Dennis A. Eichenauer, Aylin Basaran, Ina Bühnen, Michael Fuchs, Bastian von Tresckow, Andreas Rosenwald, Martin-Leo Hansmann, Heinz-Wolfram Bernd, Peter Borchmann, Wolfram Klapper, Sylvia Hartmann
{"title":"在结节淋巴细胞为主的霍奇金淋巴瘤中,细化基于组织病理学生长模式的风险群体区分:来自德国霍奇金研究组的分析","authors":"Dennis A. Eichenauer, Aylin Basaran, Ina Bühnen, Michael Fuchs, Bastian von Tresckow, Andreas Rosenwald, Martin-Leo Hansmann, Heinz-Wolfram Bernd, Peter Borchmann, Wolfram Klapper, Sylvia Hartmann","doi":"10.1038/s41375-025-02641-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Histopathological growth patterns (GP) in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) have previously been divided into GP AB (typical) vs CDEF (variant). However, it is unclear whether this division is optimal. We thus investigated alternative GP grouping approaches (GP ABC vs DEF; GP ABCF vs DE). Overall, 583 NLPHL patients who had first-line treatment within GHSG trials were included in the analysis. Median age was 39 years; 74% of patients were male; 76% presented with early-stage and 24% with advanced-stage disease. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for all patients were 85.9% and 76.6%; overall survival (OS) estimates were 95.8% and 94.5%. Significant PFS and OS differences were detected for the comparison GP ABCF vs DE with worse outcomes for the GP DE group (HR: 1.7; 95%-CI: 1.1–2.7; HR: 2.5; 95%-CI: 1.1–5.7). No PFS and OS differences were observed for the comparisons GP AB vs CDEF and GP ABC vs DEF. Median time to death was shorter and death more often due to NLPHL in the GP DE (13 months; 66.7%) than in the GP ABCF (31 months; 5.6%) group. Hence, the division of GP into GP ABCF vs DE allows an optimized GP-based risk group discrimination in NLPHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining histopathological growth pattern-based risk group discrimination in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis from the German Hodgkin Study Group\",\"authors\":\"Dennis A. Eichenauer, Aylin Basaran, Ina Bühnen, Michael Fuchs, Bastian von Tresckow, Andreas Rosenwald, Martin-Leo Hansmann, Heinz-Wolfram Bernd, Peter Borchmann, Wolfram Klapper, Sylvia Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41375-025-02641-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Histopathological growth patterns (GP) in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) have previously been divided into GP AB (typical) vs CDEF (variant). However, it is unclear whether this division is optimal. We thus investigated alternative GP grouping approaches (GP ABC vs DEF; GP ABCF vs DE). Overall, 583 NLPHL patients who had first-line treatment within GHSG trials were included in the analysis. Median age was 39 years; 74% of patients were male; 76% presented with early-stage and 24% with advanced-stage disease. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for all patients were 85.9% and 76.6%; overall survival (OS) estimates were 95.8% and 94.5%. Significant PFS and OS differences were detected for the comparison GP ABCF vs DE with worse outcomes for the GP DE group (HR: 1.7; 95%-CI: 1.1–2.7; HR: 2.5; 95%-CI: 1.1–5.7). No PFS and OS differences were observed for the comparisons GP AB vs CDEF and GP ABC vs DEF. Median time to death was shorter and death more often due to NLPHL in the GP DE (13 months; 66.7%) than in the GP ABCF (31 months; 5.6%) group. Hence, the division of GP into GP ABCF vs DE allows an optimized GP-based risk group discrimination in NLPHL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02641-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02641-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
结节性淋巴细胞主导型霍奇金淋巴瘤(NLPHL)的组织病理学生长模式(GP)以前被分为GP AB(典型)和CDEF(变异)。然而,目前尚不清楚这种划分是否是最佳的。因此,我们研究了其他GP分组方法(GP ABC vs DEF;GP ABCF vs DE)。总体而言,583名在GHSG试验中接受一线治疗的NLPHL患者被纳入分析。中位年龄39岁;74%的患者为男性;76%为早期疾病,24%为晚期疾病。所有患者的5年和10年无进展生存率(PFS)估计值分别为85.9%和76.6%;总生存率(OS)估计分别为95.8%和94.5%。GP ABCF组与DE组比较,PFS和OS存在显著差异,GP DE组预后更差(HR: 1.7;95% ci: 1.1—-2.7;人力资源:2.5;95% ci: 1.1—-5.7)。GP AB组与CDEF组、GP ABC组与DEF组比较,无PFS和OS差异。GP DE组中位死亡时间更短,且NLPHL导致的死亡更常见(13个月;66.7%)比GP ABCF组(31个月;5.6%)。因此,将GP分为GP ABCF和DE,可以优化基于GP的NLPHL风险群体区分。
Refining histopathological growth pattern-based risk group discrimination in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis from the German Hodgkin Study Group
Histopathological growth patterns (GP) in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) have previously been divided into GP AB (typical) vs CDEF (variant). However, it is unclear whether this division is optimal. We thus investigated alternative GP grouping approaches (GP ABC vs DEF; GP ABCF vs DE). Overall, 583 NLPHL patients who had first-line treatment within GHSG trials were included in the analysis. Median age was 39 years; 74% of patients were male; 76% presented with early-stage and 24% with advanced-stage disease. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for all patients were 85.9% and 76.6%; overall survival (OS) estimates were 95.8% and 94.5%. Significant PFS and OS differences were detected for the comparison GP ABCF vs DE with worse outcomes for the GP DE group (HR: 1.7; 95%-CI: 1.1–2.7; HR: 2.5; 95%-CI: 1.1–5.7). No PFS and OS differences were observed for the comparisons GP AB vs CDEF and GP ABC vs DEF. Median time to death was shorter and death more often due to NLPHL in the GP DE (13 months; 66.7%) than in the GP ABCF (31 months; 5.6%) group. Hence, the division of GP into GP ABCF vs DE allows an optimized GP-based risk group discrimination in NLPHL.
期刊介绍:
Title: Leukemia
Journal Overview:
Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research
Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases
Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance
Topics of Interest:
Oncogenes
Growth factors
Stem cells
Leukemia genomics
Cell cycle
Signal transduction
Molecular targets for therapy
And more
Content Types:
Original research articles
Reviews
Letters
Correspondence
Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues