基于首选语言的不同文化和语言人群的急诊科报告。澳大利亚新南威尔士州的特点和结果

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Michael M. Dinh, Saartje Berendsen Russell, Michele Fiorentino, Radhika Seimon, Kendall Bein
{"title":"基于首选语言的不同文化和语言人群的急诊科报告。澳大利亚新南威尔士州的特点和结果","authors":"Michael M. Dinh,&nbsp;Saartje Berendsen Russell,&nbsp;Michele Fiorentino,&nbsp;Radhika Seimon,&nbsp;Kendall Bein","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore demographic, clinical characteristics and predictors of outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) from various cultural groups using preferred language as a proxy marker of culturally and linguistically diverse populations (CALD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multicentre data linkage analysis from NSW Australia. ED presentations were identified from the Emergency Department Data Collection containing individual person level data linked deterministically across datasets through a unique master linkage key from around 180 recognised public hospitals. The outcome of interest was ED length of stay and 30-day all-cause mortality following ED presentation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 3,029,492 ED presentations were analysed, of which 336,414 (11%) indicated a non-English preferred language. Overall, non-English preferred language groups were associated with longer ED length of stay for both admitted and discharged patients and higher 30-day mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were marked demographic and clinical differences in characteristics across all non-English preferred language groups. After adjusting for these differences across preferred language groups, the Cantonese preferred language group was associated with a small increased risk of 30-day mortality with an adjusted OR: 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05–1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There were substantial differences with respect to age, presentation characteristics and outcomes across patients from major non-English preferred language groups presenting to ED. Such groups should not be analysed as a single CALD group when examining access and outcomes of ED care, and differences in reported outcomes require further exploration. Any differences in outcomes such as mortality need to be interpreted with caution due to unknown and unmeasured confounders.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department Presentations in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations Based on Preferred Language. Characteristics and Outcomes in New South Wales Australia\",\"authors\":\"Michael M. Dinh,&nbsp;Saartje Berendsen Russell,&nbsp;Michele Fiorentino,&nbsp;Radhika Seimon,&nbsp;Kendall Bein\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore demographic, clinical characteristics and predictors of outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) from various cultural groups using preferred language as a proxy marker of culturally and linguistically diverse populations (CALD).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multicentre data linkage analysis from NSW Australia. ED presentations were identified from the Emergency Department Data Collection containing individual person level data linked deterministically across datasets through a unique master linkage key from around 180 recognised public hospitals. The outcome of interest was ED length of stay and 30-day all-cause mortality following ED presentation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 3,029,492 ED presentations were analysed, of which 336,414 (11%) indicated a non-English preferred language. Overall, non-English preferred language groups were associated with longer ED length of stay for both admitted and discharged patients and higher 30-day mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were marked demographic and clinical differences in characteristics across all non-English preferred language groups. After adjusting for these differences across preferred language groups, the Cantonese preferred language group was associated with a small increased risk of 30-day mortality with an adjusted OR: 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05–1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were substantial differences with respect to age, presentation characteristics and outcomes across patients from major non-English preferred language groups presenting to ED. Such groups should not be analysed as a single CALD group when examining access and outcomes of ED care, and differences in reported outcomes require further exploration. Any differences in outcomes such as mortality need to be interpreted with caution due to unknown and unmeasured confounders.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨不同文化群体急诊科(ED)患者的人口学、临床特征和预后预测因素,并将首选语言作为文化和语言多样性人群(CALD)的替代标志。方法对澳大利亚新南威尔士州多中心数据进行联动分析。从急诊科数据收集中识别出ED报告,其中包含个人级别的数据,通过来自大约180家公认的公立医院的唯一主链接密钥在数据集之间确定地链接。我们感兴趣的结果是ED的住院时间和ED出现后30天的全因死亡率。结果共分析了3,029,492例ED报告,其中336,414例(11%)表示非英语首选语言。总体而言,非英语首选组入院和出院患者的ED住院时间较长,30天死亡率较高(1.2% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001)。在所有非英语首选语言组中,有明显的人口统计学和临床特征差异。在调整了首选语言组之间的这些差异后,粤语首选语言组与30天死亡率的小幅增加相关,调整后的OR为1.28 (95% CI: 1.05-1.55, p = 0.01)。结论:主要非英语优先语言组的ED患者在年龄、表现特征和结果方面存在实质性差异。在检查ED护理的可及性和结果时,这些组不应作为单一的CALD组进行分析,报告结果的差异需要进一步探索。由于未知和未测量的混杂因素,需要谨慎解释死亡率等结果的任何差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Department Presentations in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations Based on Preferred Language. Characteristics and Outcomes in New South Wales Australia

Objective

To explore demographic, clinical characteristics and predictors of outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) from various cultural groups using preferred language as a proxy marker of culturally and linguistically diverse populations (CALD).

Methods

Multicentre data linkage analysis from NSW Australia. ED presentations were identified from the Emergency Department Data Collection containing individual person level data linked deterministically across datasets through a unique master linkage key from around 180 recognised public hospitals. The outcome of interest was ED length of stay and 30-day all-cause mortality following ED presentation.

Results

A total of 3,029,492 ED presentations were analysed, of which 336,414 (11%) indicated a non-English preferred language. Overall, non-English preferred language groups were associated with longer ED length of stay for both admitted and discharged patients and higher 30-day mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001). There were marked demographic and clinical differences in characteristics across all non-English preferred language groups. After adjusting for these differences across preferred language groups, the Cantonese preferred language group was associated with a small increased risk of 30-day mortality with an adjusted OR: 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05–1.55, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

There were substantial differences with respect to age, presentation characteristics and outcomes across patients from major non-English preferred language groups presenting to ED. Such groups should not be analysed as a single CALD group when examining access and outcomes of ED care, and differences in reported outcomes require further exploration. Any differences in outcomes such as mortality need to be interpreted with caution due to unknown and unmeasured confounders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信