影响日本BRCA1或BRCA2致病种系变异患者级联检测实施的因素

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Yoshimi Kiyozumi, Seiichiro Nishimura, Nobuhiro Kado, Satomi Higashigawa, Yasue Horiuchi, Eiko Ishihara, Rina Harada, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
{"title":"影响日本BRCA1或BRCA2致病种系变异患者级联检测实施的因素","authors":"Yoshimi Kiyozumi,&nbsp;Seiichiro Nishimura,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Kado,&nbsp;Satomi Higashigawa,&nbsp;Yasue Horiuchi,&nbsp;Eiko Ishihara,&nbsp;Rina Harada,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Matsubayashi","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In clinical management for hereditary cancer patients, risk assessment is needed not only for patients but also for their blood relatives. In people with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC), benefits are demonstrated by identifying relatives with <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> pathogenic germline variants (PGV) and implementing clinical surveillance and risk-reduction surgeries for the at-risk organs. To date, the uptake of cascade testing has been reported to be insufficient, but only a limited number of studies have analyzed the barriers to cascade testing. The current study aimed to analyze the uptake of cascade testing in the relatives of Japanese HBOC probands and clarify the factors that promote cascade testing uptake. This retrospective study included 125 probands carrying <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> PGV and 425 of their first-degree relatives (FDRs). Individual clinicodemographic data were collected from medical records, and comparisons were made between those who did and did not undergo cascade testing. Ninety-two (21.6%) FDRs of HBOC probands underwent cascade testing. Approximately 70% of the relatives underwent testing within 6 months of the proband's genetic testing. Independent predictors of cascade testing of 425 FDRs were: being present at the proband's genetic counseling session [odds ratio (OR): 8.3, 95% CI 4.2–16.1], cost-free testing (OR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.2), being the child of a proband (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.2), and female sex (OR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0–3.0). The cascade testing uptake rate of FDRs in this study was similar to or lower than other countries. cascade testing uptake can be improved in HBOC families by encouraging relatives (children, siblings, and parents) to attend genetic counseling with the proband. Further prospective studies are needed to pursue the reasons for accepting cascade testing, including an evaluation of intrafamily communication processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting the implementation of cascade testing of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Yoshimi Kiyozumi,&nbsp;Seiichiro Nishimura,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Kado,&nbsp;Satomi Higashigawa,&nbsp;Yasue Horiuchi,&nbsp;Eiko Ishihara,&nbsp;Rina Harada,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Matsubayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In clinical management for hereditary cancer patients, risk assessment is needed not only for patients but also for their blood relatives. In people with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC), benefits are demonstrated by identifying relatives with <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> pathogenic germline variants (PGV) and implementing clinical surveillance and risk-reduction surgeries for the at-risk organs. To date, the uptake of cascade testing has been reported to be insufficient, but only a limited number of studies have analyzed the barriers to cascade testing. The current study aimed to analyze the uptake of cascade testing in the relatives of Japanese HBOC probands and clarify the factors that promote cascade testing uptake. This retrospective study included 125 probands carrying <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> PGV and 425 of their first-degree relatives (FDRs). Individual clinicodemographic data were collected from medical records, and comparisons were made between those who did and did not undergo cascade testing. Ninety-two (21.6%) FDRs of HBOC probands underwent cascade testing. Approximately 70% of the relatives underwent testing within 6 months of the proband's genetic testing. Independent predictors of cascade testing of 425 FDRs were: being present at the proband's genetic counseling session [odds ratio (OR): 8.3, 95% CI 4.2–16.1], cost-free testing (OR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.2), being the child of a proband (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.2), and female sex (OR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0–3.0). The cascade testing uptake rate of FDRs in this study was similar to or lower than other countries. cascade testing uptake can be improved in HBOC families by encouraging relatives (children, siblings, and parents) to attend genetic counseling with the proband. Further prospective studies are needed to pursue the reasons for accepting cascade testing, including an evaluation of intrafamily communication processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70055\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在遗传性癌症患者的临床管理中,不仅需要对患者进行风险评估,也需要对其血亲进行风险评估。在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征(HBOC)患者中,通过识别具有BRCA1和BRCA2致病种系变异(PGV)的亲属并实施临床监测和高危器官的风险降低手术,证明了益处。迄今为止,据报道,对级联测试的吸收不足,但只有有限数量的研究分析了级联测试的障碍。本研究旨在分析日本HBOC先证者亲属对级联检测的接受情况,并阐明促进级联检测接受的因素。这项回顾性研究包括125名携带BRCA1或BRCA2 PGV的先证者和425名他们的一级亲属(fdr)。从医疗记录中收集个人临床人口学数据,并对进行级联试验和未进行级联试验的患者进行比较。92例(21.6%)HBOC先证者的fdr进行了级联检测。大约70%的亲属在先证者的基因检测后6个月内接受了检测。425例fdr级联检测的独立预测因子为:参加先证者的遗传咨询会议[比值比(OR): 8.3, 95% CI 4.2-16.1]、免费检测(OR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2)、是先证者的孩子(OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2)和女性(OR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.0)。本研究fdr的级联检测吸收率与其他国家相近或较低。通过鼓励亲属(子女、兄弟姐妹和父母)参加先证者的遗传咨询,可以提高HBOC家庭中级联检测的接受程度。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来寻求接受级联测试的原因,包括对家庭内部沟通过程的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors affecting the implementation of cascade testing of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants in Japan

Factors affecting the implementation of cascade testing of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants in Japan

In clinical management for hereditary cancer patients, risk assessment is needed not only for patients but also for their blood relatives. In people with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC), benefits are demonstrated by identifying relatives with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants (PGV) and implementing clinical surveillance and risk-reduction surgeries for the at-risk organs. To date, the uptake of cascade testing has been reported to be insufficient, but only a limited number of studies have analyzed the barriers to cascade testing. The current study aimed to analyze the uptake of cascade testing in the relatives of Japanese HBOC probands and clarify the factors that promote cascade testing uptake. This retrospective study included 125 probands carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 PGV and 425 of their first-degree relatives (FDRs). Individual clinicodemographic data were collected from medical records, and comparisons were made between those who did and did not undergo cascade testing. Ninety-two (21.6%) FDRs of HBOC probands underwent cascade testing. Approximately 70% of the relatives underwent testing within 6 months of the proband's genetic testing. Independent predictors of cascade testing of 425 FDRs were: being present at the proband's genetic counseling session [odds ratio (OR): 8.3, 95% CI 4.2–16.1], cost-free testing (OR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.2), being the child of a proband (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.2), and female sex (OR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0–3.0). The cascade testing uptake rate of FDRs in this study was similar to or lower than other countries. cascade testing uptake can be improved in HBOC families by encouraging relatives (children, siblings, and parents) to attend genetic counseling with the proband. Further prospective studies are needed to pursue the reasons for accepting cascade testing, including an evaluation of intrafamily communication processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信