肘关节异位骨化的外科治疗:有无持续被动运动康复的术后结果

Q2 Medicine
Stanley Liu MA , Krishin Shivdasani MD, MPH , Michael Scheidt MD , Andrew L. Chen MD , Nickolas G. Garbis MD , Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA
{"title":"肘关节异位骨化的外科治疗:有无持续被动运动康复的术后结果","authors":"Stanley Liu MA ,&nbsp;Krishin Shivdasani MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Michael Scheidt MD ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Nickolas G. Garbis MD ,&nbsp;Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Continuous passive motion (CPM) has been an accepted method of orthopedic postoperative rehabilitation for decades. However, its efficacy remains disputed and there is a paucity of literature looking at the impact of CPM after operative management of elbow heterotopic ossification (HO). This retrospective study aims to compare long-term clinical outcomes after surgical excision of elbow HO between patients with and without postoperative CPM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent inpatient surgical excision of elbow HO at an academic level I trauma center between September 1999 and August 2022. Forty-eight patients (51 elbows) were identified, consisting of 16 cases that were rehabilitated with CPM and 35 cases that were not. Long-term follow-up examinations included measurement of elbow flexion–extension and pronosupination arcs, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores, and visual analog scale pain scores. Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range 2-24 years). Utilizing CPM vs. no CPM postoperatively was associated with a significantly greater gain in preoperative to final follow-up flexion–extension arc (100° vs. 50°, <em>P</em> = .003) and a significantly smaller loss in intraoperative to final follow-up flexion–extension arc (0° vs. −15°, <em>P</em> = .018). However, it should be noted that there were no significant differences in the final range of motion based on CPM usage (110° vs. 110°, <em>P</em> = .228). Additionally, patients that utilized CPM reported a significantly greater Mayo Elbow Performance score at final follow-up (<em>P</em> = .045).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A CPM rehabilitation regimen after surgical excision of elbow HO may result in improved long-term patient-reported functional outcomes, but further investigation with a prospective, randomized protocol should be pursued.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 924-928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of elbow heterotopic ossification: postoperative outcomes with and without continuous passive motion rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Stanley Liu MA ,&nbsp;Krishin Shivdasani MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Michael Scheidt MD ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Nickolas G. Garbis MD ,&nbsp;Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Continuous passive motion (CPM) has been an accepted method of orthopedic postoperative rehabilitation for decades. However, its efficacy remains disputed and there is a paucity of literature looking at the impact of CPM after operative management of elbow heterotopic ossification (HO). This retrospective study aims to compare long-term clinical outcomes after surgical excision of elbow HO between patients with and without postoperative CPM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent inpatient surgical excision of elbow HO at an academic level I trauma center between September 1999 and August 2022. Forty-eight patients (51 elbows) were identified, consisting of 16 cases that were rehabilitated with CPM and 35 cases that were not. Long-term follow-up examinations included measurement of elbow flexion–extension and pronosupination arcs, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores, and visual analog scale pain scores. Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range 2-24 years). Utilizing CPM vs. no CPM postoperatively was associated with a significantly greater gain in preoperative to final follow-up flexion–extension arc (100° vs. 50°, <em>P</em> = .003) and a significantly smaller loss in intraoperative to final follow-up flexion–extension arc (0° vs. −15°, <em>P</em> = .018). However, it should be noted that there were no significant differences in the final range of motion based on CPM usage (110° vs. 110°, <em>P</em> = .228). Additionally, patients that utilized CPM reported a significantly greater Mayo Elbow Performance score at final follow-up (<em>P</em> = .045).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A CPM rehabilitation regimen after surgical excision of elbow HO may result in improved long-term patient-reported functional outcomes, but further investigation with a prospective, randomized protocol should be pursued.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 924-928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663832500060X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663832500060X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,连续被动运动(CPM)一直是一种公认的骨科术后康复方法。然而,其疗效仍有争议,并且缺乏关于CPM在肘关节异位骨化(HO)手术治疗后影响的文献。本回顾性研究旨在比较有和无术后CPM患者手术切除肘关节HO后的长期临床结果。方法回顾性分析1999年9月至2022年8月在某学术一级创伤中心住院手术切除肘部HO的患者。48例患者(51例肘部)被确定,其中16例接受CPM康复,35例未接受CPM康复。长期随访检查包括测量肘关节屈伸和旋前弧度、Mayo肘关节表现评分和视觉模拟疼痛评分。采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。结果患者最小随访时间为2年,平均随访时间为8年(2 ~ 24年)。术后使用CPM与不使用CPM相比,术前到最终随访屈伸弧度的增加明显更大(100°vs. 50°,P = 0.003),术中到最终随访屈伸弧度的损失明显更小(0°vs. - 15°,P = 0.018)。然而,应该注意的是,基于CPM使用的最终运动范围没有显著差异(110°vs 110°,P = .228)。此外,使用CPM的患者在最终随访时报告了显著更高的Mayo肘部性能评分(P = 0.045)。结论肘关节骨组织手术切除后的CPM康复方案可能会改善患者报告的长期功能结果,但需要进一步进行前瞻性随机方案的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of elbow heterotopic ossification: postoperative outcomes with and without continuous passive motion rehabilitation

Background

Continuous passive motion (CPM) has been an accepted method of orthopedic postoperative rehabilitation for decades. However, its efficacy remains disputed and there is a paucity of literature looking at the impact of CPM after operative management of elbow heterotopic ossification (HO). This retrospective study aims to compare long-term clinical outcomes after surgical excision of elbow HO between patients with and without postoperative CPM.

Methods

A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent inpatient surgical excision of elbow HO at an academic level I trauma center between September 1999 and August 2022. Forty-eight patients (51 elbows) were identified, consisting of 16 cases that were rehabilitated with CPM and 35 cases that were not. Long-term follow-up examinations included measurement of elbow flexion–extension and pronosupination arcs, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores, and visual analog scale pain scores. Mann–Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range 2-24 years). Utilizing CPM vs. no CPM postoperatively was associated with a significantly greater gain in preoperative to final follow-up flexion–extension arc (100° vs. 50°, P = .003) and a significantly smaller loss in intraoperative to final follow-up flexion–extension arc (0° vs. −15°, P = .018). However, it should be noted that there were no significant differences in the final range of motion based on CPM usage (110° vs. 110°, P = .228). Additionally, patients that utilized CPM reported a significantly greater Mayo Elbow Performance score at final follow-up (P = .045).

Conclusion

A CPM rehabilitation regimen after surgical excision of elbow HO may result in improved long-term patient-reported functional outcomes, but further investigation with a prospective, randomized protocol should be pursued.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信