对加拿大老年人无报酬照顾者的护理要领课程的混合方法评估

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Shelley Rottenberg, Allison Williams, Brooke Chmiel
{"title":"对加拿大老年人无报酬照顾者的护理要领课程的混合方法评估","authors":"Shelley Rottenberg,&nbsp;Allison Williams,&nbsp;Brooke Chmiel","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unpaid caregiving is a growing phenomenon, but many family members and friends fall into the role without any prior experience or training. Therefore, many individuals are unequipped with the necessary knowledge and skills needed to manage the demands of caregiving. The <em>Caregiving Essentials</em> course was created to meet the growing need for information and resources among unpaid caregivers of older adults in Ontario (Canada). The evaluation assessed whether the online knowledge intervention was effective in improving the following four areas from the experiences of the caregiver participants: 1) Knowledge, confidence, skills, abilities and self-efficacy; 2) Self-reported sense of personal health and well-being; 3) Perceptions of health and well-being of the care recipient; and 4) Understanding and access to the health and social service system. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, a total of 39 post-course survey responses were collected concurrently with 26 semi-structured interviews with participants who completed half or more (two or more modules). Survey responses were analyzed for descriptive statistics. Thematic coding of interview data was completed using NVivo software and triangulated with the descriptive statistics. Survey findings reveal that the course was not necessarily effective in improving caregivers’ health and well-being because of external factors, but 91 percent of post-survey respondents reported being able to use the course content in their role as a caregiver. Thematic analysis of the interview data indicates participates recognize the course as being effective in improving participants’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, and access to resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods evaluation of the Caregiving Essentials Course for unpaid caregivers of older adults in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Shelley Rottenberg,&nbsp;Allison Williams,&nbsp;Brooke Chmiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Unpaid caregiving is a growing phenomenon, but many family members and friends fall into the role without any prior experience or training. Therefore, many individuals are unequipped with the necessary knowledge and skills needed to manage the demands of caregiving. The <em>Caregiving Essentials</em> course was created to meet the growing need for information and resources among unpaid caregivers of older adults in Ontario (Canada). The evaluation assessed whether the online knowledge intervention was effective in improving the following four areas from the experiences of the caregiver participants: 1) Knowledge, confidence, skills, abilities and self-efficacy; 2) Self-reported sense of personal health and well-being; 3) Perceptions of health and well-being of the care recipient; and 4) Understanding and access to the health and social service system. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, a total of 39 post-course survey responses were collected concurrently with 26 semi-structured interviews with participants who completed half or more (two or more modules). Survey responses were analyzed for descriptive statistics. Thematic coding of interview data was completed using NVivo software and triangulated with the descriptive statistics. Survey findings reveal that the course was not necessarily effective in improving caregivers’ health and well-being because of external factors, but 91 percent of post-survey respondents reported being able to use the course content in their role as a caregiver. Thematic analysis of the interview data indicates participates recognize the course as being effective in improving participants’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, and access to resources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000722\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无薪照顾是一种日益增长的现象,但许多家庭成员和朋友在没有任何经验或培训的情况下就承担了这一角色。因此,许多人不具备管理照顾需求所需的必要知识和技能。开设护理基本课程是为了满足安大略省(加拿大)老年人无薪护理人员对信息和资源日益增长的需求。本评估主要评估在线知识干预在以下四个方面的改善效果:1)知识、信心、技能、能力和自我效能感;2)自我报告的个人健康和幸福感;3)接受护理者对健康和福祉的看法;4)了解和利用卫生和社会服务系统。采用融合并行混合方法,共收集了39个课程后调查回复,同时收集了26个半结构化访谈,参与者完成了一半或更多(两个或更多模块)。对调查结果进行描述性统计分析。使用NVivo软件完成访谈数据的专题编码,并进行描述性统计三角剖分。调查结果显示,由于外部因素,该课程不一定能有效改善照顾者的健康和福祉,但91%的调查后受访者表示,他们能够在照顾者的角色中使用课程内容。对访谈数据的专题分析表明,参与者认为该课程在提高参与者自我认知的知识、信心和获取资源方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-methods evaluation of the Caregiving Essentials Course for unpaid caregivers of older adults in Canada
Unpaid caregiving is a growing phenomenon, but many family members and friends fall into the role without any prior experience or training. Therefore, many individuals are unequipped with the necessary knowledge and skills needed to manage the demands of caregiving. The Caregiving Essentials course was created to meet the growing need for information and resources among unpaid caregivers of older adults in Ontario (Canada). The evaluation assessed whether the online knowledge intervention was effective in improving the following four areas from the experiences of the caregiver participants: 1) Knowledge, confidence, skills, abilities and self-efficacy; 2) Self-reported sense of personal health and well-being; 3) Perceptions of health and well-being of the care recipient; and 4) Understanding and access to the health and social service system. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, a total of 39 post-course survey responses were collected concurrently with 26 semi-structured interviews with participants who completed half or more (two or more modules). Survey responses were analyzed for descriptive statistics. Thematic coding of interview data was completed using NVivo software and triangulated with the descriptive statistics. Survey findings reveal that the course was not necessarily effective in improving caregivers’ health and well-being because of external factors, but 91 percent of post-survey respondents reported being able to use the course content in their role as a caregiver. Thematic analysis of the interview data indicates participates recognize the course as being effective in improving participants’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, and access to resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信