Yan Hu, Daniel Jones, Weiqiang Zhao, Gary Tozbikian, Anil V. Parwani, Zaibo Li
{"title":"人表皮生长因子受体2 -超低值乳腺癌的发病率、临床病理特征及随访结果","authors":"Yan Hu, Daniel Jones, Weiqiang Zhao, Gary Tozbikian, Anil V. Parwani, Zaibo Li","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The preliminary result of DESTINY-Breast06 trial demonstrated the effectiveness of antibody-drug conjugate in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)–ultralow breast carcinoma (BC), defined by the presence of ≤10% of infiltrating cancer cells showing incomplete and faint/weak membrane staining on HER2 immunohistochemistry. In this study, we investigated the pathologic features and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-ultralow, HER2-null, and HER2-low expression. The incidence of HER2 ultralow was 17.5% (260/1486). The incidence of other groups is as follows: 7.7% for HER2 null, 56.8% for HER2 low, and 18% for HER2 positive. HER2-ultralow cases showed similarity to HER2-low cases but a significant difference from HER2-null cases, including older age (61.1 vs 57.3 years; <em>P</em> = .0099), fewer grade 3 BCs (18.1% vs 53.9%; <em>P</em> < .0001), triple-negative BCs (16.2% vs 42.6%; <em>P</em> < .0001), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative BCs (16.5% vs 47.8%; <em>P</em> < .0001), and progesterone receptor–negative BCs (26.2% vs 54.8%; <em>P</em> < .0001). When cases were stratified based on ER positivity, these differences between HER2-null and HER2-ultralow groups were confined to ER+ but not ER− cases. There were no discernible differences in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 125) among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low BCs. HER2-null/ER−BCs displayed a lower probability of overall survival than HER2-ultralow and HER2-low/ER−BCs, but no statistically significant difference was observed in disease-free survival among the 3 groups. HER2-ultralow BCs exhibit distinct features that align more closely with HER2-low BCs than HER2-null BCs. These findings contribute to the evolving classification of HER2 expression in BC and may have implications for refining treatment strategies in this subgroup.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":"38 8","pages":"Article 100783"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, and Follow-Up Results of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–Ultralow Breast Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Yan Hu, Daniel Jones, Weiqiang Zhao, Gary Tozbikian, Anil V. Parwani, Zaibo Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The preliminary result of DESTINY-Breast06 trial demonstrated the effectiveness of antibody-drug conjugate in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)–ultralow breast carcinoma (BC), defined by the presence of ≤10% of infiltrating cancer cells showing incomplete and faint/weak membrane staining on HER2 immunohistochemistry. In this study, we investigated the pathologic features and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-ultralow, HER2-null, and HER2-low expression. The incidence of HER2 ultralow was 17.5% (260/1486). The incidence of other groups is as follows: 7.7% for HER2 null, 56.8% for HER2 low, and 18% for HER2 positive. HER2-ultralow cases showed similarity to HER2-low cases but a significant difference from HER2-null cases, including older age (61.1 vs 57.3 years; <em>P</em> = .0099), fewer grade 3 BCs (18.1% vs 53.9%; <em>P</em> < .0001), triple-negative BCs (16.2% vs 42.6%; <em>P</em> < .0001), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative BCs (16.5% vs 47.8%; <em>P</em> < .0001), and progesterone receptor–negative BCs (26.2% vs 54.8%; <em>P</em> < .0001). When cases were stratified based on ER positivity, these differences between HER2-null and HER2-ultralow groups were confined to ER+ but not ER− cases. There were no discernible differences in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 125) among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low BCs. HER2-null/ER−BCs displayed a lower probability of overall survival than HER2-ultralow and HER2-low/ER−BCs, but no statistically significant difference was observed in disease-free survival among the 3 groups. HER2-ultralow BCs exhibit distinct features that align more closely with HER2-low BCs than HER2-null BCs. These findings contribute to the evolving classification of HER2 expression in BC and may have implications for refining treatment strategies in this subgroup.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Pathology\",\"volume\":\"38 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 100783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395225000791\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395225000791","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, and Follow-Up Results of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–Ultralow Breast Carcinoma
The preliminary result of DESTINY-Breast06 trial demonstrated the effectiveness of antibody-drug conjugate in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)–ultralow breast carcinoma (BC), defined by the presence of ≤10% of infiltrating cancer cells showing incomplete and faint/weak membrane staining on HER2 immunohistochemistry. In this study, we investigated the pathologic features and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-ultralow, HER2-null, and HER2-low expression. The incidence of HER2 ultralow was 17.5% (260/1486). The incidence of other groups is as follows: 7.7% for HER2 null, 56.8% for HER2 low, and 18% for HER2 positive. HER2-ultralow cases showed similarity to HER2-low cases but a significant difference from HER2-null cases, including older age (61.1 vs 57.3 years; P = .0099), fewer grade 3 BCs (18.1% vs 53.9%; P < .0001), triple-negative BCs (16.2% vs 42.6%; P < .0001), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative BCs (16.5% vs 47.8%; P < .0001), and progesterone receptor–negative BCs (26.2% vs 54.8%; P < .0001). When cases were stratified based on ER positivity, these differences between HER2-null and HER2-ultralow groups were confined to ER+ but not ER− cases. There were no discernible differences in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 125) among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low BCs. HER2-null/ER−BCs displayed a lower probability of overall survival than HER2-ultralow and HER2-low/ER−BCs, but no statistically significant difference was observed in disease-free survival among the 3 groups. HER2-ultralow BCs exhibit distinct features that align more closely with HER2-low BCs than HER2-null BCs. These findings contribute to the evolving classification of HER2 expression in BC and may have implications for refining treatment strategies in this subgroup.
期刊介绍:
Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology.
Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.