{"title":"拉丁裔儿童ADHD行为测量与预测的不变性探讨","authors":"Christopher DeCamp, Christopher J. Lonigan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The goal of this study was to determine whether the measurement of children’s externalizing behaviors, as rated by teachers on a short version of the Conners’ Rating Scale, was invariant for Latino and non-Latino children with different language backgrounds and whether those ratings displayed invariant prediction of academic outcomes. The sample included 1,174 children (592 boys, 582 girls) who ranged in age from 38 – 73 months (<em>M</em> = 54.42 months; <em>SD</em> = 4.64 months) at the time of initial assessment. Model fit indices highlighted that teacher ratings displayed fully invariant measurement. Prediction was found to be invariant for all language and literacy outcomes but not for math outcomes. This was due to differences in ratings of oppositional defiant behavior for non-Latino children. Because differences in ratings of oppositional defiant behaviors for non-Latino children led to a lack of predictive invariance on math outcomes, and oppositional defiant behaviors have smaller associations with important outcomes, like a child’s academic achievement, these differences are unlikely to have meaningful clinical implications. Overall, these results suggest that the Conners Teacher Rating Scale-15 Item Version measures externalizing behaviors the same way for children of varying ethnic and language backgrounds. This may have important implications for research and multi-informant assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 352-360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring invariance of the measurement and prediction of ADHD behaviors in Latino children\",\"authors\":\"Christopher DeCamp, Christopher J. Lonigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The goal of this study was to determine whether the measurement of children’s externalizing behaviors, as rated by teachers on a short version of the Conners’ Rating Scale, was invariant for Latino and non-Latino children with different language backgrounds and whether those ratings displayed invariant prediction of academic outcomes. The sample included 1,174 children (592 boys, 582 girls) who ranged in age from 38 – 73 months (<em>M</em> = 54.42 months; <em>SD</em> = 4.64 months) at the time of initial assessment. Model fit indices highlighted that teacher ratings displayed fully invariant measurement. Prediction was found to be invariant for all language and literacy outcomes but not for math outcomes. This was due to differences in ratings of oppositional defiant behavior for non-Latino children. Because differences in ratings of oppositional defiant behaviors for non-Latino children led to a lack of predictive invariance on math outcomes, and oppositional defiant behaviors have smaller associations with important outcomes, like a child’s academic achievement, these differences are unlikely to have meaningful clinical implications. Overall, these results suggest that the Conners Teacher Rating Scale-15 Item Version measures externalizing behaviors the same way for children of varying ethnic and language backgrounds. This may have important implications for research and multi-informant assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 352-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000389\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring invariance of the measurement and prediction of ADHD behaviors in Latino children
The goal of this study was to determine whether the measurement of children’s externalizing behaviors, as rated by teachers on a short version of the Conners’ Rating Scale, was invariant for Latino and non-Latino children with different language backgrounds and whether those ratings displayed invariant prediction of academic outcomes. The sample included 1,174 children (592 boys, 582 girls) who ranged in age from 38 – 73 months (M = 54.42 months; SD = 4.64 months) at the time of initial assessment. Model fit indices highlighted that teacher ratings displayed fully invariant measurement. Prediction was found to be invariant for all language and literacy outcomes but not for math outcomes. This was due to differences in ratings of oppositional defiant behavior for non-Latino children. Because differences in ratings of oppositional defiant behaviors for non-Latino children led to a lack of predictive invariance on math outcomes, and oppositional defiant behaviors have smaller associations with important outcomes, like a child’s academic achievement, these differences are unlikely to have meaningful clinical implications. Overall, these results suggest that the Conners Teacher Rating Scale-15 Item Version measures externalizing behaviors the same way for children of varying ethnic and language backgrounds. This may have important implications for research and multi-informant assessment.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.