护生短期烟草干预培训后述职的有效性:一项随机临床试验

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo , César Leal-Costa , María Suárez-Cortés , Alonso Molina-Rodríguez , María Ruzafa-Martínez
{"title":"护生短期烟草干预培训后述职的有效性:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo ,&nbsp;César Leal-Costa ,&nbsp;María Suárez-Cortés ,&nbsp;Alonso Molina-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;María Ruzafa-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the effectiveness of debriefing after the objective assessment of brief tobacco interventions (BTI) training and its changes after 3 and 9 months.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Controlled clinical trial with random assignment by blocks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>145 sec-year students enrolled in a 4-year nursing degree program participated in the study, with 80 in the intervention group and 65 in the control group. Training according to the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) and 5Rs (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks and Repetition) model was provided to both the control and experimental groups as a brief tobacco intervention strategy in primary care. Presentation of three clinical scenarios through videotaped objective structured clinical examination (VOSCE) and assessment with the BTI-St© tool. Posterior debriefing with the experimental group. Descriptive statistical analyses, 2-factor repeated measures ANOVA. Each subject was measured 5 times. (ID protocol: NCT06564766)</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The time*group interaction results demonstrated significant differences with large effect sizes across all three scenarios. In the experimental groups, the most notable differences were observed immediately after the debriefing compared with baseline. Although these differences decreased over time, they remained present at 3 and 9 months in all scenarios relative to the baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The inclusion of debriefing in a brief intervention for learning about BTI within the context of primary care of nursing students resulted in a significant increase in their learning and greater durability, at least after nine months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 104393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of debriefing after a short training on brief tobacco intervention for nursing students: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo ,&nbsp;César Leal-Costa ,&nbsp;María Suárez-Cortés ,&nbsp;Alonso Molina-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;María Ruzafa-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the effectiveness of debriefing after the objective assessment of brief tobacco interventions (BTI) training and its changes after 3 and 9 months.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Controlled clinical trial with random assignment by blocks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>145 sec-year students enrolled in a 4-year nursing degree program participated in the study, with 80 in the intervention group and 65 in the control group. Training according to the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) and 5Rs (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks and Repetition) model was provided to both the control and experimental groups as a brief tobacco intervention strategy in primary care. Presentation of three clinical scenarios through videotaped objective structured clinical examination (VOSCE) and assessment with the BTI-St© tool. Posterior debriefing with the experimental group. Descriptive statistical analyses, 2-factor repeated measures ANOVA. Each subject was measured 5 times. (ID protocol: NCT06564766)</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The time*group interaction results demonstrated significant differences with large effect sizes across all three scenarios. In the experimental groups, the most notable differences were observed immediately after the debriefing compared with baseline. Although these differences decreased over time, they remained present at 3 and 9 months in all scenarios relative to the baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The inclusion of debriefing in a brief intervention for learning about BTI within the context of primary care of nursing students resulted in a significant increase in their learning and greater durability, at least after nine months.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325001490\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325001490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨短期烟草干预(BTI)培训客观评估后述职汇报的有效性及其在3个月和9个月后的变化。设计对照临床试验,随机分组。方法145名 四年制护理专业大二学生参与研究,其中干预组80人,对照组65人。根据5As(询问、建议、评估、协助和安排)和5Rs(相关性、风险、奖励、障碍和重复)模型对对照组和实验组进行培训,作为初级保健中的简短烟草干预策略。通过录像客观结构化临床检查(VOSCE)和BTI-St©工具评估三种临床情景。实验组的后向述情。描述性统计分析,双因素重复测量方差分析。每位受试者测量5次。(ID协议:NCT06564766)结果时间*组交互结果在所有三种情况下均显示出显著差异,且效应量较大。在实验组中,与基线相比,最显著的差异是在汇报后立即观察到的。尽管这些差异随着时间的推移而减少,但相对于基线,在所有情况下,它们在3个月和9个月时仍然存在。结论在初级护理的背景下,在一个简短的干预中纳入述职,可以显著提高护生的学习能力和持久性,至少在9个月后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of debriefing after a short training on brief tobacco intervention for nursing students: A randomized clinical trial

Aim

To determine the effectiveness of debriefing after the objective assessment of brief tobacco interventions (BTI) training and its changes after 3 and 9 months.

Design

Controlled clinical trial with random assignment by blocks.

Methods

145 sec-year students enrolled in a 4-year nursing degree program participated in the study, with 80 in the intervention group and 65 in the control group. Training according to the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) and 5Rs (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks and Repetition) model was provided to both the control and experimental groups as a brief tobacco intervention strategy in primary care. Presentation of three clinical scenarios through videotaped objective structured clinical examination (VOSCE) and assessment with the BTI-St© tool. Posterior debriefing with the experimental group. Descriptive statistical analyses, 2-factor repeated measures ANOVA. Each subject was measured 5 times. (ID protocol: NCT06564766)

Results

The time*group interaction results demonstrated significant differences with large effect sizes across all three scenarios. In the experimental groups, the most notable differences were observed immediately after the debriefing compared with baseline. Although these differences decreased over time, they remained present at 3 and 9 months in all scenarios relative to the baseline.

Conclusions

The inclusion of debriefing in a brief intervention for learning about BTI within the context of primary care of nursing students resulted in a significant increase in their learning and greater durability, at least after nine months.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信