部分性别配额:台湾立法机关和内阁中女性代表的差异

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Chiu-Wan Liu , Anne Fan An Chen , Po-Han Lee
{"title":"部分性别配额:台湾立法机关和内阁中女性代表的差异","authors":"Chiu-Wan Liu ,&nbsp;Anne Fan An Chen ,&nbsp;Po-Han Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the disparity between women's representation in Taiwan's presidential cabinet and its legislature. Under Taiwan's first female president, the legislative elections of 2020 resulted in a legislature of over 40 % female, while the proportion of female cabinet ministers remained consistently low. The paper uses document and text analysis to propose a conceptual framework of ‘partial gender quotas’ to explore this disparity, offering three possible explanations. First, the institutional design of gender quotas for female legislators promotes gender equality in parliamentary representation, while the cabinet is more directly shaped by party politics with less civil oversight. Second, the Executive Yuan's Gender Equality Committee has not realised feminist scholars' expectations to generate a more significant impact on Taiwan's political landscape. Third, Taiwan's female political leadership has shown reluctance to frame themselves as role models for women and girls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial gender quotas: The disparity in women's representation in Taiwan's legislature and cabinet\",\"authors\":\"Chiu-Wan Liu ,&nbsp;Anne Fan An Chen ,&nbsp;Po-Han Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study addresses the disparity between women's representation in Taiwan's presidential cabinet and its legislature. Under Taiwan's first female president, the legislative elections of 2020 resulted in a legislature of over 40 % female, while the proportion of female cabinet ministers remained consistently low. The paper uses document and text analysis to propose a conceptual framework of ‘partial gender quotas’ to explore this disparity, offering three possible explanations. First, the institutional design of gender quotas for female legislators promotes gender equality in parliamentary representation, while the cabinet is more directly shaped by party politics with less civil oversight. Second, the Executive Yuan's Gender Equality Committee has not realised feminist scholars' expectations to generate a more significant impact on Taiwan's political landscape. Third, Taiwan's female political leadership has shown reluctance to frame themselves as role models for women and girls.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000664\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

​​本文利用文献和文本分析提出了一个“部分性别配额”的概念框架来探讨这种差异,并提供了三种可能的解释。首先,女性立法者性别配额的制度设计促进了议会代表中的性别平等,而内阁则更直接地受到政党政治的影响,民间监督较少。其次,行政院性别平等委员会未能实现女权学者对台湾政治格局产生更大影响的期望。第三,台湾的女性政治领导人表现出不愿将自己塑造成妇女和女孩的榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partial gender quotas: The disparity in women's representation in Taiwan's legislature and cabinet
This study addresses the disparity between women's representation in Taiwan's presidential cabinet and its legislature. Under Taiwan's first female president, the legislative elections of 2020 resulted in a legislature of over 40 % female, while the proportion of female cabinet ministers remained consistently low. The paper uses document and text analysis to propose a conceptual framework of ‘partial gender quotas’ to explore this disparity, offering three possible explanations. First, the institutional design of gender quotas for female legislators promotes gender equality in parliamentary representation, while the cabinet is more directly shaped by party politics with less civil oversight. Second, the Executive Yuan's Gender Equality Committee has not realised feminist scholars' expectations to generate a more significant impact on Taiwan's political landscape. Third, Taiwan's female political leadership has shown reluctance to frame themselves as role models for women and girls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信