of 1031 participants and 420 participants were conducted in the Hanover Region in order to analyse the barriers to using sustainable transport systems by people at risk of poverty. The key results show that these barriers differ greatly between different groups of people and different types of households. The barriers to using public transport are significantly higher in households with children at risk of poverty than in other households at risk of poverty. The attitude of people at risk of poverty towards public transport is worse than towards driving, cycling and walking. This is why public transport is not their preferred means of transport. Regarding the use of bicycles, the main barriers for people at risk of poverty are skills and resources rather than their attitude towards cycling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信